Departure Board in Terminal 3 at Changi International Airport in Singapore. Changi Airport is one of the largest transportation hubs in Asia from Shutterstock.com

After the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) issued a travel advisory to all Singaporeans to defer any non-essential travel to Hong Kong last week, three major universities in the country have now decided to stop the student exchange programmes with their Hong Kong counterparts.
It is said that students at National University of Singapore (NUS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) and Singapore Management University (SMU) received email informing them of this decision, and the MFA advisory was attached or highlighted in the notice.
Based on the email sent to the students, NUS noted that it was “informed by the Ministry of Education” to hold its exchange programme to Hong Kong this semester. In addition, NTU students also got a similar email stating that “all exchange and trips to Hong Kong will be suspended with effect until further notice”.
It was reported earlier that NUS and NTU pointed out that a number of their students refused to go to Hong Kong for the exchange programme last week, however no students from SMU withdrew their trips despite the unrest in the city.
Upon reading this, TODAY said that it sparked a lot of responses from their readers who stressed that the Ministry of Education and universities should cease all exchange programmes to Hong Kong until the tensions settle.
For the last two months, there have been protests taking place in Hong against the Government, which have roiled the city and shows no signs of slowing down.
It all started as peaceful demonstration to oppose the controversial Extradition Bill, and even though the bill was later suspended indefinitely, but protests went on as people want greater democracy and political reforms.
The protests which saw clashes between protestors and the police recently went from bad to worse following fears of a crackdown by Chinese authorities.
A few affected students told TODAY that their biggest concern about the cancellation is how they are going to continue their studies during the semester on campus.
Mr Tham, a third-year student majoring in chemical engineering at NUS said, “We are trying to appeal to take our modules this semester and this is worrying because most of the slots are taken up by students who have bid for them”.
On the other hand, SMU undergraduate Jolene Tan mentioned that she is yet to receive her class schedule and course readings, but the semester has already started.
“Some classes are already full, but they told us to just attend them anyway while they try to slot us into whatever classes that are available,” she explained.
After reading the decision made by these three universities, many netizens wrote in TODAY’s Facebook page saying that they agree with the move and highlighted that the students safety should always be the priority.
 
In fact, Keynes Smith called for a permanent ban as Singaporean students will definitely not want to study in Hong Kong anymore.

However, a small number of online users said that the universities “overreacted” and “students are adults and can assess the situation on their own and make their own decisions” without the need of government’s interference.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Changi Airport Group warns public over ‘Be A Changi Millionaire’ scam calls received via Viber

On Wednesday (21 August), Changi Airport Group (CAG) released a statement alerting…

Chinese Muslim’s job application for admin role rejected because she “can’t eat pork”

By Ariffin Sha Ms Heidi Heng was left dumbfounded when she her job…

国会通过动议 要求刘程强、林瑞莲回避市镇会财务

经过超过四个小时激辩,国会今日(5日)以52票赞同、9票反对、两票弃权,通过副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰的动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。 九位工人党议员反对动议,至于官委议员王丽婷及特斯拉博士投下弃权票。 王瑞杰在以中文发言时强调“诚信是最重要的”,也多次引述高庭对林瑞莲等各造的宣判,指他们在理阿裕尼—后港市镇会事务上行为“不诚实”、“不透明”,违反受托责任。 “这场风波已历经八年,涉关几百万元公款。总审计署(AGO)的报告、毕马威(KPMG)和普华永道(PwC)提交的审计报告、由阿裕尼—后港市镇理事会自己委任的独立委员会发起的诉讼、以及高庭的听证, 都一一证明了两位议员犯下了过失。” 他指责工人党虽在2011年赢得阿裕尼集选区,理解他们希望委任一家可信任的公司管理市镇会,惟没有经过正确程序操作,即理应公开招标,评估投标公司。 王瑞杰重申议员应保持高标准诚信和责任感,也要求该党不该躲避,应对此做出解释。 “将近四周已过,但工人党仍保持沉默,未对此作出道歉,以及如何解决失误。”他也把问题抛向现任阿裕尼后港市镇会主席费沙和其他工人党议员,包括费沙会否对阿裕尼和后港居民道歉,以及解除林瑞莲作为市镇会副主席的职务。 他认为,如果直到上诉前什么都不做,那么可认定工人党实际上默许“不诚实和违反信托义务的行为”,甚至是共谋的。 有关市镇会从2011年7月至2015年7月间,支付了FMSS公司多达3370万元。这段期间,林瑞莲为市镇会主席,而刘程强当时为工人党秘书长。至于毕丹星当时担任市镇会招标与合约委员会成员。 去年10月初,高庭展开对工人党市镇会诉讼审讯,阿裕尼—后港市镇会(AHTC)和白沙—榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC)指责刘程强、林瑞莲、毕丹星等八造,必须对2011年5月至2015年11月期间,对第三方承包商的不当付款行为负起责任以及索偿。 林瑞莲:将上诉判决 不过林瑞莲也回应,他们将对有关市镇会诉讼判决提出上诉,且截止日是在下周一(11日),故此王瑞杰的动议似乎“言之过早”。…