ST Forum page letter
ST Forum page letter
ST Forum page letter

The sight of so many shopping malls around this tiny island is an observable fact which is starting to concern some.

A letter to the Straits Times Forum page on Monday has expressed concerns that these malls are not only taking up our limited number of green spaces, they are also turning the shopping experience into a banal one.

“There are far too many stores and malls in Singapore, and not enough shoppers,” Ms Diana Ong Ing Cheng wrote.

She said that as vacancy rates rise, these malls are adjusting their tenant mix, but they end up bringing in the same types of tenants, such as food and beverage outlets and tuition centres.

“These malls actually look desolate, and shopping is becoming utterly banal,” she said.

She cited the “large parcel of land in Holland Road” which is “slated to offer more retail and dining options to enhance the area’s buzz, as well as create new community spaces for people to gather and interact.”

“The site is currently a beautiful plot of green space,” Ms Ong said. “Instead of adding to the oversaturated retail and food and beverage scene, couldn’t a neighbourhood park be created to serve as a community space?”

“Many green spaces have been given up to build malls,” she added.

It is a lament heard more often now in Singapore as skyscrapers, malls and flats pop up on virtually every empty plot of land here.

Indeed, some feel Singapore has become a concrete jungle, despite all the new landscaped parks which the authorities have installed.

In 2013, it was reported that by 2030, some 700,000 new public housing flats would have been built. Some of these will be in new towns such as Bidadari, Tampines North and Tengah.

National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan assured Singaporeans then that the quality of life will not be compromised even as Singapore develops.

But the reality may be quite different, especially as Singapore moves closer to the working parameter of a 6.9 million population – or even more – by 2030.

Various observers have thrown up figures from 8 million to 10 million as possible population targets for Singapore.

The city will inevitably be more crowded, with less personal and green spaces for each of us, and more malls, food centres, and flats needed to cater to the expansion in population on a physically limited sized land area.

According to the Government’s Land Use Plan, the aim is that Singapore will remain largely green, despite the expected increase in population.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH: Not enough money for vaccinations, go tap immediate family member’s Medisave

A member of the public Andrew Seow Chwee Guan wrote to ST…

义顺居民提废377A议题 申诉遭李美花议员冷待

推动性少数权益、废除377A的一名自愿者,申诉在会见居民活动,欲向义顺集选区议员李美花提呈请愿书时,却遭后者冷待。 有关名为符宝健(译音)的志愿者,在本周一出席义顺集选区议员李美花的会见活动,想征询议员对性少数权益和废除377A的意见。 同时,符宝健也准备提交一份,有859名该区居民签名,支持废除377A条文的请愿书。 符宝健当晚和三名友人一同出席。轮到他们一行人时,李美花在和众人握手后,首先询问他们之间的关系,其中一人说不是来自义顺选区,但为了同一课题而来。 提交859居民签署的请愿书 不过,李美花要那名非选区居民离开,至于符宝健的另两位义顺同伴,也被要求离开,并再另拿号码排队。 符宝健说,议员称“她知道这是什么情况”,因为“其他议员也遇过”。 “等到我的三名友人离开后,李美花才叫我说出来意。我就告诉她,想了解他对于377A课题的看法。” 符宝健称,李美花听后,只留下一句:“我还有其他居民面对真正的问题”,就离开房间。只留下符宝健一人,被冷待了15分钟。 他说,写信志工有来到房间,但一直避开和他接触,而是与其他居民交谈。最终符宝健告诉他,即便不想和他对话,也好让他转交请愿书给议员。 即便如此,职工也只是挥挥手,请他交给另一名志工。 “感到议员拒绝对话”…

Jonathan Livingston Seagull

Temple of Fine Arts (TFA) presents a unique dance-drama.

没拒绝外国人 司徒国辉:关键在遴选外籍人才素质!

日前,政府统计单位民情联系组(REACH)发布报告,指民调显示多数国人同意对外国人保持开放的态度。 一些报章评论和报导,也似乎在呼应贸工部长陈振声等官方的“主旋律”,强调“我国应持续保持开放”;有者也指探讨收紧外籍专才的政策,会否有损我国“唯才是用”的声誉? 不过,本地食评家司徒国辉也在脸书发文,提醒这些论述都“错重点”,而应该探讨我们需要怎样的外籍人才素质? “你的阿公和太太爷,五湖四海飘洋过海到狮城,用血汗共同创建这个都会,且他们成功了。他们是真的全心全意要让这里变得更好。” 他认为本地更需要这样的人才,关键在于将来筛选人才到我们的小红点时,应该用更小的“滤器”。 司徒国辉也表示,实则一些外籍人士对建设我国亦贡献良多,“我甚至认识他们当中一些人(甚至成为朋友),从他们身上学到很多。” 但是,他也提醒,其他的似乎都只是领取高薪的“长期旅客”,拖家带小到我们的地方,把自家的习俗或习惯强加在本地。 今年8月,就已有一位退休银行家揭露一些大型、老牌外籍银行,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,“已是业界熟知之事”,并呼吁当局应严密审查金融领域的这种现象。 有鉴于民间的呼声,政府不得不作出回应,例如人力部把S准证和就业准证的薪金门槛调高,有意借此减少外籍人士进入本地就业市场。 deh, it’s not…