Letters allegedly thrown away by SingPost postman. Postman has since been sacked and a police report has been filed against the ex-staff by SingPost.

Just two weeks ago Singapore Post (SingPost) apologised for its “service failures” over the year-end peak season, but the postal company is back in the limelight once again for negative publicity after undelivered mails were found in a dustbin at Ang Mo Kio.

Facebook user Alyce Kathlyn posted eight photos on Monday night (28 January), showing unopened letters from the government agencies like the Land Transport Authority, the National University of Singapore and the Ministry of Health’s Community Health Assist Scheme, all discarded in public dustbins.

The letters were addressed to some residents living in Ang Mo Kio Avenue 4 and 5.

Ms Kathlyn claimed that the postman had discarded the letters and parcels in the bin.

“This is not the first time we’ve found this in Ang Mo Kio,” she wrote in the Facebook post, which has garnered more than 170 comments and 7,000 shares.

As the post quickly went viral, SingPost sent a team to Ang Mo Kio on the same night to comb the area for the undelivered letters, but to no avail.

“The bin was located and the team expanded its search to every bin within the vicinity, with no success of locating the letters. Letter boxes were also opened to check if these letters had been delivered to affected recipients,” explained SingPost.

Since the letters were not found, SingPost’s customer service team tried getting in touch with Ms Kathlyn but did not receive a reply as it was late in the night.

The postman on duty is also being questioned, added SingPost.

On Tuesday morning (29 January), Ms Kathlyn responded to SingPost’s query and stated that the letters had been found at a dustbin in Blk 179 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 5 and was placed at the nearest letterbox for residents to collect them.

She added that SingPost should have contacted her personally, instead of reaching out to her via her Facebook photo thread.

Shortly after Ms Kathlyn’s latest post, SingPost said it will be retrieving the letters immediately.

In December 2018, someone took to social media to point out how the how the delivery man didn’t bother waiting for him to answer the door before walking away. This post was followed by a deluge of complaints from other customers who had experienced similar issues of postal officers not even attempting to deliver a parcel but just leaving a note to say that the delivery attempt was unsuccessful.

After this news went viral, many netizens are furious at this incident and wondered how many times SingPost will apologise for their shortcomings.

To curb this issue, Rey Ong suggested that the government should open up postal service to more competitors and tender model. This is because SingPost is being the monopoly in the industry so the problems will keep coming as they don’t have much competitions.

On the other hand, Ling Ling Ling suggested that SingPost should engage part-timers during the festive season. However, they should allocate a leader cum driver who will drive them to the specific location and offload the letters to the said zone in a bath.

 

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

砂商家获准证卖鞭炮 仅限十五种

在新加坡,政府自70年代就制定《危险烟火法》,严禁民众使用和拥有烟火,民间团体若要燃放,也许获得政府核实安全标准是否合格才能批准。 不过在马来西亚砂拉越,当地有商家获得准证,在佳节期间公开贩售鞭炮。 根据马国《星洲日报》采访古晋警区主任,证实该警区约发出了十余张售卖鞭炮烟花的执照,不过仅限佳节期间如农历新年、开斋节、达雅节和圣诞节时使用。 这些执照有期限,执照有效期至元宵节,且只限出售十五种鞭炮,包括传统顺利红炮和烟花。商家要向内政部批准的代理公司申请,待对方批准后,商家再向警方申请执照。 不代表民间能公开购买 不过,马国总警长弗兹在受媒体询问时又表示“毫不知情”,又强调不是所有鞭炮都可以合法售卖,即使持有准证也不例外。 不过,也有当地律师认为,即便商家有合法准证卖烟火,不代表民众可以公然购买。许多社团组织举行庆典,其实都是在无准证情况下燃放,实际上警方也是“睁一只眼闭一只眼”。他劝民众还是不买鞭炮为妙,以免惹麻烦。 就在去年,吉隆坡一家得易购(TESCO)商场公开售卖鞭炮,虽然声称获得警方批准许可,不过最后仍受警方取缔。理由是马国可公开贩售的烟花,仅限“POP-POP”和“HAPPY BOOM”两种,但要贩卖仍需向地方警区申请准证。 在马国,1996年就已出台《鞭炮与烟花禁令》,燃放鞭炮罚款100令吉或监禁不超过一个月,生产“爆炸物”就罚款2000令吉,收藏“爆炸物”就罚款700令吉,拥有“爆炸物”罚款300令吉。

Heng says look to Swiss for lessons in worker welfare but ignores Swiss tight FT policy

It was reported in the media today (‘Look to Swiss for lessons…

“美丽求求你”讽刺视频引发网友激烈讨论

近日闹得沸沸扬扬的网红“美丽求求你”拍摄讽刺视频,亦引起许多争议。内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根日前批评网红的行为“已过界“,认为该说唱视频有意侮辱新加坡华人,试图挑拨少数民族对华人产生愤怒。 美丽求求你的说唱视频长达2分50秒,于周一(29日)上传至社交网络平台上,其歌词内容相信是针对日前充满争议的epay的宣传照而讽刺,但同日下午就已撤下,在撤下前获得1100个赞和110则留言。 视频内普丽蒂批评新传媒拍摄的广告传递刻板印象,艺人打扮成印度人不好笑也看起来很傻,至少可以选用不同的人拍广告;至于她的哥哥苏巴什则揶揄“干嘛要妒忌他的肤色”,而怎么选谁都是华人赢;再者上一次屠妖节还有华人打扮成锡克族,令他感到受不了。 视频中两人也有作出比中指手势和粗口。不过在片尾普丽蒂声明,并不是针对指所有华人都是种族歧视的。 该视频是调侃早前新加坡华裔艺人周崇庆,为电子付费平台epay拍摄的宣传照片。周崇庆在广告中一人分饰四角,包括印度人和穆斯林妇女。有关宣传照被指制造刻板种族形象,欠缺敏感度。 对此,资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)发表文告表示,经判定后,认为该视频内容含禁止内容,基于公众利益与社会和谐,已指示发布者将其撤下。目前该视频已从各大社交网络平台撤下,包含原视频与重新上传的视频。 另一方面,针对具争议性的广告,新传媒亦撤下广告并致歉,epaysg也同时撤下。尚穆根承认尽管广告新传媒拍摄的广告“低俗”,惟网红的视频“已过界”,让警方要介入调查。   不过,有部分网民认为政府有“双重标准”的嫌疑。针对新传媒的争议广告,只需要致歉,然而对网红兄妹的惩罚反而“严正以待”,甚至出动警方调查。   网友Adam Mikhail…