Just recently, six MPs from the People’s Action Party (PAP) Women’s Wing released a position paper which revealed that 58% of respondents in a survey said that the cost of raising children is a main concern when deciding to have another child.
The paper outlines several financial issues that parents had cited from very high pre-school fees to the high cost of treatment for children with disabilities, which have become impediments to parenthood for many Singaporeans.
According to a poll, families with a combined household income of S$12,000 can spend between 6%-15% of their income on pre-school related out-of-pocket expenses such as school trips and graduation concerns. On top of that, 70.6% of respondents say they’ve used their Baby Bonus cash gift to pay for pre-school fees while many have also depleted their Child Development account funds for the same reason.
“Even with the subsidies that we see currently, many parents are still paying very high out-of-pocket expenses for pre-school,” said Ms Sun Xueling, who led a team of five other MPs in this survey and position paper.
Curiously, this is contrary to the stance taken by PAP MP of Ang Mo Kio Darryl David who had said earlier this year that rising costs are not a factor that Singaporeans consider when deciding to raise children. The member of the supervisory panel of the government’s official feedback arm REACH said on a Money FM podcast in January before the budget announcement, “I’ve never had someone tell me ever that they are not having children because it’s too expensive. Seriously, they’ve never said that.”
While he conceded that there are “significant expenses” with raising a child, he doesn’t agree that “it’s not cheap” to do so. He added, “I have had, to be honest, parents tell me that ‘well I’ve got one kid now’, and they say ‘I’m thinking of having a second kid now but I’m not quite sure lah, because so expensive you know’…when they talk to me they say ‘actually it’s not that I don’t want or I can’t afford to have a second or even a third child, but I’m choosing to have one child because I want to give a lot to that child’”.
Clearly the position paper by the PAP Women’s Wing MPs debunks Mr David’s statements that costs of childcare not the reason why Singaporeans are not having more children.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

There was no agreement between Reform Party and Progress Singapore Party regarding Yio Chu Kang SMC, says PSP’s Leong Mun Wai

There is no agreement between the Reform Party (RP) and the Progress…

17-year-old boy fined $100 by LTA for underpayment of bus fare

Earlier this month, a post about a boy who was fined $100…

曾放眼1991年劳动力清一色新加坡人 李光耀的愿景怎么了?

翻译自:Foong Swee Fong脸书 1982年的新年献词,已故建国总理李光耀提到,须在1991年达到劳动力完全由新加坡人组成。当时他认为,依靠大量移工在社会、政治和经济层面都不可取。他以法国、英国和当时的西德为例,大量移工劳动力也延伸很大的社会问题。 此外,他也指日本国民对所有肮脏、繁重的工作亲力亲为,劳工的生产力更高,鲜有社会问题和骚乱。 在有关新年献词,他提及隔年过期工作准证不获更新,非传统工作准证持有者在1984年12月31日将离开,惟建筑业和船厂工作者,则放眼1991年全由国人担任。他也敦促企业必须提升、自动化、电脑化,更有效地使用和分配员工。 而在早几年的70年代,时任财政部长韩瑞生也曾指出,不希望仰仗大量外籍劳动力,国人还得靠自己。 然而尽管开国先贤对外籍劳动力有所保留,然而时至今日我们仍为此所困扰,究竟怎么了? 在李光耀作出大胆声明的1982年,几年后新加坡陷入首次严重衰退。在之前的20年迅猛增长后,1985年的经济增长萎缩至负位数。 这是因为包括劳动力成本高、前几年房产供过于求、以及西方经济衰退等数种因素影响。 新加坡成立了经济检讨委员会,时任贸工部长李显龙主持,他通过削减劳动成本、削减高收入者公司的公司税和个人所得税;减免雇主对公积金的给付、放松管制。同时,除了国防和公用事业,私有化许多政府部门(显然受到英美新自由主义的影响)。 结果,新加坡航空、星展集团、新加坡电信、SMRT、凯德、吉宝集团、胜科等相续成立,以及现今已茁壮成长成庞然大物的淡马锡控股。…

An Open Letter to Minister of Transport Raymond Lim

Dear Mr Raymond Lim, I would like to kindly bring your attention…