Historian Pingtjin Thum once again reiterated his assertion about Operation Coldstore that there was no evidence to show that those detained were involved in any communist conspiracy.

In short Facebook post on 1 December, Dr Thum pointed out that since the government is now using the Protection against Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), he wanted to make his position on the matter clear.

He wrote: “Now that Singapore’s PAP government is actively using POFMA to go after “fake news”, let me say this one last time so that there can be no uncertainty: There is no evidence that the detainees of Operation Coldstore were involved in any communist conspiracy to subvert the government of Singapore.”

In November, the government has already invoked POFMA twice in one week. The first was a correction order issued by Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat for a Facebook post written by political activist Brad Bowyer.

The second, also a correction order, was issued by Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugan for a Facebook post by States Times Review. There was also another direction issued directly to Facebook to correct the post made by States Times Review as the editor of the site, Alex Tan, refused to comply with the first order.

Dr Thum, the government and Operation Coldstore

The conversation about Operation Coldstore came to light again this year when Dr Thum appeared before a select committee in March and was questioned extensively by Law and Home Affairs ministers about his interpretation of documents from the Special Branch, the precursor to the Internal Security Department.

The minister kept asserting that Dr Thum’s interpretation was flawed, arguing that the detainees were in fact planning to mount an armed struggle against the government in the 50s and early 60s.

Later, both Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee and Senior Minister of State for Transport and Communication and Information Janil Puthucheary – who were members of the select committee – said that Dr Thum had agreed that some of his writings were misleading.

In an article published by Straits Times (10 April 2018) written by them, they also said Dr Thum admitted he had no read and sometimes not heard of writings by certain ex-leaders and cadres of the Communist Party of Malaya who were considering an armed struggle as a legitimate option.

However, Dr Thum challenged the committee’s conclusion in a submission in May, clarifying that the main point of his original submission was not addressed in the earlier six-hour discussion. He added that the committee focused on an article he cited on Operation Coldstore instead.

Dr Thum clarified that extracts from certain books presented in the hearings did not have primary sources cited and were not independently verifiable.

He added that “the best evidence” on communism in Singapore would be from the Singapore Special Branch documents, none of which were presenting during the hearing.

He also said, “at no point did I accept that any part of my article was inaccurate or misleading.”

What Dr Thum did concede was that a statement in his paper concerning a telegram from British Commissioner to Singapore Lord Selkirk during Operation Coldstore could have been worded better. The historian acknowledged that while Barisan Sosialis members called for continued peaceful constitutional action in order to achieve power in Singapore in late 1962, they did not explicitly rule out an armed struggle.

Later in his follow-up submission in May, Dr Thum said the argument that Barisan Sosialis unanimously agreed to continue following peaceful constitutional action is accurate based on notes and other documents he cited in his paper. A point he had reiterated during the hearing, said Dr Thum.

In his May submission, Dr Thum also highlighted an error in the transcript of the March hearing which showed that Mr Shanmugam kept referring to a telegram from Lord Selkirk dated 14 December 1962. In fact, Dr Thum noted that Mr Shanmugan had corrected himself and referred to a telegram, numbered 573, dated 11 December 1962 instead.

Dr Thum said, “It is important to clarify exactly which document is being referenced, because (the Dec 11, 1962 telegram) in fact shows that Lord Selkirk was more concerned with the political position of the British vis-à-vis merger and the creation of Malaysia, than with the security issue.

“In other words, his Telegram 573 supports my argument that Operation Coldstore was fundamentally motivated by political, not security, reasons.”

Mr Shanmugan had also said during the hearing that though there were no instructions for violent actions from leaders of the Communist Party of Malaya, that didn’t discount that there was no communist conspiracy at a lower of the organisation. For example, Dr Shanmugam pointed to the Hock Lee bus riots, saying that there may have been certain members of the party who instigated the incident without instructions from above.

To this, Dr Thum again referred to the Special Branch documents, noting how it states that the Hock Lee bus riots were caused by “PAP political manipulation”.
He said, “It emphasised that the PAP was using workers for political gain.”

It remains to be seen if the government will use POFMA on Dr Thum for making” flawed” and “misleading” statements about Operation Coldstore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

行动党15市镇会下月起 禁PMD在组屋底层和公共走廊使用

据了解,从下月1日起,人民行动党15个市镇理事会将禁止所有个人代步工具在组屋底层和公共走廊使用。 人民行动党市镇会协调主席张俰宾博士,在今日(7日)发文告声称,市镇会已经检讨已有条例(bylaw),一旦获得新加坡总检察署批准后,将实行新禁令。 有鉴于个人代步工具(PMD)事故频发,包括陆路交通局等各造也着手管制PMD。 在前日的国会上,交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明指出,许多国人依赖PMD出行和维持生计,但是在前两年(2017和2018年)涉及PMD的公共路径事故就多达228宗,而今年上半年也爆发了49宗涉及PMD的火患,所以采取提前措施是有必要的。 明年4月起,所有新的电动踏板车,都必须通过UL2272标准认证检查,并确保重量、宽度和车速符合规格,才能注册使用。 陆交局因电动踏板车火警事件频传,自上个月规定必须注册后,昨日宣布将强制电动个人代步工具(简称PMD)符合UL2272标准的措施提前半年实行,所有个人代步工具必须在明年7月起达到有关防火标准。 上个月起,陆交局已强制电动踏板车进行注册,惟至今已经注册的9万辆电动踏板车中,有将近九成不符合UL2272的安全标准。 相关的电动踏板车原定于2021年起就会自动注销注册,不能再公开使用了。 他指出,当局将UL2272期限提前半年,主要认为这是最早能做到的合理期限,也让零售商有更多时间引进拥有UL2272防火标准认证的足够货源。

“非法停船影响航行” 马船只撞船事故再掀新马领海争议

两船相撞无伤亡或漏油事件发生,却掀起了新加坡和马来西亚的海域争议,我国政府指马船只非法停泊影响航行安全,要求马方需撤离非法停泊在新加坡海域的船只,并为此事故负责。 根据报告,本月九日下午2时28分,马来西亚的北极星号(Polaris)浮标船及希腊的比雷埃夫斯(Piraeus)散货船相撞。 两国坚持在自家水域发生 针对有关事故的事发地点,新马双方都表示事故是发生在各自的海域内,新加坡海事及港务管理局(MPA)表示事故在大士港(Tuas)岸外水域发生,超越马来西亚于1979年主张、新加坡也从未承认过的领土主权;而马来西亚海事局(MARDEP)总监指出有关事发地点实在新山港口的界线之内,并没有影响到新加坡的航行问题。 我国外交部发言人重申,马国船只持续停泊在有关水域将会影响航行安全,应撤离大士海域。我国也早前已表明,马国继续派遣船只到有关水域,就得为任何意外事故负责。 新加坡海事及港务管理局正在调查这起事故。 当时希腊的比雷埃夫斯散货船正准备从新加坡开往马来西亚丹绒帕拉帕斯(Tanjung Pelepas)港口,却在途中与马来西亚的北极星号浮标船相撞。 马国扣留希腊船只调查 马国外交部于10日发出文告说,希腊的比雷埃夫斯散货船,是在当天下午2时15分驶入马来西亚的柔佛新山港口海域。 两船事前进行沟通后决定由比雷埃夫斯散货船“让道”给北极星号,但还是发生了碰撞,较后在2时36分才完全分开。 相关文告也指出,马国海事局依据《1952年大马商务海运法令》第334(1)条文,已经扣留了比雷埃夫斯散货船及其船员,以进行初步调查。…

SPH: We welcome Govt’s draft legislation to deal with online “fake news”

In a statement published by the Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) today (4…

老人家行动不便 善心人为他戴上口罩

看到没戴口罩的老人家在路旁,行动缓慢地前进着,善心人士调转车头送上了口罩,还帮忙修复他的拐杖,之后才发现,原来老人家不是不要戴口罩,而是行动不方便,所以戴不上口罩。 网友“让希望活下去”创办人潘迎芬在脸书分享,指她日前在上班路上,看见一名行动缓慢且没戴口罩的老阿伯。她当时就过了两个交通灯后U转,发现了只走10步路的老人家,就让同车友人送上了口罩。 “然后我们开始寻找他的拐杖……慌忙地将车子停在路旁,使用脚踏车铃和LED灯的塑胶塞来固定好他的拐杖。” 当他们做好这些时,只见老人家手还拿着口罩,被没有戴上,也一度怀疑老人家是不是不愿戴口罩。 然而他们细查之后,发现老人家的右手和手臂无法移动,而左手拿着拐杖,根本无法自己戴口罩。“这让我们感到羞愧。” 虽然他们帮助老人家戴上口罩后,想要送老人家一程,但是基于工作时间将至,他们唯有开车离去。“他可能要花半个小时才能回到家。希望天空不要下雨。若下雨了,给他一把伞,他也无法使用。” 在贴文的尾端,潘迎芬认为我们要善用良知良能,不要认为没戴口罩的老人家一定是固执的。“他们可能有其他原因,我们要先开口问,然后再自我衡量,看看是否能够帮助到他们。” 有关帖文瞬间获得大批网民关注,不少网民也对潘迎芬的暖心举止按赞。眼尖的网民们也提醒,戴口罩时,蓝色的部分要向外面哦。