China’s southern Guangdong province has launched a raft of anti-discrimination policies targeting businesses and venues after a heavy-handed crackdown on the African community sparked international outrage last month.
Authorities in the provincial capital Guangzhou had started mass testing its African community shortly after a cluster of COVID-19 cases was found in a neighbourhood with a large migrant population, and a wave of reports about discrimination and xenophobia followed.
The new anti-racism rules, announced on the weekend, came after many Africans in Guangzhou said they had been forcibly evicted by police from their accommodation, refused service at shops and restaurants, and were subject to mass coronavirus testing and arbitrary quarantines.
Now, businesses and residential compounds “must implement non-discriminatory service… treat all Chinese and foreigners in Guangdong equally, and firmly oppose any racist or discriminatory speech and behaviour,” according to a Sunday report by the state-run China News Service.
The new policies appeared to address some of the concerns raised by the African community, banning public spaces from setting tighter entry requirements for certain nationalities and promising to punish buses and taxis who refuse foreign passengers.
They also ban landlords from cancelling housing contracts or increasing rent without explanation. However, the measures do not outline any specific punishments.
A total of 111 African nationals in Guangzhou have tested positive for COVID-19, including 19 imported cases, officials announced on April 11. The vast majority of imported cases in Guangdong province involved returning Chinese nationals.
McDonald’s China was among the businesses who came under fire. It apologised after a branch in Guangzhou displayed a sign banning black people from entry, prompting online outrage.
Thiam, a 25-year-old exchange student from Guinea, told AFP that he suffered discrimination in Guangzhou even after completing a 14-day home quarantine and producing a clean bill of health.
“Even when you go out and take the bus or metro, people start running away from you,” he said.
He added that when he tries booking a ride with the Didi app, “the driver will ask me if I’m black and then refuse to take me, saying black people are dangerous. It’s crazy!”
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

乐龄健保投保者 患视障却遭拒索偿

终身护保(CareShield Life)将在两年后取代现有乐龄健保(ElderShield),称之将能提供新加坡公民更多索赔和终身保障。然而乐龄健保投保者之一的张先生,向‘网络公民’分享自身经历,声明说即使出示视障医疗证明,向职总英康( NTUC Income)的索偿也不获批准。 乐龄健保是新加坡政府设立的严重伤残保险计划,为需要长期护理关怀的乐龄人士提供基本财务保障。在现有体制下,所有持有保健储蓄户口(MediSave)的新加坡公民和永久居民将在40岁开始自动参与乐龄健保,除非另行要求退保。 对于“严重伤残”,乐龄健保计划如此定义:在有/无辅助工具(如拐杖,轮椅等),个人在三项日常起居活动或以上无法自理,意为着该人士需要他人协助打理生活起居。 怎样才算 “重度残障”? 如果因为残疾而无法进行以下六项日常活动中的任何三项,投保人和看护者便可以向保险公司索赔: 沐浴:可否自行出入淋浴间、需他者协助沐浴与否 更衣:可否穿戴衣裤妥当、配置义肢、医疗辅助工具等 进食:可否喂食用膳 如厕:可否自行/在辅助工具协助下使用厕具…

13日通知客工确诊,迄今未被安排隔离! 雇主急坏脸书求助

有雇主在脸书申诉,他旗下一名客工近期确诊冠病19,然而却迟迟未被当局安排送往隔离中心,焦急万分求助无门下,只得上网把这件事情公开,希望各界帮忙想办法。 名为詹德拉(Tsjin Dolly Chandra)的雇主表示,有关客工是在6月22日接受冠病家测,但迟至7月13日早上8点半,才收到卫生部的简讯,确认这位客工确诊,并要求客工需立即通知宿舍经营者。 确诊客工主动要求隔离,宿舍报案称“没空房” 然而,詹德拉声称,宿舍经营者也反映他们也做不了什么,他也透露客工还亲自要求宿舍保安,让他独自隔离,但被告知没有空房。结果12名客工都必须继续共处一室,仅被要求戴上口罩。客工间也感到焦虑,特别是确诊者担忧把病毒传播给室友。 詹德拉曾在7月13日拨打卫生部热线反映此事,得知需24小时进行安排,转移客工到隔离中心。但不知何故过了两天,却没有动静,詹德拉昨日(15日)再致电询问,岂知却被告知“系统中没有记录”,令詹德拉感到不论是宿舍和政府机构好像都在“踢皮球”。 詹德拉强调,本不想把此事公开媒体,但现今只能希望有人能指点迷津。他也担忧这回否是客工宿舍确诊病例居高不小的导因之一。 而在另一脸书贴文,该公司的人事部成员苏淑芬就表示,人力部手机程序“FWMOMCare”,迟至周三才更新信息,告知有关客工确诊。但这名客工却是在三个礼拜前,即6月22日接受检测的。 再者,该公司从周一开始就已致电当局询问,却迟迟未见对确诊客工的安排,致使后者一直和11名工友共处一室。7月14日,有关客工告知他仍未接到来自卫生部或宿舍管理层的任何更新资讯,即使打给宿舍管理层,对方也称无能为力,要等卫生部。 她较后拨电卫生部,有职员协助记录下资料和宿舍地址,也在点天下午告知工作小组会接手;但之后仍无下文,再次打给卫生部热线,结果令人惊讶的是,对方竟称没有之前的记录。“那我之前是在跟谁说话?” 较后该公司也拨电询问工作小组,但职员却告知只有在得到医疗机构的指示下才能采取行动,令她质疑当局处理客工宿舍疫情的能力。

“若选举似乎对执政党有利” 反对党认同当前应专注抗疫

对于选区选区范围检讨委员会报告在上周(13日)公布报告,本社采访不同在野党领袖的看法。 人民党秘书长谢镜丰坦言,现阶段真的不是搞政治、赢选票的时候。反之在召开选举之前,更应该合力应对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)防堵疫情。 不过,选区范围检讨报告已出炉,且总理早前似乎释放将举行选举的信息。谢镜丰批评行动党常把危机当作可利用的机遇。而有鉴于疫情当前需要保持社交距离减少接触,这可能影响反对党造势和传达政见给选民的效果。 该党主席乔立盟则认为,现在召开选举反而对执政党有利,各政党需要注意选举局未来宣布的举措,因为这都可能影响他们进行竞选。为防疫大家都必须保持社交距离,如何传达政见都是个问题。 国人为先党党魁陈如斯则指出,在疫情危机下若召开选举,政府把自身利益摆在国人性命健康之上,是“不负责任的”。 他呼吁政府当前应全力抗疫,反对党也会和政府“同仇敌忾”。但是现在选举反而会分散国人的注意力,无法团结国人力量共同抗疫。 他认为,有鉴于政府掌控主流媒体,反对党只得依靠竞选集会传达政见,或是透过主流媒体。再者他不排除选举期间政府仍会使用《防假消息法》对付反对党,且政府有资源全天候“照看所有事件” 人民力量党秘秘书长吴明盛则重申,疫情当前大家都专注在抗疫,不适合召开选举。若举行选举,就不可避免造成群众聚集、候选人还可能会接触民众、握手等。 “我们不能危及选民。” 他不解为何选区范围检讨委会报告迟至八个月后才出炉,再者对于选区的更动委会并未多做解释。 “但很肯定选举已近,可能是一个月,也可能是半年。但肯定不会拖到一年。”吴明盛表示,反对党并未感到措手不及,只不过若现在选举,真的不是时候。 然而若总理执意闪电大选,且“诚挚地没有利用危机”,那么竞选期间应该举办每天两小时的直播辩论,让选民可以对比行动党和反对党领袖的政见。

Gold standard in dealing with COVID-19 has actually been Taiwan, not Singapore, says local netizen

Singapore’s efforts to curb the spread of the COVID-19 have drawn praise…