Singapore human rights group MARUAH has issed a statement to state it’s concerns about the Media Development Authority’s decision to close down The Real Singapore.

MARUAH’s Ppresident, Ms Braema Mathi, said that MDA should have identified to the TRS editors the specific content that was objectionable and gave them the right to justify why a shut down was not warranted, and for MDA to clearly justify its position.

The statement is appended in full below.


maruah

The suspension of The Real Singapore’s licence to operate raises important issues on the freedom of speech.

As a human rights organisation, MARUAH is deeply concerned with these, and recognises the complexities of reconciling the need for space for free expression and the need for responsible speech.

Much of the content of The Real Singapore goes against what we have championed, namely equality and non-discrimination.

The Real Singapore’s sensational journalism and encouragement of xenophobia against foreign workers do, indeed, have to be tackled.

However, the Media Development Authority’s (MDA) draconian measures are not the best way to do so, as they legitimise excessive intervention by the state and set a precedent for the diminution of our online space.

The draconian measures are also problematic in terms of their implementation.

As some people have pointed out, some other sites have been just as guilty in stirring hatred, but have been spared punishment.

We suggest that due process and natural justice require that the MDA, at a minimum, notify the editors of The Real Singapore of the specific items of content that the MDA believes to be unlawful, give them a reasonable opportunity to show why the site should not be ordered shut, and provide clear and detailed written grounds for its decision.

In particular, the MDA should explain why it decided to take action against The Real Singapore but not other sites that have published similar content, and why it believes the entire website had to be taken down instead of just the specific articles that it appropriately determines to be unlawful.

We also recommend that government officials openly and publicly engage bloggers and newsmakers of different ilk on an ongoing basis, to develop a better understanding of each other and to enable the Government to respond to inaccuracies and falsehoods in a more timely and effective manner.

The diversity of Singapore’s populace is reflected in the diversity of opinions online.

Censoring an entire platform without due process does Singapore and Singaporeans no favours, however much we may dislike its approach or the things it publishes.

Braema Mathi (Ms)
President, MARUAH Singapore

Subscribe
Notify of
59 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

举牌吁川普推动两岸和平 璩美凤一人集会险触《公共秩序法》

台湾政界闻人璩美凤于昨天下午3.20分,前往朝鲜领导人金正恩下榻的瑞吉酒店外举牌,呼吁美国总统川普推动海峡两岸和平。 她向现场媒体声明,川普推动南北韩和平互动,然而中国大陆和台湾两岸的中华儿女却走向战争,若川普能让两岸和平,才能为美国、全亚洲带来最大的利益。 据《联合早报》在脸书专页分享的视频,她拿着一张写着:“Trump – Peace Korea, Trump – War Taiwan, Nobel Peace…

PM says we can’t outsource security to anyone else but SPF does outsource its job to Nepalese

The recent death of yet another serviceman, Aloysius Pang, has riled the…

是什么样的领导,会选择抗疫时刻暗示要大选?

原文:维权律师张素兰 在看了本周日(15日),国家发展部长黄循财在记者会上的讲话,以及外交部长维文本月11日接受CNBC电视台的访谈,我感到很愤怒— 但不是生气这些部长,而是总理。 选区范围检讨委会上周出炉后,我国总理李显龙就在隔日(14日)在脸书发文写道: “我们有两种选择,要么期望疫情能在本届政府任期结束前就稳定下来。如此我们得以在正常情况下举行选举– 但对此我们无法确定。 又或者我们提早召开选举,既然知道我们将进入飓风,那么选出全新获委托和任期的新政府,可以与国人携手应对当前严峻事务… …。” 总理干嘛在这时暗示选举呢? 看看黄循财和维文,已经为了防堵疫情劳心劳力。 那些仍滞留国外重灾区、需要带回家的国人,他们要为他们的安全着想;他们担忧疫情对经济的冲击,想法设法减少对商业和国人生活的冲击。他们要顾虑我们的医疗系统是否能应付增长的病例、考量是否要关闭学府等,他们也落实边境管制。 看看他们疲惫和焦虑的脸吧。当记者询及总理要挟将提早举行大选时,维文和黄循财都避开了这问题。黄循财说当前他无暇去想选举的事,“选举并非当务之急。”他们都在应对一场全球疫情,也决意要防堵之。…

LTA: EIA report concludes "moderate" impact of Cross Island Line project if mitigation measures are heeded

The Land Transport Authority has just released a report on the second…