The employer of blogger Roy Ngerng, Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) announced on 10 June that it has terminated Mr Roy Ngerng’s contract with immediate effect. TTSH claimed that this was due to Ngerng’s conduct which it deemed “incompatible with the values and standards expected of employees”, and for misusing resources at work to pursue “personal and non-job-related interests”.
Ngerng is currently in a legal dispute with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong as a result of a defamatory blog post he made, for which Ngerng had apologised to the PM.
In a statement issued to media, TTSH indicated that “Mr Ngerng’s conduct was incompatible with the values and standards we expect of our employees. While our staff are free to pursue their personal interests outside work, they must conduct themselves properly, honourably and with integrity. In particular, they cannot defame someone else without basis, which essentially means knowingly stating a falsehood to the public,” TTSH was quoted by media as saying.
The Ministry of Health has also issued a statement to express support for TTSH’s action. Media reported that MOH supports TTSH’s decision to terminate My Ngerng’s contract, as his “actions show a lack of integrity and are incompatible with the values and standards of behaviour expected of hospital employees.”
Initially, Ngerng posted on his Facebook page at 4.35pm that he accepted the decision of TTSH. “The stress of the court case has made it difficult for me to concentrate on my job,” he wrote. “And my advocacy on the CPF has also taken a toil on my ability to do my job as well.”
However, he made an additional post at 6.13pm, saying, “These past few weeks, I have been under immense pressure at work. However, I have also contributed immensely at work. I had wanted to give my employers the benefit of the doubt, but the truth of the matter is that the sacking was politically motivated.”
When asked why he he felt his dismissal was politically motivated, Ngerng referred TOC to the original statement by MOH, and said that he felt it was so after much consideration and thoughts over the issue.
When interviewed by The Independent Singapore, Ngerng also said “I was never told at my workplace that they had an issue with my impending lawsuit. Three weeks ago, when they gave me a formal warning letter, I understood that they had issues with me using my work time for personal activities.”
“When I got my termination notice, to my understanding, it was because I had used my work time to manage my activism. No colleague or supervisor said anything about my lawsuit.” TTSH’s media release, however, also included his defamation case as an issue.
Are there grounds for believing that his dismissal was politically motivated?
The following is an estimated sequence of events, in tracking TTSH’s actions leading up to Ngerng’s dismissal:

  • About 3.30pm – Ngerng was informed by TTSH of his dismissal.
  • 3.30pm onwards – TTSH and MOH issued media statements, Roy contacted his lawyer and friends.
  • 4.28pm – The first public and third party report of his dismissal was made by Five Stars and a Moon (FSAAM), with extensive information on political leaders and public figures who were not fired in spite of their participation in politics.
  • 4.32pm – Report by FSAAM was republished in Hardware Zone forum.
  • 4.35pm – Ngerng posted the first update of his dismissal on his Facebook page while packing his things at work.
  • 4.50pm onwards – Mainstream media began coverage of the dismissal in their online channels.
  • 5.23pm – Ngerng was shown the media release issued by TTSH, not by his employers but through a media contact who asked him about the dismissal.
  • 6.13pm: Ngerng posted on his Facebook page that the dismissal was politically motivated.

From a public communications perspective, the actions by TTSH seemed odd. The sequence of events indicated that FSAAM was given an exclusive for the announcement – a point that was also identified by Mothership.sg. FSAAM also managed to put together an extensive report, using examples of known public figures, to present the case that Ngerng was justifiably dismissed.
The need for an exclusive announcement is debatable, but even more strange that it was issued to a website that has a relatively small footprint in Singapore – Alexa ranks FSAAM’s position at about 4,600 in Singapore. Why would TTSH choose to send a media release to them if its interest was for broader coverage of its announcement?
In fact, FSAAM did not cite the media statement by TTSH directly in any way. Rather, it added that Ngerng’s “activities at Hong Lim Park have raised a few eyebrows in this area”, a point that was not covered in TTSH’s media statement. As such, did it receive the media release by TTSH, as an “exclusive” or otherwise, or from another source?
TOC sent questions to TTSH and FSAAM on this matter today morning before 8.30am. At time of publishing, which we note is hours more than FSAAM’s reaction time to TTSH’s media release, neither have replied. We will publish their replies here once we receive them.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Masagos Zulkifli urges Singaporeans to play their part amid Circuit Breaker, or else 28 days may not be enough

Ten days into the Circuit Breaker, about 50 people were still caught…

胆敢冒充总理夫人名义行骗? 何晶吁民众勿上当

骗子冒充总理夫人何晶名义对公众进行诈骗,何晶发文澄清并无此事,呼吁公众勿上当。 近日一则 “虚拟货币交易计划”的假新闻报导称,华侨银行拨电何晶,要求她不要在采访中透露赚钱的秘诀,还说何晶吁请新加坡每个人“在大银行屏蔽它之前,万勿错过这个惊人的机会”,同时还在报道中出现多家本地媒体的标志,试图以假乱真。 据悉,这些文章均为脸书上的假广告,尽管脸书已试图在删除这些广告,但仍然流传了好几个月,8月份时这些广告更是开始冒用何晶的名义,并以类似新闻标题“何晶最新投资连专家与大银行都畏惧了”,不断在网上流传。 昨日(26日)何晶于脸书上发文澄清该假新闻伪装来自《海峡时报》、《亚洲新闻台》等正规媒体的标志行骗,并以她的名义让民众误会她也参与投资,但事实上她并没有。 她指出,文章内容称以比特币等投机的方式,并假装有漏洞,让受害者的钱迅速倍增,同时使用她的旧照片和新照片来增加民众的信任。 最后,何晶呼吁民众勿上当,若有看到相关假报道,应该向脸书、Whatsapp举报,也不要相信任何能够投资致富的手段。 类似手段已不新鲜,而且众多知名人士都成为目标。日前,我国总理李显龙就被骗徒的冒用名义,售卖比特币给民众,呼吁民众购买。此外,包括本地众多政治人物等人也曾被骗徒冒用名义,经常以“快速致富”的广告吸引眼球,要求登记姓名、电邮以及信用卡资料。

Constructive disharmony

Room for improvement for inter-faith dialogue in Singapore. Terence Lee.