Maxwell food centre, near china town from Shutterstock.com

Following the announcement by the National Environment Agency (NEA) last Friday (16 Nov) regarding its plans to begin subsidising centralised dishwashing costs at seven new social enterprise hawker centres (SEHCs) as a part of its extension of the ‘Productive Hawker Centres’ grant to stallholders starting 1 Jan next year, netizens have strongly criticised the agency’s move.

Many netizens pointed out that the subsidies will originate from taxpayers’ money, as the NEA is a government agency, and that such subsidies will only serve to enrich the cleaning companies being contracted by the SEHC operators, adding that the provisions of centralised dishwashing services among others should be handled by the SEHC operators.

In its press release on Friday, NEA rationalised its move as a means of increasing its “support” towards stallholders in terms of “managing the cost from the adoption of centralised dishwashing service” at the seven new SEHCs, which are:

  • Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre;
  • Kampung Admiralty Hawker Centre;
  • Bukit Panjang Hawker Centre;
  • Ci Yuan Hawker Centre;
  • Yishun Park Hawker Centre;
  • Jurong West Hawker Centre; and
  • Our Tampines Hub Hawker Centre.

The agency added that it will subsidise 50% of the dishwashing costs for the first year, and then 30% for the second year. Stallholders are expected to bear the dishwashing costs in full the third year onwards.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC editor charged for criminal defamation by the Attorney General’s Chamber

TOC Editor Terry Xu has been charged for criminal defamation by the…

人权律师挑战黄循财 辩论公共住宅本质

撰文:人权律师M Ravi(北雁翻译) 我发现政府还在宣扬,公共组屋住户就是拥有者的说法,就像拥有99年租赁权的私有公寓屋主一样,可以出售他们的租约。想请问国家发展部长黄循财,能否说清楚建屋发展局公共组屋和99年私有租赁,两者的法律含义比较? 较受全球认可的法律立场认为,公共住宅住户即使无法偿还政府或私人银行贷款,也不能扣押或拉回其住所。但为何新加坡政府可以这么做呢? 根据新加坡扣押法(Distress Act),阐明若您是向政府租赁产业,例如租组屋,政府就不能申请扣押庭令(Writ of Distress)来充公您家中或您租户的财产,或者拿来拍卖、以销售收益填补租金。 事实上,我曾在高庭援引上述法规,挑战某官联公司充公我客户价值20万元印刷器材的做法,我客户最终也成功索回这些资产。这是在官联公司推出商业租赁的情境下。 那我为何提起此事?我i知道有新加坡人失去了他们的家园和组屋,但遗憾的是很多律师不愿提起,因为他们为相关提供贷款的银行工作。 既然黄循财强调公共组屋买家不是租户,认为这“不符事实和法理”,那黄部长是否愿意针对此事进行友善的辩论– 特别是假设某人无力偿还贷款,他们的公共组屋是否会被收回?…

莱佛士之家幼园发通告 二孩童母亲确诊感染武汉冠病

三一基督徒中心周三发文告指出,巴耶利峇莱佛士之家幼儿园(Raffles House Preschool)两名孩子的母亲,已经被确诊感染上武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)。 在网上流传的通告指出,有关的三一基督徒中心成员已经获得新加坡卫生局确认,是一名确诊病患。 该中心指出,病患于2月12日最后一次出现在莱佛士之家幼儿园,当时她并未出现任何疫情症状。 三一基督徒中心主任牧師楊德文指出,两个孩子于2月17日到幼儿园上学时,状况良好,目前和家人一起被勒令进行14天的居家隔离中,并没有参与基督徒中心的活动。 据《新加坡雅虎》报导指出,周三早上在莱佛士之家幼儿园传出一个消息,指确诊母亲曾经在2月12日下午抵达幼儿园的接待处移交物件,并于下午4时左右离开学校。 通告写道,“2月17日,两名孩子在幼儿园和家中的状况都良好。我们和家人保持密切联系,并且关注两名孩子的健康状况”。 幼儿园等活动持续运作 据悉,有关的幼儿园仍然继续运作,并且每天为儿童和教职员进行三次体温检测。 幼儿园管理层也在信息中鼓励学生,若身体有不适就应该在家中休养,而他们会向父母跟新消息。“我们想所有父母保证,会继续采取措施,以保障所有学童和教职员的健康。我们期许获得你们的支持,祝愿受影响的家庭尽早康复,我们也会在这段时间提供所需的支持和指导。” 在通告传出当天,幼儿园和其公共范围都展开了彻底的清洁和消毒行动。…