In a Facebook post, Minister for Law K Shanmugam denounced the actions of the man who had hit Amos Yee, just as the 16 year old was attending court yesterday for his bail review in relation to him posting a video critical of former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew.

Amos Yee's assailant flees the scene after striking him across the face. (Image by Mediacorp)
Amos Yee’s assailant flees the scene after striking him across the face. (Image by Mediacorp)

The unidentified assailant was filmed by media walking up to Yee and striking him on the face. As the assailant fled the scene, he could also be heard shouting, “Come and sue me!”

We also understand the police has confirmed that a police report has been filed against Yee’s assailant and investigations are under way.

Mr Shanmugam also revealed that the charge of harassment against Yee has been stood down. This does not mean the charges are dropped, but that the prosecution will proceed with two other charges first, according to a spokesperson from the AGC.

The following was Mr Shanmugam’s Facebook post:

Amos Yee was assaulted as he was going to court today. That is quite unacceptable.

Amos made some statements which are offensive to Christians. He is being charged for that and for an obscenity related issue. ( I understand that the charge in respect of his statements on Mr Lee Kuan Yew have been stood down.)

People may have strong feelings about Amos (or anyone else who is charged). But we have to leave it to the courts to deal with them. Taking the law into one’s own hands cannot be condoned.

Rule of Law means respecting the legal process. If everyone starts taking the law into his or her own hands, then we will no longer be a civilised society. I hope that the attacker will be caught quickly, and is dealt with appropriately.

However, Yee’s lawyer Mr Alfred Dodwell informed TOC that he was not alerted to the standing down of the harassment charge at any point during the court proceedings yesterday. He also said:

“I want all three charges to go ahead. The Prosecution should either drop the charge or go ahead with it. We can’t have it hanging over our client’s head. There seems to be no reason to stand down the charge as it is in relation to the same video.”

11195273_10153801555168502_1225319976_n
Amos’ eyes and cheeks were swollen after the blow. (Image by Alfred Dodwell)

Yee is currently in remand as he was held to be in breach of his bail conditions when he posted on his blog and his Facebook page earlier yesterday. The current bail amount stands at $30,000.

Vincent Law, a youth counselor who was Amos Yee's first bailor.
Vincent Law, a youth counselor who was Amos’ first bailor.

Vincent Law, the Youth Counsellor who first bailed Yee out when the bail amount stood at $20,000, has discharged himself. When asked why, he said:

I discharged myself as Amos was not willing to abide by the conditions of the bail. I would also like to add that I hope the media would just leave him alone. After all, he’s only a kid.

Furthermore, I think Amos should be assessed psychologically, which was the main reason why I bailed him in the first place. Unfortunately, the appointment at a local institute could not be pushed forward earlier. I hope the prison authorities would facilitate his assessment while he is in remand.

Amos Yee's Lawyer, Alfred Dodwell, speaking to the press. (Image by Ng Yi Shu)
Amos’ lawyer, Mr Dodwell, speaking to the press. (Image by Ng Yi Shu)

Yee’s lawyer, Mr Dodwell, who released a press statement to clarify why he chose to defend Amos, indicated that it was the client’s choice on whether they want to comply with the conditions of bail.

“We always advise our clients to comply with all conditions. But if a client chooses not to comply, we don’t father the client. We tell the client what to do and if the client refuses to do so, we do ask why, but we don’t probe further than that. They face the consequences of their actions.”

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MFA: M’sians with work permits will continue to work in S’pore with appropriate health screenings

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) released an official statement on its…

Lawrence Wong: If and when a vaccine is available, every Singaporean who needs it will get it at an affordable price

During a national broadcast regarding the post-COVID-19 situation in Singapore on Tuesday…

拉维:苏利亚申请领储蓄诉讼 获与公积金局友好和解

人权律师拉维在今日(15日)于个人脸书更新近况,指出丈夫苏利亚,为患癌妻子向公积金局申请提取公积金储蓄的诉讼,已获得与当局友好和解。 他透露,在今早的预审会议上,双方已告知法院诉讼已撤回,而拉维也祈愿莎若吉妮能早日康复。 上周三,拉维透露入禀高庭以申请强制令要求公积金局,准许印裔丈夫苏利亚把自己的公积金储蓄,转移给妻子作抗癌医疗费用。 此前本社报导,苏利亚希望能治好妻子的病,向中央公积金局申请,将自己的普通和特别户头存款,转移到妻子的保健储蓄(medisave)户头,好让妻子能继续抗癌。但是,公积金局拒绝了苏利亚的要求。 47岁的印裔妇女莎若吉妮在2016年底被诊断患有卵巢癌,自此他们一家也饱受煎熬,财务状况也陷入困顿。如今莎若吉妮的癌症病况已进入第四期。 不过,中央公积金局在上周五(12日)和卫生部发表联合声明作出回应,解释莎若吉妮选择在伊丽莎白私人医院和百汇癌症中心(PCC)寻求治疗。百汇癌症中心和国大医院告知莎若吉妮夫妇,她的癌况近末期已无法治愈。 “莎若吉妮选择继续在私立、无津贴的百汇癌症中心接受治疗, 她的终身健保到目前为止为她支付六万元医疗和住院费用。而加上她的私人保险,保险至今为她支付了30万元,涵盖了她在百汇和伊丽莎白医院90巴仙的医疗费。” 公积金局续解释莎若吉妮获得的保障,指自2017年10月,莎若吉妮可从乐龄健保每月领取1100元,至今累积2万3000元,得以为他们减轻财务负担。从该局允准的保险配套,迄今为止为她支付了51万新元,而从他们夫妇俩的公积金户口共提取了3万4000元。 公积金局的此番回应,也导致网民质疑苏利亚夫妇,既然知道私人医院无津贴,为何莎若吉妮仍坚持在私人医院治疗,而且认为他们已经得到终身健保等医保配套的照顾。其中网民MIke Ng也质疑,此前的访谈短片,就如同只是单方面说法。 对此,莎若吉妮的丈夫苏利亚,不得不在公积金局脸书回应,呼吁那些指责他和妻子的经历是假新闻的,不要太快下定论,“如人饮水,冷暖自知,我们也有证据证明,国大医院教授建议与其让内子接受治疗,应该要陪着她去走走看看。对此,当我申请提取我的普通户头存款时,也有反映给公积金局。”…

全球超过94国都有直播国会议事!

尽管遭到议员和民众等人敦促应直播国会议事,特别是在疫情下让国民能直接、即时地跟进国会讨论的政策。不过,政府对此事似乎兴致缺缺。 更甚的是,傅海燕新闻秘书 Michele Khoo在回应读者评论时,更指出直播恐怕会让国会沦为“表演平台”,国会无意进行现场直播。 新加坡常自诩由第一世界政府管理的第一世界国家。公民理应由知情权,透过直接管道了解国会中讨论的政策、国会表现等。 然而,在国会直播此事项上,新加坡和其他国家相比似乎相形见绌。全球有多达94个国家,包括世界大国:美国、英国、中国、俄罗斯等,乃至东南亚国家如邻国马来西亚、印尼、泰国、菲律宾等,都有进行国会或议院直播! 这些国家或是透过电视、电台广播或是网络直播方式,让民众也能即时地观赏或收听国会议事。 其他有直播国会议事的先进国也包括:瑞士、加拿大、爱尔兰、法国、意大利、南韩、日本、芬兰、匈牙利、奥地利、瑞典、希腊、比利时、冰岛、荷兰、丹麦、卢森堡、西班牙、波兰、保加利亚捷克等等。 事实上,在新加坡通讯及新闻部旗下,仍有一个网络直播频道:https://www.parliamentwebcast.sg/。然而却需要账号和密码才能登入,一般民众是无法登入观赏的。相信这是供政府人员或媒体跟进国会议事使用的专门频道。