Prof Peter Coclanis

In an opinion piece published by the Straits Times on Sat, American Prof Peter Coclanis wrote that Singaporeans should think again when they complain, given that Singapore is a “pretty good place to live”, all things considered (‘Singaporeans, you think you’ve got problems? Think again‘, 31 Jul).

Prof Coclanis is Albert R. Newsome Distinguished Professor of History and director of the Global Research Institute at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. He has lived and taught in Singapore, and often visits Singapore.

“It doesn’t take a visitor long to appreciate the fact that Singaporeans are perhaps most comfortable while complaining and, as a result, have developed the verbal remonstrance into something akin to an art form – or national sport,” Prof Coclanis pointed out.

He observed that Singaporeans would complain about anything – rising prices, hyper competition, the performance of the Government, the weather, reckless drivers, litterers, poor service, crowded trains, etc.

The complaints “provide much of the soundtrack for one’s visit, no matter how short or long”, he joked.

Prof Coclanis, however, conceded that there may be some legitimate grounds for Singaporeans to complain. “After granting that there is generally a performative aspect to the complainants’ whines – especially for easy-to-fool ang mohs like myself – Singaporeans do have some legitimate grounds for complaints,” he said.

“The country is extremely competitive and the pace of change is relentless. Wages, especially for low earners, don’t always keep up with prices, the Government can be overbearing at times, and the humidity is often stifling.”

Prof Coclanis also conceded that some of the complaints do provide useful feedback to the government, leading in many cases to “meaningful policy changes without the need for organised protest, much less political violence”.

Putting Singaporeans’ complaints in perspective

Still, Prof Coclanis asked Singaporeans to take stock, especially around the time of National Day. In his article, he attempts to put Singaporeans’ complaints in perspective.

He listed a few contextual points for Singaporeans to keep in mind whenever “they get the urge to let out a wail”:

  • Singapore is a global leader in socioeconomic measures such as: GDP per capita, life expectancy (high), infant mortality (low), home ownership rates, proportion of income spent on food (low), school quality and educational performance, quality of healthcare, and composite measures such as the Human Development Index.
  • Singapore has low taxes, ranks highly in global competitiveness, safety and honesty, and the World Happiness Report (32nd in 2020).
  • Singapore has “very high ranking” on the 2020 Human Development Index (tied for 11th).
  • Singapore’s income inequality is lower than in cities like New York, London and Hong Kong.
  • Singapore ranked 6th among the 80 countries rated in the most recent rankings, for children born in 2013, in the Economist Intelligence Unit’s (EIU) Where-to-be-born Index.
  • Singapore’s passport is ranked the second strongest in the world, behind only Japan.

Singapore isn’t perfect but, as most Singaporeans “know deep down”, it’s a pretty good place to live, all things considered, Prof Coclanis claimed.

“Maybe all that complaining helps. Keep up the good work,” Prof Coclanis concluded his article in jest.

Singaporeans struggling to find jobs

Meanwhile, while Prof Coclanis was jetting between US and Singapore, it was reported last week (27 Jul) that many Singaporean workers in their 40s or 50s belonging to the “Sandwich Generation” are facing tremendous pressure when they were let go. Many resorted to seeking help from the government to get a job.

One such job seeker was 47-year-old Mohd Nasir Ja’apar who used to work as a senior quality engineer for an oil and gas company. He was let go last April.

“I vividly recall the sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach as if it happened yesterday… Being ‘unwanted’ was how I felt, and my mind was desperately racing with thoughts on how I would face my family and friends,” he shared.

Mr Nasir spent the next four months applying to more than 60 jobs in pharmaceutical, chemicals, semiconductor and other sectors. But replies were slow to come; if any did, it was to inform him that his application had been unsuccessful.

He sought help from the government’s agency WSG’s Careers Connect, which eventually got him a job with an SME specializing in additive manufacturing. He was offered a position as senior quality engineer and had to undergo a six-month professional conversion programme, in which his salary was partly subsidized by the government.

Another middle-aged Singaporean, Ms June Bee Ling, 48, lost her job as a helpdesk officer in June last year. Fifty job applications and three interviews later, she was still drawing a blank. And like Mr Nasir, she had to seek help from the government.

Eventually in March this year, she got a job as an implementation specialist for a workforce management software company.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
64 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Supply of eggs to Singapore is uninterrupted by Malaysia’s lockdown, says Minister Chan

Trade and Industry Minister Mr Chan Chun Sing was at Changi Airport…

诬陷撞狗逃致使司机遭网络霸凌 爱狗人士被判罚款1400元

因为不忍收容所狗只被撞,爱狗人士未查明肇祸司机身份时,便发视频呼吁网民找出涉事者背景和“公审”,却导致无辜司机莫名被攻击和网络骚扰,涉嫌抵触《防止骚扰法令》,被判罚款1400元。 该名被告为27岁林有成(译音)昨日(7日)被控涉嫌两项《防止骚扰法令》,导致41岁的女司机倍受其扰。他向其中一项控状认罪,而另一项控状则交由法官下判时一并考虑,最终被判处1400元。 2016年10月23日早上10点30分左右,巴西立第三农道的动物爱好者联盟(Animal Lovers League)收容所外发生轿车撞狗车祸,当时黑色轿车在撞到收容所的狗后还将狗碾压过去,期间该名肇祸司机没有下车查看,反而是车轮胎的档污牌多次打到狗的身体上,让它在车底下挣扎。 被告是该动保团体的联合创始人兼执行董事,同时身兼志愿者。 当时收容所的义工目睹了案发经过,便向司机挥手停下,但司机却只抛下一句,“只不过是一条狗而已”,还骂了脏话便离去。 义工愤愤不平,发视频到网络 义工对意外发生愤愤不平,将视频放到网络上扬言要找出女司机,并在帖文下写到,“请帮我们找出肇祸女司机,社会是不能容忍这种残忍的行为。” 最后帖文被大量转载,还上了《The Independent 》,以及《…

HK protests hit Watson's business derailing Temasek's US$3b Watson sale to potential buyers

Bloomberg reported yesterday (3 Sep) that potential investors have backed off buying…

SPF: Overall crime in Singapore decreased by 2.6 percent

Singapore Police Force has announced that overall crime decreased by 2.6 percent,…