After receiving a lot of backlash comments from netizens on the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) reasoning behind deciding to reopen the schools amid the COVID-19 virus outbreak, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung deleted his previous Facebook post and replaced the post with new ones, and netizens are curious to ask why it was deleted.

Earlier on Sunday (22 March), Mr Ong in his recently-deleted Facebook post underlined the three different reasons – scientific evidence, taking extra precautions, and a goal to reduce disruptions – as to why students are allowed to start classes following the March holidays, along with the link to the Straits Times’s article on Children less likely to be sick from Covid-19: Professor”.

The deleted post, however, has gained a lot of ‘unsupported comments’ from the netizens and was replaced shortly with a new post.

In Mr Ong’s new post, he posted the same content but without the link. He stated that the previous post had to be deleted as it cannot be shared properly due to the link that was tagged in it.

“I realised that my last post cannot be shared properly because of a link. I have removed the link and reposted. Wasted 900 shares but more important to get the message out. Learn something everyday,” he asserted.

The new post, on the other hand, seems to bring in more supportive comments compared to the deleted post.

Following that, some netizens questioned why the previous post that was claimed filled with ‘unsupported comments’ was deleted.

Facebook user Yen Lim pointed out that more than 70% of the comments were not supportive of the MOE’s decision in Mr Ong’s earlier post, but now the new post seems to have more supportive comments. She further noted, “Something is fishy!”

Other commenters noted that Mr Ong could have edited the previous post rather than deleting the post that was already filled with comments from people who only voiced out their opinions.

Some netizens commented that the previous post was deleted because of too many disagreements, thus it was replaced with a ‘better one’.

Meanwhile, several netizens noticed the post had been replaced and decided to rewrite their comments in the new post.

 

One netizen also indicated Mr Ong’s move to delete the previous post was ‘fishy’.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Redditors criticise SIA’s economy class meal “downgraded” quality, comparing it to army camp food

Concerns have been raised about a decline in the quality of Singapore Airlines’ economy-class in-flight meals, as comments on a Reddit thread suggest. The thread discussed a Facebook post where a member of a group who travelled with Singapore Airlines shared photos of the in-flight meals during a family trip to Taipei. One Reddit post pointed out a discussion on a local forum that claimed cakes, desserts, and fresh fruits have been replaced with a single cracker biscuit served on a cheap disposable plastic tray. Some Redditors expressed their disappointment with SIA, with some citing examples of soggy and salty noodles and a decline in overall food quality and presentation since the pandemic while some Redditors also criticized SIA for charging a 30% premium while delivering only average quality, which could damage their long-established reputation.

TraceTogether tokens not compulsory at schools just yet, says Minister Sun Xueling; netizens ask if it is due to tokens being out of stock

Minister of State for Education Sun Xueling has clarified on Tuesday (15…

Netizens lambast passengers of Royal Caribbean cruise ship for travelling during pandemic after guest tested positive for COVID-19

An 83-year-old passenger of a Royal Caribbean cruise ship Quantum of the…

"Some improvement" in race relations among Singaporeans except in workplaces, says Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam … but do minorities concur?

While there has been a “slight increase” in the “perception” of racial…