Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam. Source: CNA

While there has been a “slight increase” in the “perception” of racial discrimination at the workplace against minorities in Singapore, there has also been “some improvement” in race relations among Singaporeans overall, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam.
“Is there racism in Singapore? Of course there is. There is racism in every multi-racial society that we know of. And there is, in Singapore,” said Mr Shanmugam in a Facebook post on Sun (4 Aug).
He said that the government has never shied away from the fact that racism exists in Singapore, and have in fact opened multiple avenues such as the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) surveys to “discuss it openly”.
“They come out once every two years – details our people’s views on race, religious issues. The latest IPS survey issued last week showed in fact a slight increase in perception of workplace racial discrimination. In some other areas of race relationships, there was some improvement,” said Mr Shanmugam.
The “IPS-OnePeople.sg Indicators of Racial and Religious Harmony: Comparing Results from 2018 and 2013” survey, conducted by the IPS at the NUS Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, found that compared to other areas such as public infrastructure including transport and hospitals, racial minorities in Singapore were found “more likely” to perceive discrimination in the workplace.
While overall perceived workplace discrimination was “still relatively low”, with under seven per cent of respondents stating that they have regularly perceived such discrimination, the proportions were “expectedly were higher for racial minorities”.
The researchers found that approximately nine per cent of minorities “often, very often or always perceived discrimination at work compared to 2 per cent of Chinese respondents (see Table 28)”, with around one-third of Malay and Indian respondents perceiving discrimination at work “sometimes, often, or very often or always”.
“Conversely, one in 10 Chinese respondents expressed similar sentiments,” according to the researchers’ findings.

The perception of discrimination when applying for jobs, according to the IPS survey findings, was also higher among Malays and Indians (see Table 29).
The proportions who perceived such discriminatory behaviour often, very often or always was also “marginally higher in 2018 compared to 2013”. For instance, 22.3 per cent of Malays in 2018 felt discriminated “often, very often or always” when applying for a job, an increase from the 19.4 per cent who felt similarly in 2013, the report found.

Similar patterns were observed in the area of job promotions, in which it was reported that “at least 18 per cent of Malays and 20 percent of Indians” had “sometimes, often, very often or always” experienced discrimination when seeking job promotions, in contrast with around only three per cent of of Chinese Singaporeans who reported such sentiments.
The perception of racial discrimination in seeking job promotions have also increased over the years from 2013 to last year, according to the report, with 32.4 per cent of Malays reporting “sometimes” having such a perception last year compared to the 26.7 per cent who felt similarly in 2013, while 18.4 per cent reported “often, very often or always” in 2018 compared to 17.1 per cent in 2013.

 
 
Highlighting that MHA and other ministries have taken proactive steps to combat racism in Singapore society through various initiatives such as “regular conferences, symposiums, and dialogues”, Mr Shanmugam said that the Government can only do so much, and that “there are aspects where people have to become more aware, and more sensitive”.
“We have made much progress from that day on 9 August 1965, when Mr Lee Kuan Yew very powerfully said, “We are not a Malay nation, we are not a Chinese nation, we are not an Indian nation. This is a country for all Singaporeans,”” he added.
Nair siblings “had every right to raise the issue of racism”, but they did not do it correctly: Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam
Touching on rising YouTube duo Preeti Nair and Subhas Nair’s video response to the NETS E-Pay advertisement, Mr Shanmugam said that while “[t]he Nair siblings, like everyone else, had every right to raise the issue of racism”, he disagreed with the way they had expressed their indignation.
“I agree with their right to raise it, but question the way it was done. If everyone starts discussing race and religion in the way they did, then you will in fact get more racism, not less. That is our key concern. They have used the language of resistance in America, but we thankfully are in a very different situation,” he said.
Mr Shanmugam, however, also criticised the E-Pay advertisement, saying that it was done “in poor taste”, and that given the overwhelming backlash against the advertisement and the people involved in its production, he said that others “need to learn from that” and to “be much more sensitive” of the implications behind even such “casual” racism.
Highlighting political and social unrest happening elsewhere such as the Hong Kong protests, the Texas mass shooting, the Kashmir militant attack alert, and the arrest of 600 protestors in Russia, Mr Shanmugam said that while such countries “face different issues”, there is “much that we can be positive about as Singaporeans”, and that Singaporeans “can be thankful that we have avoided headlines like these”.
“As we approach our National Day, there is much that we can be positive about as Singaporeans, and look forward to further progress … We must continue to focus on getting things better, discuss issues openly and work on them,” he said.
Some minority race netizens sceptical of Mr Shanmugam’s claim that race relations have improved in areas other than the workplace
Several netizens, including those from minority race communities, agreed with Mr Shanmugam’s statements and the government’s efforts to improve race relations among Singaporeans, while claiming that other individuals of minority races who take a similar approach to the Nair siblings in their video are being “overly sensitive” and are merely fanning racial tensions among Singaporeans:




However, many minority race netizens have also questioned Mr Shanmugam’s criticism of the Nair siblings’ response to the E-Pay advertisement, suggesting that the policing of the latter’s language misses the point of the rap video, which was intended to spark an honest discussion about racism beyond the sanitised avenues of “dialogues and symposiums” as suggested by the Minister:





One commenter, in particular, suggested that racial discrimination at the workplace can be mitigated by banning job advertisements that require applicants to “be able to write and converse in Mandarin/Chinese”, as such a requirement will inevitably exclude many applicants from minority races who may have limited proficiency to none in Chinese:



Another commenter pointed out that certain government policies and measures appear to run contrary to what Mr Shanmugam has said about not engaging in inflammatory debates on racism:

MHA slams the Nair siblings’ “insincere” first apology, says Police are still investigating and seeking advice from AGC
In the rap video response to the E-Pay advertisement, which was released last Mon (29 Jul), the siblings were seen repeatedly uttering “Chinese people always out here f***king it up”, while condemning Chinese Singaporeans who engage in the exploitation of minorities such as Indians and Malays for their own profit via such racism.
Subhas, who was notably dressed similarly to the “K Muthusamy” character portrayed by Chew in the advertisement, pointed out in the video what many Singaporeans have highlighted in their response to the parody: “You should have cast a makcik [informal term for a slightly older Malay lady], you should have called her.”
“How can a man wear brown and wear a tudung? Two wrongs don’t make a right,” read one of the lines in Preeti’s verse, in a subtle jab against the perceived act of “brownface” done by Chew in dressing up as a Malay woman in a hijab.
The controversial advertisement, which has since been modified to remove the offending material, portrayed Mediacorp actor and DJ Dennis Chew as multiple “characters” of different races in Singapore, such as a Malay woman in a headscarf and an Indian man with darkened skin, a Chinese woman in a pink jacket and a Chinese man with a moustache in the advertisement.
The advertisement drew flak from many Singaporeans, with parallels being drawn to “brownface” — the racist act of darkening fair skin for entertainment purposes at the expense of people of “brown” races such as Indians and Malays, regardless whether or not it is intentional. Many critics have also pointed out why actual Malay and Indian actors or models were not hired to portray individuals of their respective races instead.
Preeti also poked fun at the C.M.I.O acronym — Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others — that typically characterises the fabric of Singapore’s multiracial society, saying: “Cancel Minority Is Ok!”.
In a scene depicting a conversation between Preeti and Subhas, the latter pointed out that an advertisement for last Deepavali entailed the same “brownface” act, in which a Chinese man was dressed to portray a Sikh man.
The video garnered 4,000 views and almost 150 shares on Facebook just two hours after it was posted. However, the video was taken down from Facebook and other social media channels by last Tue (29 Jul) afternoon after it was condemned by the government.
A police report was lodged against Preeti over the video, following which police said in a statement the same day that the video was being investigated for “offensive content that causes ill-will between races”. Police has also reminded the public not to circulate the video.
Subhas was also removed from “ROAR”, a CNA National Day musical documentary, for his involvement in the video, CNA announced last Wed.
MHA, in response to the siblings’ purportedly “mock, insincere” apology last Fri (2 Aug), said that Police are currently “continuing their investigations and taking advice” from the Attorney-General’s Chambers regarding the duo’s case.
Their apology, said MHA the same day, “is a spoof of an earlier apology issued by Havas Worldwide for the E-Pay advertisement (Nets subsequently issued an apology)”.
“This spoofing is a pretence of an apology, and in fact shows contempt for the many Singaporeans who have expressed concern at their blatantly racist rap video,” added MHA.
The Nair siblings issued a joint statement the next day, stating that they “unconditionally apologise for the tone, aggression, vulgarities, and gestures used in the K. Muthusamy music video”.
“People are offended and we sincerely apologise for it,” they said, adding: “If we could do it over again, we would change the manner in which we approached this issue, and would have worded our thoughts better.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

84-year-old Singaporean becomes 12th COVID-19 fatality; cases surge past 10,000 mark

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has reported the country’s 12th COVID-19 death…

PAP should not view dissenting views with fear

~by: Ghui~ Many have remarked over the last few months that Singaporean…

新加坡等国不愿被迫选边站 李显龙:亚洲前景取决中美能否克服分歧

我国总理李显龙,在最新一期的《外交》杂志,发表题为《濒危的亚洲世纪– 中国、美国以及对峙的危险》评论。 有关文章探讨中美关系对亚洲的影响,也提及许多亚洲经济体都与中美两国有关联。李显龙认为,许多国家包括新加坡,都不愿被逼迫两者之间选边站。 他指出,中美做出的战略选择,会形塑全球秩序的轮廓。“大国之间相互竞争是自然的。不过他们之间的协作能力才是治国之道的真正考验。这将决定人类在诸如气候暖化、核扩散、疾病传播等全球性议题上,能否取得进展。” 李显龙不忘提起,当前的冠状病毒19疫情,就足以提醒各国相互协作的重要。 “疾病不认国界,当前迫切需要国际间的合作来控制疫情,减低对全球经济的伤害。”但他坦言,即便假设中美两国关系最好状态,要协调对疫情的集体行动仍是很大的挑战。 他指出,亚洲国家目前已全神贯注解决眼下的疫情危机和挑战,以协助改善国人生活,打造更安全和繁荣的区域。 “它们的成功以及亚洲世纪的前景,取决于中美能否克服分歧,建立互信和有建设性地努力,以维护稳定与和平的国际秩序。这是我们这个时代的根本问题。”

周崇庆为电子支付广告争议公开致歉

近日,电子支付平台Epay因为争议性广告引起坊间注意和挞伐,该广告请艺人周崇庆饰演4种不同角色,包括印度人和穆斯林妇女,被批欠缺族群敏感度,对此星网电子支付公司NETS 也为该广告公开致歉。 在昨日(7日),周崇庆本人也在个人社交媒体Instagram上,为自己所扮演的角色公开致歉。 他于帖文中表示,“我在广告当中所扮演的角色已令许多民众感到失望。这些天未能发表我的想法,是担心事情会愈演愈烈。如今演变成这样我亦感到难受。” 周崇庆续指,尽管事情已无法回头,但他仍然想向大家表示万分抱歉。 帖文最后,他表示,“我们生活在一个和谐地多元种族社会当中,所以我们不应将所有事情视为理所应当。未来会设下更高的标准监督自己,为自己的家人、朋友、同事,以及最重要的大家,成为更好的人。” 日前,周崇庆在电子支付广告中一人饰演四角,包括印度人和穆斯林妇女,随后引发众人议论,被批欠缺敏感度,也接收到各界的批评,其中就有杂志编辑在推特炮轰:“2019年,新加坡广告还有“啡色脸”,我以为我们已经过了那个阶段。” 后来更有网红“美丽求求你”与其兄拍片讽刺,但视频公开后,矛头转向网红,认为内容因涉及侮辱性语言与姿势,引来民众谩骂及警方的调查,要求撤下,内政兼律政部长尚穆根更出面斥责网红行径“已过界”,试图挑拨种族纷争,迫使网红兄妹二度道歉。 星网电子支付公司NETS与前创意公司及新传媒也出面公开表示,“广告以提倡电子支付为主,仅向公众表达“每个人都能使用电子付款”的用意,却造成伤害,感到十分抱歉。” View this post…