Source: PAP / Facebook

A two and the half minute political campaign video showed multiple scenes where children of preschool and primary school age were engaged in the introductory video of the People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate Sun Xueling. 

She will be contesting in the Punggol West single-member constituency against the Workers’ Party Tan Chen Chen. 

Uploaded on PAP’s Youtube channel on Tuesday (30 June), a young boy of preschool age, donning the PAP Community Foundation (PCF) Sparkletots t-shirt, was seen walking alongside a woman pushing a stroller under a sheltered walkway in a Housing Development Board estate, and in front of a Sparkletots branch. 

PCF Sparkletots is one of Singapore’s largest preschool operators and employers.

At one point, the toddler in the pram makes a cameo. 

Ms Sun speaks in the background throughout these scenes where she shares how she “wants to help create these beautiful memories” for families and their children.

In other follow-up scenes, Ms Sun is interacting with adults and children of primary school age who are familially related or playing the role of a family. 

Near the end of the video, a group of Sparkletots preschoolers run forwards into the outstretched arms of Ms Sun as she embraces them in a hug. 

Under the Parliamentary Elections Act, “persons attending a primary or secondary school as a student are prohibited from conducting election activity”. 

On Thursday (2 June), PAP’s Ong Ke Yung released a statement that he has taken down a campaign video, which showed him speaking with a young boy attending primary school, because “he was informed by authorities that this is not in line with electoral rules”. Mr Ong is contesting the Sembawang Group Representation Constituency, where they will face the National Solidarity Party.

The ground sentiments are whether Ms Sun’s PAP campaign video violated the rules too.

TOC has reached out to the Elections Department for a comment.

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Livefeed: NUSS political forum

Tweets about #sgelections from:getocsg since:2015-08-18

证券投资者协会抛23问题质问凯发集团

新加坡证券投资者协会(SIAS)代表证券投资者,向凯发集团(Hyflux)董事会致函,对该集团的运营、估值和董事会信用责任问题表达严正关注,罗列23道问题,以让证券持有人知情并作出明智决定。 在由该协会主席大卫杰乐署名的信函提到,债权人和投资者们们整理出一些问题,要求凯发集团董事会回答,包括几乎所有凯发资产都存在严重缺陷,例如在阿曼 Qurayyat和Magtaa的海水淡化厂有运作缺陷,无法达到营运容量;大泉水电厂和天津大港新泉海水淡化厂蒙受亏损,以及Tuasone和阿尔及利亚的Tlemsen项目无法完成。 投资者质问凯发董事会,究竟对这些主要资产进行了怎样的监管?为何这些严重缺陷却没有在年报上公布? “凯发筹集了五亿新元的永久债券和四亿元的优先股,这些资金要如何使用?对比招股说明书的实际使用情况又是如何?”债权人也质问,来自股东500万元的贷款如何使用在大泉水电厂上。 负现金流仍支付股息 与此同时,凯发集团自2009年以来就呈现负运营现金流。但有没有把这种情况告知债权人和股东?何以在负现金流下仍能继续支付股息,至累积更多债务?在2017年前每年都报告盈利而非亏损,令投资者直问:这怎么可能? 协会也要求凯发出示大泉水电厂的现金储备和现有市值,并且质疑它的14亿元账面价值被高估了。”事实上,在2018年,凯发曾接受比马银行五亿元债务耕地的脱售献议,故此至少高估了九亿元。“再者,投资者们也不认为电价低是导致该厂亏损的原因。 亏损时总裁仍获高额薪酬 与此同时,协会也质疑当股东和债权人都在蒙受投资亏损时,总裁林爱莲仍能从34巴仙普通股权中获得6千万元的股息。在2017年的薪酬和分红分别达到75万元和1百万元。同年,凯发却亏损高达1亿1560万元。在这不久的五个月后,凯发集团就因为亏损巨额资金和建筑项目,向法庭申请保护令。 ”敢问林爱莲在凯发重组中扮演的角色?何以在重组过程中她没有将其所得收益贡献出来?“ 协会的信函也提到,在2017年凯发年报,支付给凯发关键领导层的总薪酬高达265万元。何以该集团可以在当下艰难财务环境下,仍能继续支付高额薪酬?这些公司领导理应清楚公司面对的情况,也要负上很大的责任。

年收入鸿沟67倍 部长“养廉” 基层穷忙

本地公务员下月将获得半个月年中花红,以及一次性300元奖励。月薪介于1千250至1千581元的第五级公务员,也能同时获得额外加薪20元。该部认为,这是政府持续支持低薪公务员的承诺。 不过,若进一步想,这些公务员在扣除20巴仙公积金后,真正带回家的每月收入,只有1008新元。 相比之下,我国总理的年薪达到220万新元,与初级公务员1万6250新元(1千250月薪X13个月(一个月花红))的年薪相比,足足多了135倍! 加拿大总理年薪为34万7400元,当地的垃圾工人年薪4万9400元,薪资差距也只有7倍。 在我国“高薪养廉”政策下,我国部长级人马薪资堪称全球最高,总理与基层公务员收入天壤之别,足以显见高高在上的领导人,与草根民众之间巨大的财富鸿沟。 1973年至今,部长年薪调涨34倍 若我们回顾1973年,当时的部长年薪为5万8500新元(月薪4500新元X13个月)。但是时至今日,MR4初级部长,年薪已经达到110万新元。 这意味着,初级部长工作一天的收入,就是初级公务员月薪(1千250新元)的2.4倍。至于MR1高级部长日薪,更是初级公务员月薪的3.8倍! 此外,部长还可获得1个月常年可变花红、3个月个人表现花红和3个月国家表现花红。至于总理,则获得6个月的国家表现花红。 减国债 马内阁自愿减薪10% 远的不说,且来看看邻国马来西亚:…