Commentaries
Is the Workers’ Party still correctly feeling the pulse of the people?
In 2011, the Workers’ Party spectacularly captured a Group Representation Constituency, ousting a People’s Action Party team helmed by two ministers and a senior minister of state. But four years later, it only won by a whisker against the weakest GRC team ever fielded by the PAP.
Currently, the WP also has a court case hanging over its head like the Sword of Damocles.
Not that long ago, the WP was thought of as a party that could give the PAP a run for its money. But alas, it has not happened. It is not far off the mark to say that the WP has in fact been taking one step forward and one step back, sometimes even two steps back.
So what we are to make of the latest pronouncements by WP leader Pritam Singh, in response to criticism of his tacit support of the report by the Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods, mud-slingling historian Thum Ping Tjin. Pritam is of course among the 10 members of the select committee.
Pritam says that Singaporeans are “very discerning in the type of opposition they seek.” He adds: “In my view, it is not wise to pursue any approach that does not establish firmer foundations for a permanent and institutionalised opposition in Singapore.”
Is he right or misguided on both counts?
It is true that Singaporeans do not want an opposition that shoots from the hip. But neither do Singaporeans want an opposition that only comes out guns blazing every four years.
Has the WP become too static as a party? It would seem that it is resolutely sticking to its stance of working the ground. It has not actively engaged Singaporeans and the ruling party on so many national issues.
In what way has the WP evolved? A political party which simply prides itself on being moderate, which fails to push or even test boundaries, cannot hope to take significant strides forward.
It is hard to see how Pritam can make out a case for how his party has helped to establish “firmer foundations for a permanent and institutionalised opposition in Singapore.”
The fact that the WP almost lost Aljunied GRC to a feeble PAP team in 2015 speaks volumes.
It must be acknowledged that the town council saga probably had something to with it. To be fair to the WP, it was derailed by the ruling party, which, in a one-party system, has the ways and means to make life difficult for the opposition. But some of the wounds were also self-inflicted by the WP. And the town council woes and impending court case could yet put the WP to the sword.
Meanwhile, Pritam and his WP colleagues would do well to evaluate whether they have sufficiently evolved to provide the kind of opposition Singaporeans seek. Are they still correctly feeling the pulse of the people?
By playing it safe and being risk averse, the WP has ironically ended up back pedalling. It has everything to lose by keeping to the same strategy. And Singaporeans would be even bigger losers when their bastion of hope gets vanquished.
-
Singapore7 days ago
Purported resignation message from Li Hongyi as Singpass director goes viral; GovTech yet to confirm authenticity
-
Community5 days ago
PAP MP Edward Chia: ‘Sanctions on Israel do not work’ when confronted by Holland-Bukit Timah resident
-
Singapore7 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang alleges rising repression and corruption in Singapore; government calls claims a ‘personal vendetta
-
Comments2 weeks ago
8World News anchor Zhang Haijie faces criticism for labelling Lee Hsien Yang as ‘unfilial son’
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Singapore govt accuses Lee Hsien Yang of creating ‘false urgency’ over 38 Oxley Road demolition
-
Opinion1 week ago
Where does Lee Hsien Loong stand on the future of 38 Oxley Road as the government revisits the issue?
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Where is the iron in Lawrence Wong? Hiding from direct response to Lee Hsien Yang?
-
Politics1 week ago
Charles Yeo claims Singapore is seeking his extradition from UK; AGC remains silent