Company under investigation by Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) continues to send out invoices to businesses asking for payment for services which they did not request for or use.
Singapore Company Register
Earlier this year in June, TOC reported how one company which called itself the Singapore Company Register, sent letters to various businesses and companies, ask for “verification” of the details of companies in a mail and state that if the companies does not verify their information in 2 weeks, the information of the companies “will be deleted from the Singapore Company Register database”
Those who “verify” their details with the company and register with them would have to pay a fee of S$490 per year.
However, National regulator of business entities and public accountants, Accounting And Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) stated that it has “no links whatsoever” to the company and mentioned that companies are “not obliged” to provide details to them and should only update their information with ACRA themselves.
TOC also reported on how the company sent a defamation letter to a blogger for her blogpost on its questionable business operations.
Since June, Data Register Pte Ltd has been under investigation by CAD and faces a total of 104 charges in court brought against it by ACRA.
ACRA had also issued 4 public alerts about the company, warning businesses not to sign up with them.
Just recently, reader, Dr. Petunia Lee approached TOC and shared that she has received a reminder letter and a legal letter from this same company threatening her to pay up.
reminder letter

But the thing is that Dr. Lee said that she had not registered any of her business data with Data Register Pte Ltd, and therefore very surprised to receive an invoice and a threatening legal letter from Data Register Pte Ltd.
The reminder letter states that she has yet to pay the charges indicated on the invoice which was sent to her on 13 January 2014 and that she will not have to pay the late interest of the sum owing if she pays up promptly.
The subsequent “legal letter” written by Data Register Pte Ltd went further by saying that it would take her to task through their lawyers “Rodyk & Davidson, LLP”, if she does not pay up $490 for “subscription fees”. In addition, there is a 8% per annum penalty for late payment.
This is despite the fact that she had subscribed to nothing at all from Data Register Pte Ltd.
She states she feel being both threatened and penalised via their actions.
“Should not our country’s laws be re-defined to bring such companies to justice? I did not fall for Data Register Pte Ltd’s shenanigans but others might.” said Dr. Lee.
She also asked about the investigation of the company which started earlier this year.
“This company has an address and a phone number. The phone number does not answer, and I have not checked out the address. The company does provide a bank account number (which is bona fide or else their scam will not work). Surely, the police can track these perpetrators through that bank account?”
When contacted by TOC on 22 December about the matter, CAD said that they are still currently in the midst of investigations into the company and advise all who have received the letters to seek legal advise whether to pay the company or not.
In the meantime, online vigilante “SMRT feedback” had earlier announced on its facebook page that it will be embarking on an operation against Data Register Pte Ltd.

The fanpage had earlier garnered much attention during the Sim Lim Square saga after digging out information about Jover Chew, the owner of Mobile Air Pte Ltd and its action against him.

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSA Marine worker found dead near Riau island

A Singaporean man who was reported to be missing after falling during…

PAP’s Lee Hsien Loong accepts Ivan Lim’s withdrawal, says the controversy over his candidature was unfortunate

People’s Action Party (PAP) Secretary-General Lee Hsien Loong has accepted Ivan Lim’s…

唐振辉国会抨击 脸书拒绝撤下有关总理不实文章

社交媒体脸书(Facebook)早前拒绝撤下时事网站States Times Review(STR)不实贴文,律政部高级政务部长唐振辉昨日在国会抨击脸书公司,指不能依靠这类社交服务平台来过滤假信息。 唐振辉在国会答复议员询问时说,脸书声称公司没有明文禁止涉及假信息的贴文,除非贴文内容有可能立即引发暴力行为或造成伤害。他不同意上述说法。 他批评脸书“任由自己成为散播谎言和虚假消息的平台”,从而毒害和分化社会,激发排外情绪,对脸书表达“惊讶”和失望。 由此,唐振辉得出结论,肯定国会特委会建议,需要立法打击网络假消息,保护国家。 他是昨日在国会答复武吉巴督区议员穆仁理的口头提问时,这么表示。 唐振辉指出,STR在本月5日发布一篇文章,指我国总理李显龙和马国前首相纳吉,涉嫌协助一马公司洗黑钱,透过签署隆新高铁和水供协议,来换取对新国有利条件,STR文章内容引述《砂拉越报告》总编克莱尔的访谈内容。 唐振辉称,有关文章贴文在脸书散播迅速,截至11月8日,已被转发1600次,有七名脸书用户在三天内、共45次转发该贴文至39个群组,预计触及80万户用户。 他说,类似的散播模式已有先例,例如曾有人撰文称美国海军存在弱点,文章原本刊载在默默无闻的网站,后来却被一家主流媒体转载并在社媒广传,结果多家外国知名媒体也跟进报导。 新加坡金融管理局已在本月8日针对STR贴文报案;驻马最高专员公署澄清后,马国媒体《中国报》也已撤下有关报导。 唐振辉批评,即便眼下没有发生暴力或人身伤害,但毒液会慢慢释放,他担忧假以时日会引发暴力。…

美朝领导人新加坡历史性峰会 分析员:获国际曝光  朝鲜最大赢家

美国总统川普与朝鲜领导人金正恩在本周二,于新加坡达成历史会面,并签署共同协议。经济学人情报组织分析员安薇达芭素点评,朝鲜民主人民共和国长期受孤立,借助峰会受到国际媒体瞩目,国家地位在国际舞台受肯定,成为此次会面最大赢家。 安薇达接受‘网络公民’访问时说,朝鲜一直努力获得国际社会的支持,如今借此平台在国际媒体前获得曝光率。相信川金峰会的画面,经过修饰后,会成为朝鲜官营电视台最佳宣传品,在国内重播好几个月。 她认为,朝鲜从国际媒体的报导获得正面宣传是肯定的。朝鲜人民看到的新闻大多经过修饰,以符合金氏政权的宣传需求,有趣的是,当地官媒也开始讨论与美国关系的转变,这可能是金正恩想为其权力塑造新的参考框架。 川普和金正恩在新加坡嘉佩乐酒店的会面后,签署一份重要联合声明,安薇达分析,内容虽然含糊,但至少肯定了朝鲜半岛去核化、安全保障以及美朝推动半岛建立持久稳固和平三点重要决策。 “协议并未提及撤销制裁去核化的时间表,基本上是重申美国国务卿蓬佩奥与朝鲜高官先前的谈判,这说明两位领袖都按照事先安排的剧本演出,致力缓和朝鲜半岛的紧张关系。“ 朝鲜暂缓核计划 “可审查及不可逆的去核化”并不在声明内,有可能双方还未达成共识。经济学人情报组织也推测,台面下朝鲜仍未完全同意解除核武,只是放缓发展核计划,换取进一步的谈判。 针对记者询问,尽管朝鲜有不良人权记录,且与他国甚少交往,会否有更多国家在峰会后,愿意与朝鲜建立邦交?安薇达不这么认为。 她提醒,朝鲜并非完全断绝外交往来,事实上包括拉丁美洲和非洲等地多个国家与朝鲜有双边关系,甚至视朝鲜为盟友。“这与台湾的情况不同,朝鲜的国家主权地位从未受到质疑。” 针对川金峰会后,朝鲜对未来的布局,经济学人情报组织推测,金正恩当前需要向国内合理化他所作的一切努力,当中包括重新与中国及南韩重修旧好、开放边境以及资金逐渐回归本国。 鉴于核计划已成为朝鲜工人最主要的经济生命线,金正恩如何落实去核化协议也备受瞩目。