Lady relieving herself

 

Lady relieving herself
Lady relieving herself
 
According to the Environmental Public Health Act, Environmental Public Health (Public Cleansing) Regulations:

“No person shall urinate or defecate in or upon any street, arcade, vacant land, river, canal, ditch, drain or watercourse or in any place to which the public has access except in any sanitary convenience provided for such purpose.”

The law on public health has been strictly enforced in Singapore through the years, and it is important for the authorities to do so, given how small the island is and how compact it has become.
Such enforcements have resulted in Singapore having a reputation as one of the cleanest cities in the world. Indeed, those old enough will remember Singapore being touted – and recognised – as a garden city, with clean streets and top public hygiene standards.
However, in recent times numerous incidents of people urinating and defecating in public – including at void decks, inside trains, in elevators – are causing alarm, and raising questions of whether laws protecting public health need to be relooked or enforced even more strictly.
On Thursday, 13 August, website The Real Singapore reported a lady apparently relieving herself in public beside a MRT station in Buona Vista. It is unclear if she was urinating or defecating. (Picture above.)
After she was done, she could be seen wiping herself.
Hollan V pee 2jpg
Her behaviour has caused an uproar online, with many slamming her for her anti-social act.
But hers is just one of many incidents in recent times. (Please see pictures below.)
When Singapore was starting out as an independent, sovereign nation, the government embarked on numerous public awareness campaigns to stomp out such public nuisance, including littering and spitting.
The government even made it a punishable offence to “expel mucous from the nose upon or onto any street or upon or onto the floor or other part of a public service vehicle, a place of public resort or any place to which the public has access.”
That law still stands, by the way.
The government had also gone the length to install sensors in elevators of HDB blocks to deter urinating, even though some still find it hard to resist relieving themselves there.
Several weeks ago, for example, the Tanjong Pagar Town Council put out the following poster of a woman urinating in an elevator, to urge the public not to do what the lady in the poster had done.
Tanjong Pagar lift pee
Perhaps the authorities, besides taking a stronger stance against such behaviour, should also start conducting public campaigns again to raise awareness of the threats which such anti-social behaviour presents to public health.
The penalties for contravening the Environmental Public Health Act are as follows:
Any person who contravenes any provision of these Regulations shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —

(a) for a first offence, to a fine not exceeding $1,000 and to a further fine not exceeding $100 for every day or part thereof during which the offence continues after conviction;
(b) for a second offence, to a fine not exceeding $2,000 and to a further fine not exceeding $200 for every day or part thereof during which the offence continues after conviction; and
(c) for a third or subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding $5,000 and to a further fine not exceeding $500 for every day or part thereof during which the offence continues after conviction.

What do you feel about this? Please click here to vote your stance on this: “Photo Of PRC Woman Peeing Onto MRT Station’s Floors Very Disturbing”.
——————-
Here are some incidents in recent times:

Boy urinating in RWS foodcourt
Boy urinating in RWS foodcourt
Urinating in MRT
Urinating in MRT
Urinating in lift
Urinating in lift
Defecating at Ion
Defecating at Ion
Defecating in Admiralty Link
Defecating in Admiralty Link
Urinating onto floor at Chinatown
Urinating onto floor at Chinatown
Defecating in drain in Chinatown
Defecating in drain in Chinatown
Urinating in Changi food centre
Urinating in Changi food centre
Urinating into bin
Urinating into bin
 
relief
 
MP Baey Yam Keng's FB post
MP Baey Yam Keng’s FB post
MP Tin Pei Ling
MP Tin Pei Ling
Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The revelation about press manipulation back in 1997 bears striking similarities to 2017 AGC investigation on a private post by Li Shengwu

Just recently on 25 April, former Associate Editor of Straits Times Bertha…

【选举】准候选人介绍完毕 行动党明天宣布竞选宣言

人民行动党今天(6月26日)透过线上记者会,进行了两场准候选人介绍会,并将于明天宣布竞选宣言。 今早的首场记者会上,行动党副主席马善高介绍了四名准候选人。 他们分别是职总就业与职能培训中心(e2i)副总裁颜晓芳(46岁)、律师事务所董事杨陞才(41岁)、新加坡飞机机械服务有限公司(SAESL)项目管理办公室与策略部副总裁沙礼尔(39岁)、心禾(ROHEI)企业培训学院总裁兼创办人以及非盈利组织Trybe主席王心妍(47岁)。其中,颜晓芳也是我国第一位女准将,在空军拥有25年的经验,于今年3月卸下空军参谋长的职务。 在第二场也是最后一场准候选人介绍会上,由行动党第二助理秘书长陈振声主持,介绍了另外四名准候选人。 他们分别为Jingslink Marketing Pte Ltd市场总监的陈惠意(44岁)、慈善组织Daughters of Tomorrow Limited执行董事的陈澮敏(38岁)、淡马锡控股企业发展集团董事黄伟中(38岁)、以及波士顿咨询集团董事总经理兼合伙人佳馥梅(Mariam Jaafar,43岁)。其中陈惠意曾于上届大选中,以新人之姿被介绍给媒体,但是最终无缘参选阿裕尼集选区,目前已经在实龙岗担任支部主席六年了。…

牙科协会:10人中有九人担忧牙科护理费用提高

牙科协会(Singapore Dental Association,简称SDA)近日释出一项调查报告,10个人当中有九个民众表示他们对牙科护理的费用提高感到担忧。 其中有三分之一的受测者表示针对日益渐长的牙科护理费用,他们会试图寻找价格相对实惠的“其他方式”,包括前往柔佛或曼谷获得较便宜的治疗。 该项调查邀请了共1438名,年龄介于25至60岁参与者,调查结果于9月11日公布。 据调查显示,大约七成左右的受测者倾向前往私人牙科诊所接受治疗,而另外近三成的人虽然选择前往公共牙科诊所接受治疗,但却要“等久久”。 将近五分之一的受测者表示,已达三年以上不去看牙科,还有76巴仙的人则表示担心因生活开销的增长导致牙科费用日益昂贵。 牙科协会主席Tang Kok Weng向媒体透露,“针对日益渐长的牙科费用,我们亦相当关注。”牙科协会表示,希望在未来不要有“额外的费用”纳入目前的高额的牙科费用当中。 本社英文站也随即查看柔佛州的牙科费用是否比起新加坡更实惠,结果如下: 显然,一套臼齿根管治疗在柔佛州仅需500新元,但在新加坡却要两倍以上,公共诊所最便宜除了樟宜医院以外,其他几乎要价要700至800新元,甚至部分私人诊所开价到750至1605新元。…