In a media report yesterday (22 Apr), several lawyers interviewed were puzzled why the recent peeping tom caught at National University of Singapore was not prosecuted by the Attorney-General.

For the background, Ms Monica Baey, who is an undergraduate student from the National University of Singapore (NUS) took to her Instagram account on 18 April to call out the school for trying to protect the man who had filmed her in the shower.

According to her, Ms Baey had been filmed in the shower by a male student, Nicholas Lim, back in Nov 2018. She made a police report immediately following the incident and the perpetrator was identified, along with CCTV and video evidence of him committing the act.

Unfortunately, following an investigation, the man in question was said to be only slapped with a 12-month conditional warning. She added that he will only be punished if he re-offends in the next 12 months.

Ms Baey furiously pointed out that this isn’t the first incident of its kind to happen at NUS, noting that many other women have fallen victim to being filmed in the shower.

When Ms Baey tried to appeal for a heavier sentence with the police, she was told by the investigation officer that that we should have to ‘just accept the outcome’. She added that the officer then said, “If you want real consequences or more action to be taken, go to NUS and push for action”.

Ms Baey said she did approached NUS to push for a stronger punishment from the school but the only thing they did was to forward her a letter of apology from the perpetrator.

Uncommon for first-time offender to be let off with just a warning

Criminal lawyers said the decision to give the young man who filmed a female undergraduate in the shower a conditional warning appears unusual, given that perpetrators in previous cases had been charged by the Attorney-General. A conditional warning will not show up on a person’s records. They noted that it is uncommon for even a first-time offender to be let off with just a warning for a sexual voyeurism offence.

Mr Josephus Tan from Invictus Law Corporation, said, “A first-time offender for Section 509 Penal Code offence should generally be looking at a sentence of two to four weeks in jail per charge. This NUS case seems unusual as he was let off with a conditional stern warning without going through the judicial process at the first instance.”

“Regardless of the sentence to be imposed, it would be appropriate for the offender in this case to be dealt with by our courts and a conditional stern warning could then be contemplated by the prosecution thereafter based on mitigating factors,” Mr Tan added. “A conditional stern warning is seen as a slap on the wrist in our criminal justice system.”

Ms Diana Ngiam, associate director of Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC, noted that in recent times, even first-time offenders are usually charged for similar acts of filming upskirt videos.

Lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam said, “They (AGC) do not have to provide an explanation for their decision. Unlike other jurisdictions, they do not publish guidelines as to how they exercise their discretion.”

The lawyers pointed out the Attorney-General’s Chambers has full discretion to decide who to charge and what to charge the person with. But they also said that there could be mitigating factors why the Attorney-General had decided not to prosecute in the NUS case. Nevertheless, the AGC does not need to explain itself.

Given 12-months conditional warning because student has a high likelihood of rehabilitation and remorseful

The Singapore Police Force said in a statement on Tuesday (Apr 23) that the male student in question, was given a 12-month conditional warning because he had been assessed to have a high likelihood of rehabilitation and was remorseful,

They added that there were additional factors relating to his conduct that were relevant, such as the absence of other obscene materials in any of his devices.

“Police and AGC (Attorney-General’s Chambers) understand public concerns, on ensuring that our laws and enforcement provide sufficient protection for potential victims and sufficient deterrence against would-be offenders. That is the approach that Police and AGC take,” the statement read.

It added that in deciding whether to recommend prosecution for a criminal offence, “a number of factors are considered by Police in each case, including the age of the accused, the likelihood of reoffending/rehabilitation, the extent of remorse shown, whether there are aggravating factors (for example, like circulation of the offending images)”.

“A prosecution, with a possible jail sentence, will likely ruin his entire future, with a permanent criminal record,” said SPF, adding that the criminal justice system “seeks to temper punishment and deterrence, with giving offenders a second chance to reform, based on assessment of the relevant factors”.

“The approach in this case is consistent with the approach taken in other cases. There have been a number of similar cases, where such conditional warnings have been given,” it said.

Current AG is former PM Lee’s personal lawyer

The current Attorney-General of Singapore is Lucien Wong, who used to be the personal lawyer of PM Lee involved in the dispute with PM’s siblings over their late father’s estate. He was formerly chairman and senior partner of Allen & Gledhill.

On 25 November 2016, the Prime Minister’s Office announced Wong’s appointment as Attorney-General. He would be Singapore’s first Attorney-General without prior experience on the Bench nor in the Attorney-General’s Chambers. On 14 January 2017, he commenced his three-year term as Singapore’s ninth Attorney-General, succeeding V K Rajah.

In any case, since Saturday, two online petitions have gathered the signatures of almost 44,000 people, calling for the authorities to take tougher action against the perpetrator caught in NUS.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

17市镇会正式成立,包括盛港市镇会

国家发展部今午(30日)发文告,宣布17市镇理事会在当选议员要求下正式成立,包括盛港市镇会。 新成立的盛港市镇会,以及经过重组的11市镇会,都必须在三个月内完成交接工作。 本届选举前市镇会总数未16个,如今增加一个。 盛港集选区,乃是白沙-榜鹅集选区的部分地区、榜鹅东单选区和盛港西单选区组成。此次选举由工人党获得该区居民委托,林志蔚、何廷儒、蔡庆威和辣玉莎组成的工人党团队,以52.12巴仙得票率,打败行动党的蓝彬明、安宁阿敏和黄志明团队,三人都是原部长。 早前,工人党盛港议员团队,在脸书分享所负责的选区范围。其中何廷儒负责万国(Buangkok)分区、林志蔚负责安谷(Anchorvale)、辣玉莎负责的康埔桦(Compassvale),蔡庆威负责的河谷(Rivervale)。

政府修法遏止网络公审 惟起底偷拍司机前科“符公共利益”

政府将修订防止骚扰法令,未来恶意”起底“他人隐私(doxxing)、或鼓动攻击对方,都能构成犯罪。透过网络、社交媒体,贴大字报或派传单等公开他人隐私、骚扰他人,可判长达六个月监禁,或最高罚款五千元,或两者兼施。 至于鼓动暴力则可面对最高罚款五千元、或一年监禁,或两者兼施。 政府基于近年民间常发生网民资料被“起底”,遭不满者个人私隐在网络和社交媒体被肉搜,诸如姓名、地址、电话工作地点等都被公开,对当事者或其家人造成困扰,其中也不乏被”错起底“的例子。 防止骚扰法令于2014年11月中生效,根据现有法令,受害者如发现有人散播其个人资料的假信息,可向法庭申请撤下相关信息。 修订案将在三方面加强保护受害者,包括制订新罪行、澄清受假信息骚扰的企业,也可诉诸法律,以及扩大针对假信息而发的庭令。 法庭可发出五种庭令,保护受网络假信息影响的受害者: 停止刊登令(stop publication orders) :停止刊登假信息或大量相似的假信息。 更正令(correction orders):刊登者须发出更正通告。…

【冠状病毒19】沙巴占一半 马国10月7日增489确诊

马来西亚卫生部总监诺希山宣布,截止今日(10月7日)中午12时,国内冠状病毒19确诊病例增加了489起,包括487起社区病例和2起入境病例。 诺希山今日发文告指出,马国至今已累计了1万3993起病例,而有74名患者今日获准痊愈出院,将全国康复患者增至1万501人,占总病例的75.04巴仙。 庆幸的是,今日并没有死亡病例,而仍在留医的患者有3351人,有40人在加护病房留医,其中有13人需要使用呼吸辅助器。 489起新增病例中,沙巴占了一半,达282例,吉打有153例、雪兰莪20例、槟城7例、柔佛6例、登嘉楼、霹雳和吉隆坡各4例、砂拉越3例、布城和彭亨各2例、吉兰丹和森美兰各1例。

Security agency at Eight Riversuites replaced; residents claim it is not related to Ramesh Erramalli incident but due to prior complaints of performance

According to an article by The Straits Times (ST) on Friday (1…