Posting on Facebook this Tuesday, sociologist and member of the Worker’s Party Daniel Goh shared his experience with the homeless in Singapore. The associate professor posted a photo of a void deck at a flat somewhere in Singapore and shared a tale of a homeless man who had temporarily sought refuge there.

Assoc Prof Goh said, “A resident sent me a photo of a man resting here, curled up from the cold, surrounded by cardboard boxes and meagre belongings, a couple of shirts hanging from the metal grilles. I tried looking for him since, at different times of the day and night, but couldn’t find him.”

He then highlights various reasons a person might end up sleeping on the streets in Singapore – not being able to go home for one reason or another, rejecting assistance, people caught between jobs or long hours, some who just want to be left alone.

The WP member added, “I have searched and met a number of “homeless” persons while helping Mr Low with constituency work. A few residents see this as a municipal problem for the town council, the “homeless” an unwanted guest. Most feel sorry for those roughing it out in the elements but don’t know how to help them. It is a testimony that one stayed on long enough, as paramedics attended to a “homeless” man who fainted, to help me locate him later.”

He admits that he doesn’t really know how to help either, saying that he only try to talk to them and offer help.

Describing one encounter, he says “Once I dissuaded a man from setting up camp in a void deck as this affected residents there and fixed a day with him to drive and accompany him to MSF to seek assistance. But he cleared out and said he was going to go live with a friend.”

On another occasion, he has left a card for a man who was living in a disused study area in the void deck, but the man cleared out the next day, never reaching out.

Assoc Prof Goh said, “I don’t leave cards anymore; I just hope to meet them to talk.”

To some, reading this story might come as a surprise – that there are homeless people in shiny Singapore. But in fact, the Ministry of Social & Family Development said they assisted an average of 385 homelessness cases each year between 2015 and 2017.

Upon hearing this, many people subconsciously adopt stereotypes of homeless people, that they are lazy and/unemployed, which is how they ended up sleeping on the streets in the first place.

But according to a survey by welfare organisation Montfort Care and volunteer group SW101 in 2017, two third of the 180 street-sleepers who were interviewed said they have a job and more than 25% said they even have a flat to their name. A quarter of them are also married. The survey dispelled these stereotypes about homeless people in Singapore.

Homeless not from lack of trying

In an article, the Asia Law Network (ALN) pointed out that many people in Singapore end up homeless not because they are ‘lazy’ or ‘unemployed’. They argue that many tend to fall into trouble due to tenancy disagreements, poorly managed finances, cheating and fraud, or a lack of understanding of their legal rights.

ALN noted that the majority of people stuck in this difficult situation tend to be the elderly and those who are not highly educated.

The thing is, the current system is less than effective in helping people like this out of a tough situation, particularly when it comes to securing a home. Finding a place to stay is rather difficult for some people.

In an article (October 2017), TODAY interviewed several homeless people who had slept at the Bras Basah Complex. Three out of four of those interviewed by TODAY had camped at Bras Basah Complex at some point.

One person had told them that the Government’s rental housing schemed didn’t work for him as he had to live with a stranger. Another said he had a bad experience with a roommate from that same scheme.

While there are schemes and programmes out there with the intention of helping those in need secure housing, the eligibility criteria are often tough to meet. For example, the Fresh Start Housing Scheme which was intended to help former flat owners living in public rental flats to transition back into HDP  ownership misses the mark a little.

AWARE argues that for many single mothers, impoverishment and homelessness are pressing threats and they need immediate access to rental housing, not eventual access to housing ownership. One single mother told AWARE that she was regarded by HDB as “too well-off to qualify for a rental flat, but too poor to buy a flat.” Those in this situation end up having to rent homes in the open market, dipping into whatever savings they have. At the end of the 30-month debarment period, many will have become poor.

Moreover, the criteria that these people need to meet to be eligible for assistance under Fresh Start includes continuous employment and regular school attendance.

Simple though that may sound, AWARE points out that poverty itself often leads to gaps in employment and schooling which in turn makes them ineligible for assistance.

Single mothers have a hard time securing continuous employment when they need to take care of their children, especially children with disabilities and it’s difficult to maintain steady schooling when you’re shuffling around different living arrangements regularly. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle.

Those who do work often find themselves falling into financial hardship because when they earn more income, the price of HDB rental housing often goes up. This makes it difficult for them to accumulate any savings at all.

Worse still, if a single mother starts working, subsidies drop on the assumption that she can immediately pay for all her children’s expenses but that doesn’t take into account the extra expenses necessary when working such as transport and meals.

A system that wants to help but isn’t quite as efficient

Another example if that of elderly Singaporean Mr Lim Kee Khoon who was sleeping in the Henderson Hawker Centre for two months as he had trouble finding a place to live with his brother.

The 70-year old used to live in a rental flat that he was forced to share with a stranger, ah elderly gentlemen. His flatmate had apparently suffered a stroke earlier in his life leaving him partially disabled, meaning Mr Lim suddenly became his flatmate’s de facto caretaker and had to take on the extra financial burden.

Desperate for money as he could not take on a normal job, Mr Lim resorted to working as a drug courier. He was caught and sentenced to 10 years in jail at 63-year old. He was released early at 70 for good behaviour.

After prison, Mr Lim tried apply for a rental flat with his brother. Unfortunately, his brother had sold a flat 8 years ago and the officers whom Mr Lim spoke with said that his brother has to wait another 2 years before they are eligible to rent together.

Political activist Brad Bowyer who highlighted Mr Lim’s case on social media described Mr Lim as a victim of ““poorly conceived rules” and “institutionalised and systematic neglect”.

No one was really helping and Mr Lim was stuck. Mr Bowyer highlighted how Mr Lim’s cries for help to the Tanjung Pagar MP Joan Pereira and HDB were left unanswered.

Responding to the claims, the Housing Development Board (HDB) came forward to say that Singapore’s Social Service Office (SSO) had been in touch with Mr Lim and were trying to provide assistance.

SSO said they tried to offer help but were declined several times while Tanjung Pagar MP Joan Pereira said that various government agencies have been in touch with Mr Lim to offer assistance.

Speaking to TOC, Mr Lim verified Mr Bowyer’s version of events. He also explained that that he was told to seek shelter at a halfway house but he rejected the offer because he didn’t want to get back into bad company again. He just wanted to get back into a normal life.

Mr Lim shared that he was being passed from one agency to another and eventually had to seek shelter at the market and got goodwill assistance from members of public who pitied him.

This story does have a happy ending though, as Mr Lim’s application to share a rental flat has since been processed with the help of a Mr Yip Kum Fei from HDB and his team. He now lives in a modest flat with his brother who has started working as a cleaner.

Mr Lim said to TOC in the previous meet up that all the help he needs from the government is to have a roof over his head so that he can concentrate on working to make ends meet.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ESM Goh says the ruling party should have 75-80% majority in Parliament to allow for long-term planning

Speaking to Chinese daily Lianhe Zaobao as reported by Straits Times, ahead…

【冠状病毒19】确诊者曾造访白沙浮广场、黄亚细肉骨茶

根据卫生部7月31日文告,新增冠病19确诊者曾到访地点如下: 1)7月25日晚上10点30分至26日午夜12点30分:惹兰苏丹(Jalan Sultan)200号的Al-Sahira餐厅 2)7月26日下午12点50分至下午3点40分:白沙浮广场的阿迪达斯(Adidas)专卖店和肯德基餐厅 3)7月28日中午12点至1点:仰光路(Rangoon Road)208号的黄亚细肉骨茶 卫生部提醒若有民众与确诊病例,曾在同一时段到访上述地点,应密切留意自己的健康状况。若出现急性呼吸道症状、发烧或失去味觉或嗅觉,应尽快求诊并告知医生曾去过地点。 与确诊病例密切接触的人应该已收到当局的通知。 另一方面,昨日新增三例入境病例中,包括一名新加坡籍六岁女童,和一名,13岁男性永久居民,分别在本月3日和19日,从印度返回新加坡。另一名持直系亲属证件的印度籍女子,则是在本月19日抵新。

未彻底消毒器具事件 18陈笃生医院牙科职员遭惩戒

陈笃生医院牙科诊所误用未彻底消毒器具事件,国立健保集团对18名包括主管在内、涉及未遵守安全守则的职员,采取纪律行动和辅导,予以警告和金钱上的惩罚。 有关职员也被勒令参与再培训和课程。 卫生部上个月发文告透露,陈笃生医院牙科诊所被发现,有八套牙科器具,没有经过第四个、即蒸汽消毒的步骤。而受影响的病患是在去年11月28日至12月5日之间,到该医院牙科诊所就医。 这段期间到陈笃生医院牙科诊所的病患共575名,使用没彻底消毒牙具的病人可能多达八人,他们有被细菌感染的风险,但院方强调受感染可能性“微乎其微”。 国立健保集团检讨委员会提呈调查报告,指出此事属人为疏忽。有职员把这些牙具放入高压蒸汽机器,却没启动蒸汽消毒的最后消毒步骤。再取出使用时也未再确认是否完全消毒。 在12月7日证实有关器具未完全消毒,院方通知了同期间到诊所接受治疗的575个病患,向他们解答他们的担忧。有关牙科诊所的一些治疗程序也从12月8日至12日暂停,以对所有牙科器具进行完整检验和消毒。 院方也落实额外的管控措施,确保消毒过程严格遵守作业程序。 国立健保集团总裁朱伟仁对此事致歉,并表示病患的安全是他们的首要考量,已采取相关措施、加强安全管制,避免类似事件重演。 去年6月12日,我国最大的全国牙科中心,被揭发至少在72名病患身上,使用未完全消毒的牙科器具。当月到该牙科中心看诊的病患,就多大714人。 事件发生后,卫生部针对所有有牌公立和私立医疗机构的中央消毒供应部门(CSSD)进行审查,以评估是否符合规定的消毒程序。经审计结果显示,所有消毒程序都达标。