By Howard Lee
Last month, the Ministry of Manpower issued a media release to identify five companies in the construction sector that have been charged under the Employment Act (EA), one of which has been awarded a S$368 million contract by the Land Transport Authority.
The announcement by MOM, issued on 5 May 2014, indicated that:

“These cases came to light when MOM conducted proactive checks at construction work sites and feedback surfaced through workers and third-parties. Construction workers from three of the companies were found to have excessive working hours. Under the EA, working more than 72 hours of overtime a month is prohibited, except in certain exempted circumstances. Four of the companies had also failed to pay their workers on time, or had withheld their workers’ salaries or made unauthorised deductions from them.”

Of these five companies, Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co. Ltd was found to have the most contraventions, with 47 charges laid against them. These include:

  • 19 counts under the EA for making deductions other than deductions authorised under the provisions of the Employment Act.
  • 12 counts under EA for not granting paid annual leave to employees who worked beyond 3 months of service.
  • 8 counts under EA for making employees work overtime beyond 72 hours a month without exemption.
  • 8 counts under EA for failure to provide paid holiday at gross rate of pay, where the employees were not working on that public holiday.

MOM indicated that the case against Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd is expected to be heard on 19 June 2014.
However, Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co. Ltd earlier appeared in the news, when the LTA issued a media release on 27 May 2014, indicating that:

“The construction of Shenton Way station (T225) and its associated tunnels has been awarded to Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd at a contract sum of approximately S$368 million… They are currently involved in a number of LTA’s projects including the design and construction of Newton station and associated tunnels for Downtown Line 2, the construction of tunnels between Tampines East station and Upper Changi station for Downtown Line 3 and the construction of Gul Circle station and viaducts for Tuas West Extension.”

The two announcements were separated by a little more than a week – nine days, or seven working days to be exact.
If found guilty, Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd might face stiff penalties. Singapore’s Employment Act states that employers guilty of breaching the Act for pay matters, for instance, “shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000, and for a second or subsequent offence to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.”
Given the proximity of the two offence and the likely high penalties that Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd could face, TOC sent a few queries to LTA, asking:

  • If LTA aware that Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd was being investigated for the charged offences.
  • If LTA has a position on contractors who have been found guilty of flouting employment regulations, and if so what that position might be.
  • If LTA has a contingency plan in place to ensure that works continue on schedule, should the company be found guilty of these offences and have to face significant penalties.

At time of publishing, LTA has not replied. We will include the agency’s reply once we receive them.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Reasonable to act against those who betray citizenship allegiance: Aussie PM

“Regardless of how we gain it, Australian citizenship is an extraordinary privilege…

【国会】应对疫情之际调涨税收、费用 梁文辉忧无助坚定民众对政府信任

在当前面对疫情和经济等严峻挑战,国人对政府的信任尤为重要。不过,前进党非选区议员梁文辉就指出,政府一方面出台应付冠病危机的措施,但同时又急着增加税收和水电等收费,并无助于坚定民众对政府领导的信念。 梁文辉在本月14日在国会参与副总理兼财长王瑞杰的部长声明。他列举了近两周内宣布增加成本的部分,首先在9月29日,全民重症保险计划终身健保明年初起,从以往的11.5巴仙增至35.4巴仙,即指保费从每年的1千元增至1千350元。 不过随着保费上涨,保险范围有随之增加,梁文辉坦言,对于因疫情受到打击的人民来说,确实是令人欣慰的消息。 其次,9月30日,新加坡能源有限公司(SP Group)宣布在今年最后一个季度(自10月至12月)上调了9.3巴仙的电费。 “自2012年开始,电力市场自由化以来,却赚取数十亿元,在首次电费上涨后,就在电费上涨的路上“前进”,即使在新加坡人正遭受疫情的打击。” 尽管价格上涨是因为电力公司的成本相对提高,但梁文辉认为,新加坡能源公司可以轻易地从过去赚取的利润中吸收,而不是将增加成本的费用推到消费者身上。 “增加税收和收费显然无法借此提高人们的信心。与此同时,政府却承诺给出冠病19补贴措施,如同给人民一颗糖后,再给你一巴掌。” 另一方面,梁文辉也指出陆路交通局上周也宣布,自10月12日起,将会在中央高速公路六个收费门架提高电子道路收费(ERP)1元,以缓解高峰期的拥挤路况。 梁文辉认为,这无疑给新加坡的家庭户增加了数百元的支出,而且也质疑是否在未来,消费税也会因此提高。 “这些难道不能推迟到以后再实施吗?新加坡能源公司能否以过去的利润来吸收关税的增长?ERP不能再缓缓吗?保费增长也不能再推迟一到两年,因为目前的保险索赔毕竟仍远远低于收取的保费。 梁文辉也表示,虽然政府一直不想透露国家储备状况,但根据目前以公布的资料而言,截至2020年3月底,我国共拥有1.35万亿元的金融资产。…

MND issues statement to express concerns over KPMG’s report on APHETC

Ministry of National Development (MND) has announced that it is deeply concerned…