Just recently, six MPs from the People’s Action Party (PAP) Women’s Wing released a position paper which revealed that 58% of respondents in a survey said that the cost of raising children is a main concern when deciding to have another child.
The paper outlines several financial issues that parents had cited from very high pre-school fees to the high cost of treatment for children with disabilities, which have become impediments to parenthood for many Singaporeans.
According to a poll, families with a combined household income of S$12,000 can spend between 6%-15% of their income on pre-school related out-of-pocket expenses such as school trips and graduation concerns. On top of that, 70.6% of respondents say they’ve used their Baby Bonus cash gift to pay for pre-school fees while many have also depleted their Child Development account funds for the same reason.
“Even with the subsidies that we see currently, many parents are still paying very high out-of-pocket expenses for pre-school,” said Ms Sun Xueling, who led a team of five other MPs in this survey and position paper.
Curiously, this is contrary to the stance taken by PAP MP of Ang Mo Kio Darryl David who had said earlier this year that rising costs are not a factor that Singaporeans consider when deciding to raise children. The member of the supervisory panel of the government’s official feedback arm REACH said on a Money FM podcast in January before the budget announcement, “I’ve never had someone tell me ever that they are not having children because it’s too expensive. Seriously, they’ve never said that.”
While he conceded that there are “significant expenses” with raising a child, he doesn’t agree that “it’s not cheap” to do so. He added, “I have had, to be honest, parents tell me that ‘well I’ve got one kid now’, and they say ‘I’m thinking of having a second kid now but I’m not quite sure lah, because so expensive you know’…when they talk to me they say ‘actually it’s not that I don’t want or I can’t afford to have a second or even a third child, but I’m choosing to have one child because I want to give a lot to that child’”.
Clearly the position paper by the PAP Women’s Wing MPs debunks Mr David’s statements that costs of childcare not the reason why Singaporeans are not having more children.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Core inflation forecast dropped to 0.8% due to overall lower prices, says MAS and MTI

MAS Core Inflation eased to 0.8% on a year on year basis…

One man's prioritisation is another's discrimination

~ By Tan Kin Lian ~ I read about the priority scheme…

新大生偷拍女同事如厕仅判14天短期居留 控方要求增刑却被驳回

新大生在实习期间偷拍女同事如厕的画面,日前被判14天短期拘留令,然而控方认为刑罚应再加重,向法庭上诉却被驳回,法官指在改造和惩罚之间应该取得平衡。 根据案情所述,被告云齐桐(音译,Hoon Qi Tong)为25岁新加坡管理大学学生,目前于中央商业区一家公司实习,已毕业。 案情显示,被告于2017年8月开始实习,并出现偷拍女同事裙底的习惯,随后他对裙底视频不感兴趣,于是转向偷拍女同事如厕。 被告于2017年9月13日帮网跟踪一名女同事到女厕外,并躲进隔间,站在马桶上,用手机从上拍女同事如厕画面,即被女同事发现,并要求交出手机给对方检查和删掉视频。 随后被告认罪,被判14天短期拘留令与130个小时的社区服务,对此,控方认为短期拘留令的目的在于改造因素大于惩罚因素,是为了低风险的罪犯所施予的惩罚,以让被告不受监禁的污名。 不过鉴于被告的情况,在犯下罪行时已年届23岁的成年人,明显上述刑罚不足,因此刑罚应居于阻吓和惩罚为基础。 控方也指出,被告告诉精神科医生,他即希望偷拍时被抓,借此摆脱性癖好,但在女同事发现后又出现求饶的行为,其口供可信度不足,因此质疑他受到刑罚的成效,要求法官判被告坐牢至少八周。 高庭法官则指出,要同时顾及社会利益与惩罚的尺度实属不易,因此国家法院法官判处被告短期拘留令,是在改造与惩罚间取得平衡,故此认为是正确的刑罚,驳回上诉。

张媛容质疑冠毒死亡病例数据 网民引述世卫指南解惑

在野政治人物张媛容律师指出,在我国过世的四名年轻冠状病毒患者,他们的死亡病例并没有记录在冠毒纪录内,因此她质疑有关的可信度,然而有网民引述世界卫生组织的说法,推翻有关的疑惑。 张媛容今天在脸书上帖文指出,在我国死亡的三名印度籍和一名马来西亚客工,年龄介于32岁至46岁,都对冠毒检测呈现阳性反应,但是他们四人并未列入我国14起死亡病例之中。 这四名死者分别被记录为: 46岁的印度籍客工于2020年4月23日,在邱德拔医院的楼梯处被发现时,已经一动不动,死于伤亡。 37岁的印度籍客工于2020年4月22日,死于肺血栓栓塞症,即肺动脉阻塞。 40岁的马来西亚客工于2020年4月18日逝世,也是确诊病例第4754起。然而据卫生部指出,他是死于心脏病发作,而非冠状病毒所引发的并发症。 32岁的印度籍的长期通行证持有者,于2020年4月8日逝世,也是确诊病例第1604起。卫生部指他是死于缺血性心脏病,而非冠毒所引起的并发症。死者当时正在等待冠毒检测报告,而在他死亡后被证实确诊。 张媛容指出,除了其中一人被指伤亡之外,其他三人的死因都是心脏病及动脉阻塞,而曾有报道指出,冠状病毒或可能引起心脏病及血块。因此她问道,“我们可以确定说这四人的死亡,均与冠状病毒无关吗?” 有关帖文引起网民关注,然而署名Shoop Oei的网民在评论区就回应了有关疑惑。 他引述了世卫组织在区分冠毒死亡病例指南时指出,“根据世卫组织的说法,即使冠毒可能影响或导致死亡的发生,但是事故和心肌梗塞不应该归类为冠毒死亡病例”。