Singapore ministry of education plaque from Shutterstock.com

It was reported that scholars from India under scholarships administered by the Ministry of Education (MOE) would be arriving in Singapore this month and next month. They are essentially scholarship holders of A*STAR Youth Scholarship and SIA Youth Scholarship. Some would be going to Sec 3 while others to pre-university 1.
Since the announcement, there has been a constant buzz all over social media on the matter, with the majority of Singaporeans questioning why the government keeps giving scholarships to foreign students instead of helping the local students more.
Subsequently, MOE released a statement on its Facebook page last Thursday (5 Dec) in attempt to counter the negativity that were spilling online.
“There has been some discussion online and in messaging apps that MOE is recruiting only students from India through scholarships,” MOE wrote. It said that the government does provide a wide range of scholarships and financial aid, predominantly to Singaporeans.
“We also award a small number of scholarships to promising young international students from ASEAN countries, China and India. While here, they help promote goodwill and understanding among young people from different countries,” it explained.
MOE went on to say that “some” of these foreign students would eventually sink their roots here although it didn’t say how many. It said, “Over time, some have become PRs and citizens, sunk roots here, and contribute to Singapore.”
MOE disclosed that 0.9%, or close to 1%, of secondary and pre-university students are foreign students on scholarship.
“Only about 0.7% of these foreign students on scholarships are from India. So 0.7% of 0.9% – or 1 in 16,000 – are scholarship holders from India,” it said, and added that it would look into amending its websites, so as “not to give the impression that the scholarships only target students from a particular country”.
Interestingly, MOE’s Facebook statement, intended to imply some form of justification and cool the air, only brought more heat to the matter at hand upon garnering strong reactions from online users under the comment section.
Many of them slammed MOE for providing such scanty numbers and figures rather than laying out all the proper statistics to reveal the full picture.

Others wondered if the money spent on foreign students would be – or rather, should be – better spent on those who are born and bred here. They questioned whether or not these foreign students will positively contribute to the nation, adding that most of these foreign students have little to zero intention on doing so as they tend to reap the benefits and later move on.
 
What’s more, a few even pointed out that some of these foreign students “habitually display inconsiderate behaviours”.

Meanwhile, a couple of netizens also brought up the recent case of MOE holding back the PSLE results certificate from a financially-struggling family as they questioned the integrity of MOE for seemingly giving higher priority and benefits to foreigners.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

#FaithInLupCheong exposés the exposé

Just when you thought the whole Xiaxue versus Gushcloud expose and retaliation…

TOC focus week: Comments that endorse discrimination of migrant workers

by Vanessa Ho Let me begin this article by admitting I am…

Interview with deportees: Dinner with friends gone awry

The Online Citizen will be featuring a series of interviews with some…

国际特赦组织促政府撤回《防假消息法》

在我国国会在本周三(5月8日)通过《防假消息法》后,国际特赦组织(AI)随即在隔日发表声明,促请政府必须停止颁布法案,避免大大地缩减人民的言论自由。 该组织声明,由4月1日起提呈国会的《防假消息法》,以对抗“散播网路假消息者”,保障社会公众利益,已是默允政府持有不受约束的权力,钳制任何发布不利于政府的网络观点。 国际特赦组织东亚区主任轲霖(Nicholas Bequelin )斥责,新加坡曾有和平的批判声音当作刑事犯的不良记录。他认为,新加坡人民对于“制定法案旨在遏止网络言论”一事深感恐惧,因为这等于赋予政府权力审查批判性的政治言论。 轲霖说“这等于给予政府不受约束的权利,来审查充满批评与抗议的言论。法案并没有明确指出”真伪消息“的定义,甚至是”误导“的判断。 该法案于周三晚上10点,获得72票赞成、九票反对以及三票弃权,三读通过。对于提供假消息者,将依法裁定,可能获判最高10年监禁及罚款。 轲霖:政府能借机介入人民言论自由或管制传媒 该法案赋权部长,可要求社交媒体公司如脸书或推特移除可能含有“假消息”的内容。 轲霖认为,该法案赋予政府过多的权力,评断“假消息”的内容,并要求公司将其内容撤下。 他还说“这是一项人民需要警惕的现象,虽然科技公司有责任确保提供民众一个安全的数码空间,但并不表示政府能借机介入人民的言论自由或管制新闻媒体。” 他质疑,法案也是政府打击批政治批判言论的长期计划之一,透过对媒体设限,以及以刑事罪起诉维权人士,来抑制批判性言论。 国际特赦组织也举例,在去年举办的蓄意散播假消息国会特选委员会听证会,干扰人权维护者韩慧慧的自由言论,并罢免她出席听证会。…