Ms Lee with a resident Photo: Lee Lilian Facebook]
Ms Lee with a resident Photo: Lee Lilian Facebook]
Ms Lee with a resident Photo: Lee Lilian Facebook]

“As parents, we are always concerned about the well being of our child,” Member of Parliament (MP) for Punggol East single-member constituency (SMC), Lee Lilian, said on her Facebook page on Sunday.

“Therefore it is certainly a relief to hear Minister Tan [Chuan-Jin] say that the ministry is considering harmonizing the benefits for single parents,” Ms Lee, a Workers’ Party MP, said.

Last week, Mr Tan, who is the minister in charge at the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), said that “unwed working mothers may soon get the same benefits as married ones under a review being conducted by MSF.”

One of the differences often highlighted is how unwed mothers get eight weeks of maternity leave paid for by their employers, while married mothers get 16 weeks, and do not benefit from the Handicapped Child Relief, nor the Baby Bonus cash gift.

“My sense is that the public understands and sympathises with single unwed mothers; I see it on the ground,” Mr tan told the media. “When I came in, I asked my colleagues to see whether we can review some of these things. Some of the differentiation that exists, could we harmonise it?”

The government has long been afraid that any changes in policies may signal a shift in its position that the nucleus family must consist of married parents with children.

Mr Tan, however, feel that perhaps it is time for a review.

“The support provided for single parents, single mothers, unwed mothers really isn’t just about that Baby Bonus – I know there are differences, but actually the help extended needs to be much more extensive.

“It’s about healthcare availability, it’s about education opportunities and the support that comes with it. So, on the one hand, while there are some differences that exist today the help isn’t just in those areas. Actually the more fundamental issue is that broader extent of help.”

Ms Lee, while welcoming the proposed review, nonetheless says it was “ridiculous that we are even discussing this.”

“Married or single, they are parents,” she said.

Ms Lee has been a long-time advocate for single parents to be treated equally as married ones – a position she has held as far back as 2008, when she would blog about the issue.

She had also raised her concerns during her election rally speeches in Punggol East in 2013.

“An unmarried single mom will not qualify for the tax relief for a foreign domestic worker and is entitled to only 2 days of childcare leave per year for a child below the age of 7,” she said in her speech in Parliament in February 2013. “Her child is considered “illegitimate” by the government. Despite this she will still need to pay taxes and her son will still need to do national service.”

She said that “for a country suffering from a fertility crisis, each child should be valued, and not punished simply because he or she is born to unmarried parents.”

“Parents-to-be have many concerns, especially given the high cost of living and increasingly competitive environment we live in,” Ms Lee said. “This includes the loss of income when they have to drop out of work to look after their children, or experiencing a drop in their career prospects, when they have worked so hard from school days to make a successful career. Many parents are concerned about financial insecurity and how to balance having children and their careers, especially so for mothers.”

“I hope that the government will appreciate the needs of the child, as well as the value of the bond between a mother and her child, which is non-measurable in monetary terms. This is not about encouraging more single mothers, but ensuring better and fair support for children who have been born to them.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AVA: Eggs sold at coffee shop in Ang Mo Kio real

Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) has responded to a query…

328 cases of Zika infection, as 14 new cases confirmed

The Ministry of Health (MOH) announced that as of 12 pm on…

刀下不留人:48小时内国家处决了四条生命

《联合早报》今日报导,大法官梅达顺、上诉庭法官朱迪珀拉卡斯和郑永光等三司,推翻早前高庭减轻控状判决,维持30岁马国保安人员因走私二醋吗啡的死刑判决。 在我国,政府认为死刑是控制毒品危机的措施,例如我国外交部长维文曾在2016年,在联合国大会上重申新加坡保留死刑的立场,也坚称死刑在我国获得国人“很高的支持”。 小编仔细阅读了以上有关判死的报导,了解到有关马国保安人员名为葛毕(Gobi a/l Avedian),在2014年间12月11日,将超过40.22克的二醋吗啡(diamorphine,海洛英违禁成分),藏在电单车内,在过关卡时被逮捕。 审讯揭露,被告乃是“跑腿”,声称雇用者告知他只是运送“巧克力毒品”,就算被抓到刑法也不严重。 被告女儿患肿瘤急需手术费 被告在新加坡当保安,薪资越为1400-1800元间。但是,年幼女儿患有毒性肿瘤,他们为女儿安排2015年1月开刀,需5万令吉(约1万6500新元),他和妻子只能筹到一般款项。 由于急需用钱,葛毕只能铤而走险,接下友人介绍的运毒工作,每包成功过关毒品克获得500令吉酬劳。 三司在昨早下判时表示,被告仅凭自己认为不认识毒品,不足以不知自己罪名严重的情况下犯案,他明知自己在运毒,酬劳异常高,理应察觉事有蹊跷,“若他真的害怕死刑不敢走私“严重”的毒品,理应竭尽所能查明毒品真正性质,而不是单单相信毒贩和友人片面之词。” 三司把葛毕的罪状改为走私A级毒品罪名。他为筹募女儿手术费铤而走险,反而搭上了自己一条命。他的女儿和妻子的处境如何,我们不得而知。从报导中,我们也不知,教唆葛毕运毒的幕后黑手、背后操盘整个毒品事业的大毒枭,至今仍逍遥法外。 真得是因为葛毕自己愚昧、不够小心谨慎,误信谗言,才“罪有应得”吗?…

Rat found in House Brand basmati rice packet

Facebook user Vegnesh Jodimani shared a shocking discovery on Saturday, 2 March…