Current Affairs
Netizens outraged and express frustration at HDB for being insensitive in providing housing to single mothers
Ms Chanel Koh, a single mother raising two children, had shared her woeful tale in a Facebook post that has gone viral, regarding her many challenges in find housing arrangements for her family of three.
In the Facebook post published on 12 Feb, Ms Chanel expressed her anger as she listed the challenges she had to face as a divorcee in trying to rent a flat with the Housing & Development Board (HDB).
She disclosed that her divorce was yet to be finalized and due to the existing terms and regulations imposed by HDB, she was restrained from doing anything and that significantly impacted her ability to care for her children.
The lengthy Facebook post recorded the many difficulties faced by Ms Channel beginning with her parentless upbringing, to being put in an abusive foster care system which affected her persona and led her to an abusive relationship with her ex-husband.
Last Tuesday (11 February), Ms Chanel was evicted and only with the help of her social worker from the Fei Yue Family Service Centre, a non-profit organisation, she has temporarily been placed in a home at Serangoon. This temporary placement is troublesome for Ms Chanel as she explains that she works at Henderson, located in Bukit Merah, whereas her schooling children attend Tradehub 21, near Jurong East.
Along with the Facebook post, Ms Chanel shared several screenshots of conversations with a HDB officer which led to no solution.
In connection with this, Mothership is said to be in communication with HDB for further clarification. HDB representatives affirmed that they have been working together with Fei Yue organization on Ms Chanel’s recent application for rental housing.
So far, there has been no response from HDB in regards to Ms Chanel’s case.
Netizens commenting on Mothership’s Facebook page were quick to jump in to express their disgruntlement with HDB’s housing allocation judgement.
A large majority, consisting of single mothers, recount their difficult stories in trying to find housing for their families. Some netizens opine that the law is biased and does not cater to the existential problems of single mothers.
Vanessa Koh, Kimmy Joy and Sheila Kamis say that HDB rules are against single mothers. The HDB promises to help but does not do much.
Vanessa Koh says that because she is unable to find housing with HDB, she was forced to move back in with her abusive, arrogant husband from whom she was separated.
Meanwhile, Sheila Kamis, another divorcee, claims that she had to find her own housing in the open market though financially she was hard-pressed.
Mother of two special needs children, Ms Karen Kailun, explains that she faces a similar situation and fears that she would soon be evicted as well. She highlights that she is not allowed to be included as current occupants in her aunt’s place. She also faces harassment from a neighbor. She says that the government agency does nothing to help people who are in these situations.
Others were also quick to chide HDB for their refusal to provide housing assistance during their time of need. At the same time, some netizens expressed that they have given up hope in HDB.
Siti Saad writes, “I had the same issue and even worse. I have my two aged parents with me. My appeal was rejected twice with the officer asking me to ‘stay with your family or relatives’. HDB is no longer for the people”.
In sync with this, netizens are outraged as they refer to HDB as heartless and unhelpful during dire times. They say Singapore’s family unit has changed over the years and pressures all around are causing breakups. But the government and HDB are blind to this. They seem to be operating on old family systems and values, say the netizens, leaving them stuck in their old procedures.
Eddie Tan writes, “Aiyo HDB officer do not care how sad is her stories is just follow the BOOK is YES mean can if no mean cannot then sorry and just close the door”.
Netizens, on behalf of Ms Chanel, appealed to HDB to reconsider their screening process and approve Ms Chanel’s housing application. Derrica Chuah reasons that despite her background, Ms Chanel is a good mother and deserves an opportunity to provide for her children. She appealed to the HDB to make an exception in regards to Ms Chanel’s case.
Current Affairs
Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.
SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.
This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.
Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.
He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.
Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.
The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.
These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.
These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.
Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.
Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.
Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.
On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.
The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.
Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.
According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.
CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.
Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.
Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.
Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.
He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.
Current Affairs
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.
On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.
Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.
According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.
Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.
He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.
In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:
- Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
- Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
- Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
- How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
- How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?
The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.
Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.
He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.
Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”
He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.
The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.
At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.
Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.
As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.
-
Comments7 days ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments3 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Crime2 weeks ago
Leaders of Japanese syndicate accused of laundering S$628.7M lived in Singapore
-
Current Affairs2 weeks ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore7 days ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore5 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore5 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home