Source: Shutterstock

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) has fined Grab and Uber S$13 million for their anti-competitive merger under the Section 54 of the Competition Act.

After a 3-month investigations into the merger of Grab and Uber where Uber sold it’s Southeast Asian business to Grab for a 27.5% stake in Grab in return, CCCS has found that the merger these two ride-hailing platforms is in fact an anti-competitive merger. According to their investigations, CCCS believes that Uber would not have left the Singapore market if the merger had not happened. As a result, the merger has removed Grab’s closest competitor in ride-hailing platforms on the island.

In a press release, CCCS also noted that it has received numerous complaints from both riders and drivers on the increase in fares after the merger. For example, Grab announced changes to the GrabReward scheme which reduced number of points earned by riders per rolled and increased number of points required for redemption.

The investigations also concluded that Grab now holds 80% of the market share, making it extremely difficult for potential competitors to enter the market effectively, scale or expand. What makes this particularly difficult, CCCS says, is the exclusivity obligation that Grab has imposed on taxi companies, car rental partners and some of its drivers which hampers the ability of potential competitors expand their business.

As stated in the press release, “CCCS has found that the Transaction is anti-competitive, having been carried into effect, and has infringed section 54 of the Competition Act by substantially lessening competition in the ride-hailing platform market in Singapore.”

Mr. Toh Han Li, Chief Executive of CCCS said, “Mergers that substantially lessen competition are prohibited and CCCS has taken action against the Grab-Uber merger because it removed Grab’s closest rival, to the detriment of Singapore drivers and riders. Companies can continue to innovate in this market, through means other than anti-competitive mergers.”

Apart from the S$13 million financial penalties, CCCS has proposed several remedies to lessen the impact of the merger and open up the market for new players. These include ensuring that Grab drivers are free to used any ride-hailing platforms, removing Grab’s exclusivity arrangements with any taxi fleet in Singapore, maintaining Grab’s pre-merger pricing algorithm and driver commissions rates, and requiring Uber to sell their vehicles of Lion City Rentals to potential competitors who makes a reasonable offer. That last measure is to prevent Uber from selling the vehicles to Grab without CCCS’s prior approval.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lawyers puzzled why AG didn’t want to prosecute NUS peeping tom

In a media report yesterday (22 Apr), several lawyers interviewed were puzzled…

Resorts World Sentosa retrenches staff amid impact from COVID-19 pandemic

Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) will lay off its employees as part of…

All light bulbs sold in Singapore to be minimally of LED efficiency level from 2023

The National Environment Agency (NEA) announced in a press release on Friday…

议员杰乐无视生活成本高 成为家庭多生育阻力

宏茂桥集选区议员杰乐(Darryl David)最近上MONEY FM 89.3电台,在访谈中表示从未接到有民间夫妇向他申诉,生活成本高成为家庭拥有孩子的阻力。 民情联系组(REACH)和财政部,为收集民间意见,而与MONEY FM推出有关预算案主题的空中访谈节目,讨论照顾弱势群体、青年家庭和辅助企业等课题。 在主持人询及对预算案的期待,杰乐表示希望来临的预算案能为青年家庭和儿童给予多谢辅助。 “养育孩子的成本不低,有一定的开销。我有两个孩子,算是个人经验之谈。但从未有任何人告诉我,就因为生活成本太高而不想要生孩子,他们不曾这么说。” “家长希望专注在独生儿” “也听过有些家长会说,已经有一孩子,但不太肯定要不要再生多一个,(开销)太贵了,”杰乐补充,他和这些家长深入了解后,他们不全然是因为负担不起而无法多生,而是他们希望把最好的资源专注在唯一的孩子身上。 杰乐指出,如果同时有三个孩子,都去每月学费两千元的育儿中心肯定吃不消;但与此同时政府仍有提供可负担的选择,所以是否多生儿女,仍是有关家庭的取舍抉择问题。 他仍希望政府多为新生家庭提供辅助,减轻他们养育儿女的负担。…