Minister of Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu said on Tuesday (10 December) that she did not find the controversial “brownface” advertisement that sparked public outrage earlier this year problematic.
The advertisement, which was an advertising campaign by e-payment firm Nets, featured Mediacorp actor and DJ Dennis Chew impersonating different races.
Mr Chew was seen dressed up as different races in Singapore such as an Indian man with darkened skin as well as a Malay woman in a headscarf in the advertisement. He also portrayed the role of a Chinese woman in a pink jacket and a Chinese man with a moustache in the advertisement.
As expected, the ad did not go down too well the public, with many criticising the need to use one person to play different roles instead of hiring people of the actual races to play the characters.
It even prompted Singaporean influencer and comedian, Preeti Nair, famously known as Preetipls, along with her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, to release a rap video attacking the video in vulgarities for being racist.
The video titled “K. Muthusamy” contains offensive content. In the video, the siblings can be seen repeatedly uttering “Chinese people always out here f***king it up”, while condemning Chinese Singaporeans who they claim are racist and exploit minorities for money.
On the other hand, Subhas was also dressed similarly to the brown-toned look by Chew in the original advertisement.
In response to this, Ms Fu said that she personally didn’t find the ad by Nets problematic because if were to look at it in the context that DJ Chew is someone who is known to cross-dress and portray multiple roles.
However, she did warn the public that they need to have sensitivity in knowing when not to cross the line.
“Does it make people angry, does it cause ill-will? If so, I think we should err on the side of caution,” Mr Fu noted.
The Minister told this while speaking to approximately 300 students at a dialogue on race relations during the OnePeople.sg Model United Nations opening ceremony held at Yishun Innova Junior College.
The OnePeople.sg Model United Nations is a yearly event that sees youths from the age 13 to 20 debate national cultural issues with the focus on racial and religious harmony. This year is its fifth edition.

Societal standards have changed

While at the dialogue, a student from Marsiling Secondary School asked Ms Fu if she could tolerate the publication of the “brownface” ad in her capacity as a Minister. The student also asked Ms Fu’s view on how she thought the Government handled the issue.
As a reply, Ms Fu explained that all Nets was trying to portray was how one single card can be used by people from all walks of life, regardless of their backgrounds.
She added that the incident is a great example of how societal standards have changed.
“What’s wrong and what was right in the past may not be wrong or right now. And I think we need to make adjustment in order to take into consideration the standard expected from the public,” she pointed out.
Ms Fu also went on to say that the characters portrayed in the “brownface” ad were not derogatory, but in fact just “ordinary folks” with different roles like a housewife and worker.
She also said that the majority of grassroots leaders and residents, including Indians, whom she sounded out on did not find the ad offensive.

Rap video is offensive

However, the rap video by Nair siblings was “a different question” as it used very foul language, the Minister said.
“If we said, ‘Okay, let’s not do anything about this’ – in the heat of the moment, if a Chinese made a similar rude video about minorities with profanity, what would that do to the relationship between the two races?” she asked.
Additionally, the Minister also highlighted that Ms Nair’s video channel had “made fun of Chinese New Year”, which could be interpreted as being insensitive.
The Minister stressed that apart from the Chinese cheongsam, she occasionally wears the Indian saris and Malay sarong kebayas, and hoped that they would not come a day where she wold not be able to do so.
“I really do not want to go to an extent where someone says ‘Okay, Minister, you are Chinese, you cannot wear a sari. Because a sari is not (part of) your race, your culture – and if you wear a sari, it is an appropriation of my culture. I really would not like to see that day,” she said.
She added, “I would like to see that we are celebrating our diversity.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

State banquet held in London for Singapore's President

Queen Elizabeth II gave a State Banquet at Buckingham Palace, London in…

Checks and balance needed for ISA to prevent abuse by an all-powerful government

Executive Chairman of Banyan Tree Holdings, Mr Ho Kwon Ping calls for more…

津贴、保险后医药费仍高 网友忧福利跟不上医疗通膨

一名网友分享友人郑瑞豪(译音)的住院经历,感叹老百姓虽然花钱买保险、还公积金保健储蓄(Medisave),然而真正需要时,获得赔偿额仍难以应付日益高涨的医药费。此事引起网民纷纷留言热议,认识到现有医疗津贴制和保险的局限。 该名网友以此事为例,认为在重度残障情况下,终身护保每月只赔600新元仍有不足,即使无病无痛,最后仍难以索回保费。特别是未来医疗费逐年调涨,我们的公积金、终身健保是否能减轻我们的负担? 郑瑞豪在2018年二月26日,突发心脏病和心脏骤停,在陈笃生医院接受治疗。有两天必须躺在加护病房,随后三天转到普通病房,并接受了气球血管扩张手术(PCI)和植入支架。 他说,政府只津贴1万4000元,终身健保则津贴了1万元,然而自己仅能从公积金保健储蓄(Medisave)提取4千073元,扣了上述数额,自己仍必须承担约1万3千元的医药费。 郑瑞豪在帖文中叹,自己的医药费并没有获得政府津贴65巴仙,医疗储蓄至少有5万2千积蓄,但在当下生死关头,却无用武之地。 一名网友还质疑此贴文的真伪,因为我国公民享用政府医院服务,不论住C级病房或手术,理应至少能得65巴仙津贴,不过郑瑞豪亲自解释,也将当时的医疗收据上载,给众网友评评理:他确确实实为整个治疗服了1万3千余元的医疗费。 郑瑞豪说,完整收据有6页,问题关键不在于每个单一事项,是否获65巴仙津贴,而是在总数额,能够获得多少津贴。“C级病房也没有电视、个人卫生用品和冷气等,我还要请家人带我的个人餐具和杯子。可是一晚住宿在津贴后,仍要价212元,即便是五星级酒店都没那么贵!” 网民Kumar则分享时事评论家Andrew Loh在2016年的境遇:接受血管造影侦测,和诊断是否适合进行血管扩张手术,医药费达1万0727新元。这笔费用或政府津贴6千767.90新元(约65巴仙),终身健保偿还720元,再扣除部分保健储蓄,Andrew先生只需付2千248新元。 至于Andrew的另一心脏绕道手术要价2万5千554新元,政府津贴高达80巴仙即2万0664元;Andrew再用终身健保偿还4千909元,剩余的380元只需用保健储蓄偿还,他根本不需再自掏腰包出一分钱。 (CGH=樟宜中央医院;KTPH=邱德拔医院;NHC=国家心脏中心;NTFGH=黄廷芳综合医院;NUH=国立大学医院;TTSH=陈笃生医院。图源来自卫生部官网) 政府提供基础安全网…

Online users slam MOE for providing misleading statistics and poor justification on scholarships for foreign students from India

It was reported that scholars from India under scholarships administered by the…