Comments
Netizens slam SNOC’s ‘nitpicking’ of Soh Rui Yong’s case, accusing them of trying to make a mountain out of a molehill
Netizens responded with confusion and criticism as the Singapore National Olympic Council excluded Soh Rui Yong, two-time SEA Games marathon champion, from representing Singapore in the upcoming Asian Games. They questioned the council’s decision to penalize Soh for what they deemed trivial remarks, describing the SNOC’s 30-page document as “nitpicking” and exaggerating minor issues.
SINGAPORE — Recently, local, long-distance runner Soh Rui Yong was once again excluded by the Singapore National Olympic Council (SNOC) from representing Singapore in sports.
Soh was deprived of the opportunity to contest in the upcoming Asian Games to be held in Hangzhou, China, from 23 September 23 to 8 October.
Soh, a two-time SEA Games marathon champion, had earlier returned to representing Singapore at the Cambodia SEA Games after his appeal was finally granted by SNOC, securing a silver medal in the 10,000m race. Soh had not been selected to represent Singapore since 2019 following several public clashes with SNOC and its officials.
Despite meeting the Asian Games qualifying mark in the same distance, Soh’s name was absent from the SNOC’s latest list of successful appeals.
A spokesman for the SNOC confirmed to the Straits Times that Soh’s nomination by Singapore Athletics (SA) was considered and ultimately rejected.
The SNOC has claimed that Soh failed to honour commitments made to the council, including those following his participation at the Cambodia 2023 SEA Games.
They provided a 30-page document detailing the problematic posts from March to May 2023 and a six-page document on Soh’s comments made on a podcast by Shasi Kumar, a former professional footballer, as the Straits Times has reported.
Regarding the podcast, SNOC took issues with matters including Soh’s comment on religion, his use of an expletive during a marathon anecdote, joking about a teammate’s emotional attachment to the national anthem, his reflection on reasons for non-selection in a previous SEAG, and discussions on sportsmanship.
SNOC also had concerns about Soh’s remarks on code of conduct rules, past controversies, personal interactions, and criticism of certain social media accounts.
It raised concerns over 23 posts made by Soh between March and May 2023.
For example, SNOC took issue with Soh’s criticism of his fellow runner Ashley Liew, his actions of cutting holes in his singlet during the 2017 SEA Games, his response to a comment about taxpayer funding, and his references to controversies surrounding his non-selection.
In an Instagram post where Soh appeared in a photo with Workers’ Party’s Jamus Lim, a comment tagged Tan Chuan-Jin, asking whether he had unblocked Soh. Soh responded, “I prefer not to speak, if I speak I’m in big trouble.”
Netizens questioned why penalize Soh for what they considered to be trivial remarks
However, upon seeing the news, numerous netizens took to The Straits Times’ Facebook post to express their confusion and questioned why the SNOC would penalize Soh for what they considered to be trivial remarks.
For instance, one netizen highlighted the contrast that on the one hand government encourages citizens to be entrepreneurial and “think out of the box”, but at the same time, they seem to suppress those who speak out and don’t conform to the established norms.
“SNOC playing the rank and ego game and showing all athletes who is their boss, ” the comment wrote.
Another netizen expressed his surprise at the extent of scrutiny given to the runner, adding that instead of excluding Soh, he should be allowed to compete in the Asian Games, as facing stronger competitors would naturally humble Soh.
One comment suggested that the extensive 30-page document indicates a lack of strong, valid reasons to justify Soh’s denial.
“Trying to make a mountain out of a molehill”
Other netizens expressed their view on the SNOC’s list, stating that they found it to be nitpicking and an attempt to blow minor issues out of proportion.
A netizen sarcastically advises Soh to “start praising the SNOC in every social media post”
Another netizen offered sarcastic advice to Soh, suggesting that he should learn a lesson and start praising the SNOC in every social media post to improve his chances of winning a gold medal for Singapore.
Netizens called out SNOC’s behaviour of policing online behavior of athletes as “childish and kiddy”
Others criticized the SNOC for what they perceived as “policing” the online behaviour of athletes:
A netizen also expressed strong disapproval of the SNOC, describing their behaviour as childish and kiddy.
He reflects a sense of embarrassment and cringes at the idea of having individuals with such characteristics leading the national sports body.
However, another individual commended the SNOC for taking a strong stance, arguing that allowing someone like Soh, whom they considered a “loose cannon”, to be part of the team would only encourage “rebellion” among other athletes.
The netizen refuted the comment and emphasized that respect is something that is earned, not demanded, unless in an enforced structure like the army.
Former NCMP urged SNOC to focus on athletic achievements rather than social media conduct
Earlier, Former Non-Constituency Member of Parliament, Yee Jenn Jong, urged the SNOC to focus on athletic achievements rather than social media conduct.
“Just let sports people do their work and stop stalking them on social media. Let him who has no sin cast the first stone. So tired of such petty bans, over social media comments which most people would have missed out anyway if not for some on the throne casting judgments. ”
“I have no clue what the offending comments even are. We don’t need them to be saints, just athletes,” said Mr. Yee on his Facebook page.
Teo Soh Lung, an activist in Singapore, expressed her disbelief at the SNOC’s decision, describing it as “simply absurd” and suggesting political interference in sports.
Ms Teo questioned the SNOC’s reference to supporting and rehabilitating Soh, sarcastically suggesting that they wanted him to apologize to a politician.
“Rehabilitate what? Advise him to apologise to the politician in SNOC? Come on. Taxpayers want SNOC to send the best runner to the Asian Games.”
Comments
LHL’s 15-minute visit to Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake raises eyebrows among Singaporeans
On the evening of 10 October, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, attended Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake, staying for about 10-15 minutes. This brief visit sparked online discussions about the custom of family members remaining throughout the day at funerals.
On Thursday evening (10 October), Singapore’s mainstream media, stationed outside Singapore Casket where Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake was held, reported the arrival of Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, to attend his sister’s funeral.
Dr Lee, the daughter of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, at her family home at 38 Oxley Road.
Her wake is being held at Singapore Casket from 10 October to 12 October.
According to Lianhe Zaobao, SM Lee and Mdm Ho arrived outside Singapore Casket at around 8.30 pm.
They reportedly stayed at the wake for about 10 minutes and did not provide any comments to the media.
In contrast, the South China Morning Post reported that SM Lee and Mdm Ho stayed for approximately 15 minutes before leaving.
A member of the public who paid respects to Dr Lee shared with TOC that SM Lee had written a simple “RIP” in the condolences book.
Mr Li Yipeng, the eldest son of Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, also attended Dr Lee’s wake earlier.
Observing comments on social media, some users questioned the brevity of SM Lee’s visit to his sister’s wake.
One user remarked that even attending a friend’s funeral typically lasts at least 30 minutes, asking, “Where can you find a brother who attends his sister’s funeral for just 15 minutes?”
Others pointed out that it is customary for family members to stay the entire day at a funeral, particularly the eldest brother, who usually greets visitors and offers hospitality, such as refreshments.
“That’s what family members do,” one user noted.
A netizen lamented that instead of receiving guests at his sister’s wake, LHL appeared as a VIP guest accompanied by bodyguards.
Another user expressed sadness over the situation, noting that the eldest brother was attending the wake like any other outsider.
The comment highlighted that Lee Hsien Yang, the younger brother, was organizing the funeral remotely and could not return.
This led to a broader question among netizens: Would LHL attend his own brother’s funeral if he were to pass first?
Some netizens disagreed with the criticism of LHL’s attendance at his sister’s wake, arguing that, regardless of public sentiment towards the government, this is a personal matter.
One comment emphasised the need for objectivity, stating that people cannot judge LHL solely based on appearances or media reports.
He questioned what LHL might have done for his sister behind the scenes and pointed out that even if he had stayed longer, some would still find fault with his actions.
A comment on Reddit expressed that while LHL doesn’t necessarily need to be invited, his absence from receiving mourners as the eldest family member suggests he was not asked or instructed to participate in the funeral proceedings at all.
A netizen lamented that family disputes deeply affect one’s soul, particularly when reconciliation with a sibling is impossible, even in death.
The Reddit comment emphasised the emotional pain that arises from being reminded of happy childhood moments during such difficult times.
Comments
Netizens: Was Ho Ching smirking before entering Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral?
On 10 October at around 8.30 PM, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, were spotted arriving at Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral. While Singaporeans mourned Dr Lee’s passing, some netizens, after viewing media footage, questioned whether Mdm Ho was smirking before entering the funeral.
Dr Lee Wei Ling, the daughter of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, at her family home at 38 Oxley Road.
Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), Dr Lee’s brother, announced her passing on social media, and had earlier requested that the wake and funeral remain a private affair.
He also noted that respects could be paid on a strict queue basis, adding, “There will be no exceptions, not even for VIPs,” to ensure that everyone is treated equally during the visitation period.
The wake is being held at the Pearl & Sapphire Hall of Singapore Casket, located at 131 Lavender Street, Singapore. Public visitation is open from 2 PM to 10 PM on 10 October, and from 10 AM to 10 PM on 11 October. The final visitation period is scheduled for 10 AM to 1 PM on 12 October.
Despite the request for privacy, mainstream media (MSM) representatives have gathered outside the Singapore Casket building.
MSM reporters are focused on whether Dr Lee’s elder brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, will attend her funeral.
On Thursday (10 October ) at around 8.30pm, MSM spotted Senior Minister Lee and his wife, Ho Ching, entering Singapore Casket.
According to Lianhe Zaobao, SM Lee and his wife stayed at the wake for about 10 minutes and did not provide any comments to the media.
Comments on social media pages of various media outlets show Singaporeans pouring in with condolence messages, remembering Dr Lee’s contributions to Singapore’s medical field.
They praised her as a low-profile and modest woman, despite being a President’s Scholar and the Head of the Neurology Department.
Many noted how much she resembled her mother, who also shunned the limelight, even at their funerals.
However, some netizens, after viewing videos and photos taken by mainstream media, questioned whether Mdm Ho Ching was smirking before entering Dr Lee’s funeral.
Netizens Urge Media and Public to Give Grieving Family Space
Some netizens disagreed with the speculation surrounding Mdm Ho Ching’s expression in the media footage, urging others to refrain from making unfounded assumptions.
They called for compassion, emphasizing the need to give the grieving family some space.
Some netizens also recalled the Lee family feud surrounding the 38 Oxley Road house, where Dr Lee and LHY accused their brother, SM Lee, of opposing their father’s wish to have the house demolished after his passing.
One netizen lamented the strained relationship within the Lee family, questioning why there was supposed to be a sense of family, yet it felt more like guests attending the wake.
Another commented on the fact that SM Lee and his wife attended the wake rather than being involved in arranging it, especially given that Dr Lee was unmarried and their parents are no longer around, “it says alot about their relationship.”
One netizen speculated that Dr Lee might be SM Lee’s greatest regret in life, as he had failed to mend his relationship with her.
The comment added, “Attend or not attend his sister’s wake doesn’t really matter since the person had already gone.”
Meanwhile, some netizens questioned the media’s actions, pointing out that despite LHY’s request for no media coverage, reporters were still camping outside Dr Lee’s funeral.
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Comments1 week ago
Netizens push back on Ho Ching’s 8-10 million population vision and call for more foreigners
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Commuters face service disruption on TEL due to train fault following 6-day EWL disruption
-
Comments1 week ago
Dr Chee Soon Juan criticises Ho Ching’s vision for 8-10 million population
-
Singapore1 week ago
PM Lawrence Wong reaffirms government’s commitment to integrity after ex-minister Iswaran’s jail sentence
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
SMRT privatization: Shielding information or strategic restructuring?