A Hougang resident alerted local rabbit rescue group Bunny Wonderland to a rabbit which had died in its cage in the corridor outside her neighbour’s HDB flat on 16 September.

According to the resident, the owner of the rabbit is a teacher at a local neighbourhood primary school.

The resident, who asked to remain anonymous, provided Bunny Wonderland with disturbing images of the carcass. From the poor condition of the body, it is clear that the rabbit had been severely neglected for some time. Its legs were almost completely rotted away, with visible meat fibres hanging off the bone. Its cage was mouldy and there was no food bowl anywhere within.

More pictures taken by the same resident in 2017 show that when it was alive, the rabbit was subjected to dirty surroundings and deprived of a healthy diet.

This was not the first time the resident has had run-ins with her neighbour over rabbits. Several years ago, she had to give up her family’s pet rabbit after her mother fell ill and could no longer care for it. She gave the rabbit to this same neighbour, who allowed it to run freely around the HDB block until it got lost one day and disappeared without a trace.

The recently deceased rabbit had been a gift from its owner’s friend and lived in the corridor for the past four years.

Ian Ong, a Bunny Wonderland volunteer, helped lodge a report with the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) regarding the dead rabbit on the day that it was found.

Unfortunately, by the time the officer arrived on the scene that evening, the owner of the dead rabbit had already disposed of the carcass, so there was no physical evidence that the officer could take back to the lab for post-mortem.

After interviewing the owner, the officer concluded that the rabbit had been adequately cared for because the family had bought food for it. The officer also inspected the empty cage and noted that it was clean.

But the officer promised Ong that further investigations would be conducted.

Ong had once successfully rescued a bunny, named Buffy, from another HDB corridor in April this year and the story was covered by The Online Citizen. Buffy was later adopted by a family which passed Bunny Wonderland’s careful screening process, ensuring that she is given the best standards of living.

Sadly, not all cases of “corridor rabbits” have a happy ending like Buffy’s.

Ong, who takes a special interest in corridor rabbits, said: “People still think that the corridor is the proper place to house a bunny. When you decide to get a pet, you have decided to have another member in your family. Would you let your child or your elderly parent live outside in the corridor?”

Reiterating Bunny Wonderland’s strict stance against keeping rabbits in corridors, its volunteer in charge of outreach Jonathan Tiong said: “Rabbits are exposed to many dangers outside the house, from temperatures that are too hot or too cold, to aggressive animals like dogs and cats. Experts recommend that rabbits are kept indoors, in a fenced-off enclosure of at least one square metre per rabbit. This space should contain its litter box, water source, and a ready supply of hay.”

The carcass of the rabbit which died in its cage along an HDB common corridor on 16 September.
An enlarged view of the dead rabbit’s legs. Note the flesh that is exposed inside the red circle.
When the rabbit was still alive last year, it lived in poor conditions. Notice the following: 1) the food bowl is empty and too small; 2) a very limited amount of hay is strewn in the litter box; 3) the water bottle is brown and the spout is facing the outside of the cage; 4) the rabbit is in direct contact with the bedding material, which can cause a fatal gut blockage if ingested; 5) there appears to be a bit of blue plastic wrapper near the front of the cage, which is a choking hazard.
[divider style=”solid” top=”20″ bottom=”20″]

Bunny Wonderland is a privately run rabbit rescue group. Since its founding in 2013, it has rehomed over 300 rabbits. It does not receive any official support or funding, and its annual expenses of around $150,000 are fully borne by its founder, with assistance from concerned members of the public.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【国会】王瑞杰称 政府持续为弱势员工改善就业前景

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰今日(5日)在国会发表部长说明,指政府将持续为弱势员工改善就业前景,并宣布将由贸工部兼文化、社区及青年部政务部长刘燕玲负责探讨帮助弱势群体。 王瑞杰表示,将协助失业年长的专业人士寻找工作,同时将通过微型工作的形式,把就业带入各个邻里。 他举例,有些工友可能无法到达太远的地点上班,与此同时,邻里商店也面临无人应聘的挑战,若将这些就业机会集合在潜在的接触点,例如社会服务中心、民众联络所、劳动力发展局MyCareersFuture网站,以及“新心相连”就业与技能中心,当局便能为他们进行职业配对。 另一方面,王瑞杰指出,今年5月在坚毅向前预算案宣布后取得了很好的进展,但全国就业理事会仍需努力。 他表示,全国就业理事会与不同企业一同探讨,如何提供培训和实习机会,未来也会将其转为工作机会,但眼下的关键是确保工人知道,以及成功地配对。 他说, “全国就业理事会正在和企业紧密合作聘用中途转业者,并将受到冠病疫情打击的航空业及旅游业员工,重新部署到医疗保健以及幼儿培育这些急需人手、员工技能也得到重视的领域。”

PP v. Tey Tsun Hang: AGC denies link to Professor’s politically charged academic publications

By: Atticus The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has denied any link between the…

申请法援挑战政府假消息裁定 人权律师质疑可行度

政府将在下月于国会寻求通过《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》。然而该法被指赋予部长过多的权力、制衡机制不足,也引起公民社会的质疑和忧虑。 在上周四(4月3日)律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉出席管理大学对话会。针对一名与会者质疑若假消息来自政府又如何处置,对此他打包票指出,政府并不会凌驾于法律体系之外,完全不受到监督。 反假消息法也被指透过法律刑责,来制造寒蝉效应,造成民众因担忧招惹官司而被高昂诉讼费缠身,而不敢再批评政府政策。 对于官司费的担忧,唐振辉认为,目前国内已有充足的经济和法律援助供有需要者申请,对部长的更正指示作出上诉。 不过,人权律师M拉维就在脸书发文,质疑上述申请法律援助来上诉的实际可行性。 “老实说,我不曾听闻有人申请法律援助来挑战政府的决定。就算可以,还有大部分人都不符合申请法律援助条件,没办法这么做。” 在新起草的防假消息法案下,部长若判断某消息为假消息并可能威胁公共利益,就可下达指示要求更正或撤下。 然而,令拉维感到不安的是,假设政府本身,涉及借用官方媒体散播假消息,有关法案却没有明确途径让公民挑战政府。在该法案第61条文下,部长还能发出“免死金牌”给特定人物或机构,比如说,可以发出指示,豁免某部门或官方媒体,不受法案的对付。 他质疑,普通老百姓怎么可能负担得起动辄至少八万元的诉讼费,到高庭去挑战部长对假新闻的裁定有误。 去年担任蓄意散播假消息特选委员会主席的张有福曾指出,若对政府的裁定有不满,应有足够的管道,且上诉过程不会太繁琐。 他在昨日也接受《联合早报》采访,认为尽管新法案赋予部长权利,迅速采取措施以维护国家利益,但高庭可对其决定进行审核,而不是由政府全权定夺。 他同意,应允许不满者尽快做出申诉,而不是让他们耗费数年和上千元庭费来打官司。“既然部长有权迅速介入,要求个人或网络平台更正或撤下信息,那另一方上诉时也理应获得加速审理,以确保公平。”…