Just recently, six MPs from the People’s Action Party (PAP) Women’s Wing released a position paper which revealed that 58% of respondents in a survey said that the cost of raising children is a main concern when deciding to have another child.
The paper outlines several financial issues that parents had cited from very high pre-school fees to the high cost of treatment for children with disabilities, which have become impediments to parenthood for many Singaporeans.
According to a poll, families with a combined household income of S$12,000 can spend between 6%-15% of their income on pre-school related out-of-pocket expenses such as school trips and graduation concerns. On top of that, 70.6% of respondents say they’ve used their Baby Bonus cash gift to pay for pre-school fees while many have also depleted their Child Development account funds for the same reason.
“Even with the subsidies that we see currently, many parents are still paying very high out-of-pocket expenses for pre-school,” said Ms Sun Xueling, who led a team of five other MPs in this survey and position paper.
Curiously, this is contrary to the stance taken by PAP MP of Ang Mo Kio Darryl David who had said earlier this year that rising costs are not a factor that Singaporeans consider when deciding to raise children. The member of the supervisory panel of the government’s official feedback arm REACH said on a Money FM podcast in January before the budget announcement, “I’ve never had someone tell me ever that they are not having children because it’s too expensive. Seriously, they’ve never said that.”
While he conceded that there are “significant expenses” with raising a child, he doesn’t agree that “it’s not cheap” to do so. He added, “I have had, to be honest, parents tell me that ‘well I’ve got one kid now’, and they say ‘I’m thinking of having a second kid now but I’m not quite sure lah, because so expensive you know’…when they talk to me they say ‘actually it’s not that I don’t want or I can’t afford to have a second or even a third child, but I’m choosing to have one child because I want to give a lot to that child’”.
Clearly the position paper by the PAP Women’s Wing MPs debunks Mr David’s statements that costs of childcare not the reason why Singaporeans are not having more children.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】网民讥“全是一类” 陈振声吁莫给行动党新人贴标签

人民行动党最近刚介绍了27名准候选人。不过,有网民嘲讽,这些准候选人看起来好像都来自“同一类”,不是出身军伍、不然就是公务员、医生或律师等等,和原行动党议员似乎都来自同一群体。 对此行动党第二助理秘书长、贸工部长陈振声则表示,民众不必依据新人的职业,就为他们归类“贴标签”(英语原意pigeonhole),再者应考量该党整体93名准候选人,实则都来自不同领域。 他指出,有者出身商界、社会领域、公共服务领域等,“所以我们可以说涵盖了各界。” 他说,人们应该避免根据这些新人的职业,来武断地标签他们。陈振声称,与其因为他们来自特定背景,就为他们贴标签,他认为实则新人们都有各自的个性值得人们去了解。 当被询及行动党缺乏印裔候选人,陈振声则表示,该党有九名印裔准候选人,其中六人还是政治职务者。

震惊女童失踪四年无人知晓 学者吁保护儿童人人有责

发生在振瑞路(Chin Swee Road)的铁锅烧尸案件于周二(17日)聆审,揭发了遭烧毁的尸体原来是于2014年被杀害的两岁半女童,令人感到毛骨悚然下,不禁好奇到,为何孩子失踪四年了却无人知晓。 南洋理工大学的LIEW KAI KHIUN教授指出,他对此案的发生感到震惊和伤心,更感到非常不安,因为孩子五年来的失踪,既然没有任何机构发现。 他致函新闻传媒网站《今日报》(Today)表示,他认为其实社会大众,无论任何机构或人员,保护儿童人人有责。 他表示,或者有人会认为在事件发生前,女童的失踪应该提早被人发现,如当涉案夫妇在涉及滥用毒品和其他犯罪活动时,被警察或中央肃毒局(CNB)采取对付行动时;或是在卫生部发觉相关儿童没有准时接受疫苗注射时;或是教育部依据《义务教育法案》,察觉儿童并没有在制定年龄内接受教育时。 “尽管社区、自愿组织或亲友邻里,可以实地监督观察,但他们可能也未被组织起来,或拥有对孩童福利进行监测的知识和资源。” 他表示,虽然了解案件还在调查中,“但是遗憾的是,这小孩已经成为我们系统缝隙的牺牲者了”。 他认为不能将此案归咎到社会及家庭发展部的职权范围内,但是显示了在处理脆弱的家庭和儿童课题上,加强其他政府部门机构之间的程序和协调是迫切需要的。 “为孩子伸张正义,不仅仅是惩罚肇事者。”…

MOM: 7 workplaces ordered to close, 52 employers fined for failing to comply with safe management measures

Two weeks since the circuit breaker ended on 2 June, the Ministry…