Financial advisor and Singaporean blogger Leong Sze Hian is set to defend himself against Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s defamation suit against him.

Speaking to TOC on Wednesday (12 Dec) after having entered an appearance to the defamation suit, Mr Leong said that while he is “unable to comment” on his ongoing case “for legal reasons”, he hopes that “Singaporeans will get their answers now” to questions regarding government spending and other significant issues.

Mr Leong illustrated: “For example, why is Singapore the only Government in the world that – from a cashflow perspective – does not spend any money on pensions, public housing and healthcare,” adding that “the inflows exceed the outflows annually in these areas?”

He added that he has written “a few thousand articles, newspaper forum letters, speeches and protests” in the last two decades in a bid to seek “transparency and accountability” from the Singapore Government “without any substantive response”.

When asked by TOC regarding legal representation in his defence against the suit, Mr Leong said that he will be representing himself.

“I have the best counsel – the people of Singapore,” he concluded.

Mr Leong is being sued by PM Lee over a post he shared on his Facebook profile on 7 Nov.

The allegedly defamatory post in question was a post from Malaysia site, TheCoverage.my which quoted content originating from States Times Review (STR) (“Lee Hsien Loong becomes 1MDB’s key investigation target”), published on 5 Nov.

The post claimed that the editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report (SR) Clare Rewcastle-Brown pinpointed Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

The claim was subsequently rebuked by SR as “misleading” and “erroneous”, and a request was made to STR to “correct the false claim.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

议员质问国际化新加坡如何应对“外国影响” 尚穆根重申政党、政治人物、媒体不得接受外国资金

官委议员特斯拉博士与王丽婷,双双在国会质问内政部,如何确认和应对“外国势力干预”的威胁?王丽婷也质问当局是否能公开那些可能面对上述风险的组织/个人名单?乃至于必须规定媒体只能由本地人担任? 至于特斯拉则在提问中指出,有鉴于新加坡企业和个体大多全球化,因此接受/有外国资源往来是很普遍的,在这前提下,又该如何保护国人免受“外国势力影响”? 内政冀律政部长尚穆根则回应,这并不意味着要回避所有的外国影响,而主要是对付那些可能破坏社会、削弱国家或影响外交政策的外国影响,他指出所有国家都会如是保护自身。 特斯拉续表达他的担忧,质疑在评估所谓外国影响的风险,是否应考量他们的所作所为或倡议观点,而不是仅根据是否接受外国资金,或外籍人士掌握敏感职位等。因为如果过早下定论,反而阻遏作为国际化社会的新加坡人去和外界交流。 尚穆根解释,现有法律禁止,那些将代表本土新加坡人参选的本地政党和政治人物,接受外国资金,但不代表组织他们参与国际观点讨论;但他强调在《报章与印刷法》下,禁止由外国人资助或掌握本地报纸。 “确保我国政治环境免受外国影响” “更广义来说,是确保我国政治环境、政治进程免受外国人影响,多年来也推出一系列相关法令,我想新加坡人接受这点。美国人也能接受这点。” 他以《东方日报》(Eastern Sun)和《新加坡先驱报》(Singapore Herald)为例,指由虎标万金油创办人胡文虎长子胡蛟筹办的《东方日报》,接受在香港设办公处的中共新闻机构的600万贷款办报;创办后再接受120万元,条件是委任中方顾问;让中方可掌控本地媒体,在狮城建立间谍网。 《东方日报》在1966年创刊,面向当时在地的英语读者市场。在1971年5月新加坡政府在针对媒体的“黑色行动”中,除了《南洋商报》包括前总经理李茂成、总编等人被捕,当时《东方日报》也被指遭中方利用控制。 尚穆根强调新加坡政治应由新加坡人负责,他不反对国人在经济、学术或政治上与外国交流,惟者有别于领取外国资金或允许他人左右行政。…

Foreign worker dormitories with active COVID-19 clusters linked to PA grassroots leaders

It was reported that as of Wed (8 Apr), active COVID-19 clusters…

Number of children born to unmarried mothers has dropped since 2006

Mr Kok Heng Leung, a nominated member of Parliament, asked the Minister…

Improved monetary benefits, revised IPPT format and civilian conversion scheme to improve NS

The Ministry of Defence made a number of announcements yesterday, including changes…