An advertisement created for epaysg.com, an e-payment website, was recently released featuring Mediacorp actor and DJ Dennis Chew impersonating different races.
In the advertisement, one can see Chew dressed up as different races in Singapore such as a Malay woman in a headscarf as well as an Indian man with darkened skin. He also portrayed the role of a Chinese woman in a pink jacket and a Chinese man with a moustache in the advertisement.

As expected, the ad did not go down too well with the public, with many criticising the need to use one person to play different roles instead of hiring people of the actual races to play the characters.
In response to the ad, Singaporean influencer and comedian Preeti Nair, famously known as Preetipls, along with her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, released a rap video calling out epaysg.com for being racist on Facebook and YouTube on Monday (29 June).
The video titled “K. Muthusamy” contains offensive content. In the video, the siblings can be seen repeatedly uttering “Chinese people always out here f***king it up”, while condemning Chinese Singaporeans who they claim are racist and exploit minorities for money.
On the other hand, Subhas was also dressed similarly to the brown-toned look by Chew in the original advertisement.
Some of the questions raised in the video include “How can a man wear brown and wear a tudung? Two wrongs don’t make a right” highlighting how it is not right for Chew to act as a Malay woman and an Indian man, as well as C.M.I.O which originally stands for Chinese, Malay, Indian and others, has now changed to “Cancel minority is ok!”.
The video also said that this is not the first time such an incident has happened as a previous Deepavali advertisement had a Chinese dressed up as a Sikh man.
But at the end of the video, as a disclaimer, Preeti said that “not all Chinese people are racist, only the racist ones ah”, indicating that they’re not slamming every Chinese Singaporean in the country.
Just two hours of posting the video, it had gotten 4,000 views and almost 150 shares on Facebook. However, by Tuesday afternoon, the video was taken down from Facebook and other social media channels. Both the original video as well as the re-uploaded ones have been taken down because of a complaint from the Government.

Mediacorp says sorry                     

After receiving flak from the public, Mediacorp in a statement given to The Sunday Times on 28 July, apologised for the advertisement.
The creative agency appointed for the advertisement, Havas Worldwide, and The Celebrity Agency (TCA), Mediacorp’s celebrity management arm said, “We’re sorry for any hurt that was unintentionally caused. Behind the ad is an initiative to provide greater convenience to consumers, merchants and small food business.”
It also explained the use of Chew for multiple characters.
“The message behind this advertising campaign is that e-payment if for everyone. For that reason, Dennis Chew, well-known for his ability to portray multiple characters in a single production in a light-hearted way, was selected as the face of the campaign. He appears as characters from different walks of life in Singapore, bring home the point that everyone can e-pay.”
The epaysg.com website later removed the controversial advertisement.

Police report made

Although the Government went quite lenient with Mediacorp for their distasteful advertisement, they did not let Preetipls off the hook that easily. On Tuesday (30 July), police said in a statement that they are aware of the siblings’ rap video and a report has been lodged against it.
“The police will not tolerate any offensive content that causes ill will between races,” the police said while highlighting that they are investigating the matter.

Law Minister’s response

Upon viewing Preetipls and her brother’s video, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shamugam also said that it “crosses the line” and is not acceptable.
Although Mr Shanmugam agrees that the epaysg.com advertisement was done “in poor taste”, but he said Preeti’s video did cross the line, nothing that he takes a “zero tolerance” approach to such matters. This is because he noted that if “speech, songs like this are allowed, slowly but surely, it will get worse.”
“This rap video insults Chinese Singaporeans, uses four-letter words on Chinese Singaporeans, vulgar gestures, pointing of middle finger, to make minorities angry with Chinese Singaporeans,” he said.
He added, “When you use four-letter words, vulgar language, attack another race, put it out in public, we have to draw the line and say not acceptable.”

He went on further to say that if someone doesn’t like content produced by another person, then they need to ask for an apology or lodge a police report.
“If (it was) something you didn’t like, then you ask for an apology. If you think it is criminal, you make a police report. You don’t cross the line yourself,” the Minister explained.
After reading the Government’s reaction towards Preetipls’s rap video along with her brother, netizens slammed the Government for their unfair treatment on ST’s Facebook page. They pointed out how Mediacorp got away for their advertisement with just an apology, but the sibling duo got a stronger reaction from the politicians.
Kirsten Han, the editor in chief of New Naratif, noted that “it’s just not fair when the majority gets to dictate what is just a bit of fun, and what is offensive”.

Others also voiced their support for the rap video and said that it is not offensive as it is funny, and the majority race in the country is “making up all the rules that perpetuate systemic racism”.






A bunch of netizens also said that Singaporeans are becoming very sensitive and can’t enjoy a simple joke. They mentioned that “people need to chill and have a sense of humour over little things in life.






However, other said that it’s not right to fight racism with racism. They said that replying to an offensive video with another offensive video is not the right way to do it. Some said that it’s best to stop the issue here and not allow a tit-for-tat reaction.



Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dengue cases shoot up by 29% after five weeks of decline

After five weeks of decline in the number of dengue cases recorded…

总理调高退休、重新雇佣年龄 淡马亚揶揄形同鼓励“工作致死”

今早,《联合早报》以《承前启后  克服天地局限》为题,报导总理李显龙的国庆群众大会演讲。总理阐述将在2021年起,逐步提高年长雇员公积金缴交率、未来100年气候暖化问题以及政府将确保学前教育费减低。 针对总理的国庆群众大会演说,新加坡民主党很快就录制视频回应,该党主席淡马亚揶揄调高退休和重新雇佣年龄,形同鼓励“工作致死”。 他说,国人原本期待总理能提出强而有力的建议,应对当前瞬息变幻社会和地缘政治的挑战,但不幸的是国人再次失望。 他表示,总理声称国人要工作到70岁, 但是根据新加坡移民关卡局2018年的统计,因主要死亡原因去世,华裔的死亡年龄中位数(median)为78.3巴仙、巫裔71巴仙以及印裔68.7巴仙。 淡马亚反问,总理也没有拿出理据,能够证明新加坡人难道真得并无意享受退休生活?没有探讨国人究竟愿不愿意花时间享受他们奋斗的果实、含饴弄孙、去做义工或者是有闲暇时间去旅行、玩玩麻将等等。 “反之,我们的总理和部长们坚持要我们一直工作到70岁。” 淡马亚说,曾经询问过前任人力部长,是否放心让一个已年届70岁的脑科医生做手术?还是乘搭由70岁老司机驾驶的公共巴士?但是该部长坚称,这些年长雇员可以接受在培训。 但是,淡马亚曾询问这些巴士司机和脑科医生,他们不认为自己到了那岁数还能再学习新事物,他们更希望能领取足以填补公积金的退休津贴。 教育方面,李显龙指政府目前在学前教育上每年10亿元的投资,下来几年将翻一倍。李总理指出,政府也将确保至少80%的学前教育学额由政府资助,与住房和医药一样给予高比率津贴。 不过,淡马亚指出,这反而让人想起新加坡人常说的自嘲谚语:“给你个鸡翅,拿走你整只鸡”。…

停车费都有差别待遇

今年8月起,教育部属下360所中小学和初级学院,教职员需缴付停车费,教育部长王乙康估计,每年预计可征收800-1千万元的停车收费,款项将悉数纳入学校资金。 事缘在2015年总审计署报告反映,有几所大专学府的停车费低于市价,认为这类做法等同“隐藏津贴”,不符合公共部门“裸薪”标准,引起教育部检讨。 教师被要求每个月为有盖停车位付100元,露天停车位则为75元,至于学校假期减少为15元。部长表示,这些收费将转入学校基金。 “向教职员征收停车费,也是符合公共服务部门“裸薪”(clean wage)准则,确保公务员并未享有“隐藏福利/津贴”。“ 人民代议士,停车有“优惠”? 不过,国会议员只需每年付还365元的执照,相当于每天只需付出一元,就能在全国范围任何建屋发展局组屋的停车位停车。 由于多数学校附近都有收费停车场,学校停车场只供教职员和特定访客使用,允许教职员免费停车涉及“应缴税的利益”(taxable benefit)。 然而, 每每国会议员和部长出勤,拜访组屋、商场或任何地方,免不了使用收费停车场,意味他们也涉及“应缴税的利益”,政府认为教师需符合“裸薪”标准,为何不适用在议员和部长身上? 试问,国会议员和部长,若按市价在国会、在公共场所缴交停车费,比起教师们贡献超过800万元的停车费用,可为国家带来多少的收入?…

Animal clinic collects wheel-clamp release fee of $300 despite not being authorised

Parked your car in a private space and had your car wheel-clamped?…