Business
WP’s Leon Perera proposes ways for Gov’t to support start-ups and SMEs in post-COVID world
While delivering a speech to address the Supplementary Budget in Parliament on Tuesday (27 July), The Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Aljunied GRC Leon Perera offered several suggestions on how the Government can help small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) thrive in a post-COVID world.
Mr Perera said many SMEs, particularly micro-businesses and small and medium-sized enterprises, have been badly affected economically following the last few rounds of restrictions, adding that SMEs employ about “two thirds” of Singapore’s workforce.
He also pointed out that COVID-19 has worsened inequality among companies where those who are able to adapt to the digital economy and e-commerce have fared better compared to those who didn’t.
Despite the challenges faced in this pandemic year, there has been a “burst of new start-up formation” in many countries around the globe, including Singapore, he said.
Although 2020 is deemed as the worst recession experienced in Singapore’s history, there were 63,480 new enterprises set up in that year compared to 61,573 in 2019. In fact, the figure in 2020 is the highest since 2016.
“We should ensure that we create the right eco-system to enable these new start-ups, and SMEs in general, to flourish and both safeguard jobs in a competitive environment as well as contribute to job and GDP growth, alongside MNCs and state-linked companies,” the MP said.
However, Mr Perera expressed in his speech that wholesalers, distributors and importers who support restaurants and F&B outlets are not included in the Government’s Jobs Support Scheme (JSS), noting that the Government should take a “balanced approach in administering schemes”.
He also asserted that there should be review on the rental support given to SME tenants who rent a mixed-used property, such as a shophouse for both retail and residential use.
“Due to Covid-19, there are SME tenants who have to resort to renting a mixed-use property to keep their businesses afloat. However, doing so would prevent them from obtaining the cash disbursements automatically.
“Some SME owners who are renting mixed-use properties find the process complicated to manage, sometimes due to language differences or unfamiliarity with government applications. They have also raised their concerns about how costly it would be for them to get hired-help just to assist them to submit their claim with supporting documents,” he explained, adding that the Government should look into having an automatic service for SME tenants renting mixed-use properties to reduce their financial burden.
Call for one-stop portal for all citizens and companies
In his speech, Mr Perera has noted that the Government should improve the user experience for its grant applications for SMEs.
As such, he urged for the creation of a one-stop portal for all citizens and companies to transact with the Government on assistance schemes.
Although there is one such portal that exists now – businessgrants.gov.sg – but it appears that not all the SME schemes across the whole of Government can be accessed via this portal, said the MP of Aljunied GRC.
He also said that many SMEs feel that the process of applying for grants and support is “too administratively time-consuming and difficult”.
In fact, UOB SME Outlook 2021 survey revealed that small SMEs want more help in applying for existing grants and schemes, and this was one of their top three wishes for Budget 2021, he said.
Ways to support SMEs in post-COVID world
Mr Perera proposed that the first way to help SMEs is to offer more SME scholarships to the people of Singapore, as well as develop and market it well so it becomes attractive to them.
He explained that SMEs are not sufficiently attracting, retaining, developing and investing in their talent and this is a “vicious cycle” as they will not be able to offer quality goods and services, as well as survive for a long run.
“SMEs without talent do not do well and not doing well means they are discouraged from investing in their talent.”
Although there are Government scholarships in place, such as some IMDA scholarships, that will allow scholars to take on roles in SMEs rather than in GLCs and other major companies, but he questioned if the Government is putting enough effort into developing the scholarships.
“It could well be that SMEs scholarships are not as attractive to many young Singaporeans as other types of scholarships, such as PSC scholarships or GLC scholarships. To widen the potential talent pool for such SME scholarships, can we give the option to PSC scholars to transfer the second part of their bond to an SME? This may attract some PSC scholars who realise that they would rather develop their career in the private sector,” he said.
The next suggestion by Mr Perera is for the Government to nurture players that will provide shared services like finance, HR, accounting and administration at low costs to SMEs. This is because most SMEs find it hard to employ individuals in such sectors due to lack of qualified workers as well as high competition from MNCs, GLCs and professional firms.
“And having such firms providing such services at low prices on an on-going basis would be more helpful to SMEs than many of our existing schemes which prioritise the partial funding of one-off consulting work.
“Our economic agencies should treat the development of the low-cost shared service industry as an industry development priority. Technology can be leveraged to provide low-cost services,” he said.
The third suggestion by Mr Perera is for the Government to help SMEs have better succession planning as many of them find it a struggle to ensure the continuity of their business and to monetise the value they’ve created.
“Would the government look into providing low-cost services to SMEs that cannot engage M&A advisory firms, to help match them to potential acquirers? A basic form of match-making could be set up via an online portal which allows potential buyers and sellers of small firms to express their interest, for example,” he proposed, noting that other first-world countries offer SME owners strategic advice on business succession planning.
The MP for Aljunied also urged the Government to look at SMEs that are starting overseas, and asked if Enterprise SG is able to provide hotdesking facilities and business centres in its key overseas centres to help SMEs that are going abroad for the first time.
“While such facilities are available commercially in most global cities, having Singapore SMEs use the same facility and having that co-located with the office of Enterprise Singapore and other Singapore government agencies in-country would facilitate networking with government and collaborations among Singapore firms in that overseas market.
“Subsidised rental rates could also be provided to ease market entry. Access to such facilities should, of course, be limited to SMEs and not extended to large firms,” he said.
Financing growth for SMEs
In his speech, Mr Perera also pointed out that having an Export and Import (EXIM) bank for SMEs is something the Government should consider having.
He said that in 2010, the Economic Strategies Committee (ESC) mooted the option of having an EXIM bank but the Government said that the gaps in trade financing could be addressed by expanding the suite of trade and internationalisation finance schemes under what was then International Enterprise (IE) Singapore, without the setting up of an EXIM bank.
Ever since then, Enterprise Singapore has launched many internationalisation finance schemes in which the Government co-shares risks with participating financial institutions to support SMEs.
“However, I am not sure if all our SMEs feel that it is easy to secure financing, especially for overseas expansion. It should be noted that even with the government sharing a high proportion of the risk, banks may prefer other options to deploy their capital then lending to SMEs, as they still bear some risk,” he said.
He continued, “While existing financing schemes have certainly helped some of our SMEs, it would be worth considering if the creation of an EXIM bank for SMEs could help us to reach greater outcomes in SME growth.”
“Having an institution that has the sole mandate to lend to and boost our SMEs, rather than relying on schemes driven by commercial banks who will, understandably, pursue primarily commercial priorities, can help us better address SME’s financing needs. Hence, I believe the establishment of an EXIM bank for SMEs is an idea worth revisiting.”
Lastly, Mr Perera noted that it is critical to protect the intellectual property of SMEs in order to foster innovation in the SME sector.
This is because there are still a perception in the sector that for IP-dependent kinds of work like creative or consulting work, government agencies may take their ideas contained in their proposals and pass it to cheaper vendors or adopt those ideas internally.
As such, the MP asked: “I would like to ask if all government agencies are given strict guidelines to not treat ideas contained in proposals in this manner?”
Having said that, Mr Perera told the House that the pandemic provides the best opportunity for Singapore to leverage on the increase of start-ups in the country by creating an eco-system that allows these companies to thrice and scale-up by driving job creation and creating a third engine of value creation that may be more rooted in Singapore than perhaps all MNCs are.
Business
Temasek in negotiations for over US$1 billion stake in India’s largest snack maker
Temasek Holdings is in talks to acquire a minority stake in Haldiram Snacks, India’s largest snack manufacturer. This potential transaction could value Haldiram at around US$11 billion (S$14.3 billion). Temasek is considering buying 10% to 15%, with an investment worth over US$1 billion (S$1.3 billion), possibly paving the way for an IPO.
SINGAPORE: Temasek Holdings is reportedly in discussions to acquire a minority stake in Haldiram Snacks, India’s largest snack manufacturer.
As reported by Bloomberg news, sources familiar with the matter have indicated that the transaction may value Haldiram at approximately US$11 billion (S$14.3 billion).
The Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund is contemplating purchasing between 10 per cent and 15 per cent of the company, which could equate to a stake worth over US$1 billion (S$1.3 billion).
The potential investment could serve as a stepping stone towards an initial public offering (IPO) for Haldiram, though the discussions are still at a preliminary stage and may not culminate in a deal.
The company, also known as Haldiram’s, has attracted interest from various other bidders, underscoring its significant market position.
A representative for Temasek has declined to provide any comments, and Haldiram has not responded immediately to requests for information.
Established by Ganga Bishan Agarwal in the 1930s in northern India, Haldiram’s offers an extensive range of products, including sweet and savoury snacks, frozen meals, and breads.
The company also operates 43 restaurants in and around Delhi, as detailed on its website.
The Agarwal family is reportedly considering various options, including a potential sale of the business or an IPO, as noted by Bloomberg News.
The growing interest of global investors in India has been fuelled by the nation’s rapid economic expansion, making it a prime location for significant deal-making.
Over the past two decades, Temasek has invested nearly US$37 billion in India, according to Mr Vishesh Shrivastav, the managing director for India investments at Temasek.
In July, Mohit Bhandari, Temasek’s Managing Director for India, during an interview with Reuters, indicated that Temasek Holdings plans to invest up to US$10 billion (approximately S$13.4 billion) in India over the next three years, with targeted investment areas including financial services and healthcare.
As Temasek becomes more cautious about investing in China, it is leaning towards increasing its investments in India.
India’s economy is growing rapidly, with its stock market near historical highs, and there is a boom in initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions.
Bhandari stated that India currently accounts for 7% of Temasek’s global investments, and the company intends to increase this proportion.
Approximately 22% of Temasek’s investments are in the US, while 19% are in China. In the last fiscal year, for the first time in a decade, Temasek’s investments in the Americas surpassed those in China.
Temasek has been focusing on acquiring minority stakes in companies, assisting them in their growth, while largely avoiding the trend of securing majority holdings in Indian firms.
Its primary areas of interest include digitisation, consumer trends, and sustainable living.
Notable potential minority investments are said to include VFS Global, which is valued at about US$7 billion, including debt, according to Bloomberg News.
Business
WP Engine banned from WordPress.org amid escalating legal fight with Matt Mullenweg
Following Matt Mullenweg’s ban on WP Engine from accessing WordPress.org resources, many WP Engine customers are left vulnerable, as they can no longer access plugin updates or security features. Mullenweg urged users to seek alternative hosts, escalating the legal conflict between the two companies.
In a sharp escalation of tensions, WordPress co-founder and CEO Matt Mullenweg has publicly criticized WP Engine, a popular hosting provider, while also cutting its access to WordPress.org’s resources.
The dispute centres on legal and trademark issues, with Mullenweg accusing WP Engine of both profiteering off WordPress’s open-source platform and damaging its community.
On 25 September, Mullenweg posted a scathing blog on WordPress.org, stating that WP Engine no longer has free access to the platform’s resources and calling for customers to avoid the service.
He also detailed that WP Engine’s recent actions disrupted thousands of websites. “WP Engine broke thousands of customer sites yesterday in their haphazard attempt to block our attempts to inform the wider WordPress community,” Mullenweg claimed.
The conflict appears rooted in WP Engine’s use of WordPress’s open-source platform while allegedly not contributing to its development or upholding community standards.
At the core of the dispute is WP Engine’s practice of locking down a WordPress feature that tracks revision history for posts. According to Mullenweg, this undermines a crucial aspect of WordPress’s promise of data transparency and protection.
WP Engine, in turn, has argued that Mullenweg is trying to coerce them into paying millions to license the WordPress trademark, a claim Mullenweg denies.
The host provider WP Engine has faced harsh criticism for disabling certain features in WordPress core, which, according to Mullenweg, is central to protecting user data.
“WP Engine wants to control your WordPress experience,” Mullenweg wrote, accusing the company of exploiting WordPress’s free services while making billions of dollars in revenue.
WP Engine’s inability to provide security updates and other resources leaves customers vulnerable, Mullenweg suggested, urging users to consider alternative hosting options.
Additionally, Mullenweg argued that WP Engine would need to replicate WordPress’s security infrastructure independently.
He emphasized that WordPress.org has collaborated with hosting providers to address vulnerabilities at the network layer, a service WP Engine can no longer access freely. “Why should WordPress.org provide these services to WP Engine for free, given their attacks on us?” he asked.
The ban leaves WP Engine in a precarious position, as customers who rely on WordPress plugins and themes may face significant difficulties accessing the latest updates.
These restrictions have raised alarms in the community, as outdated plugins are often the target of cyberattacks. Hackers frequently exploit vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins, potentially compromising millions of websites globally.
The dispute between WordPress and WP Engine has been simmering for some time.
Earlier in September, Mullenweg described WP Engine as a “cancer to WordPress” during a speech at the WordCamp US Summit, accusing the company of profiting off the platform without giving back.
In response, WP Engine sent a cease-and-desist letter to Mullenweg and Automattic, claiming that Mullenweg’s comments were an attempt to extort the company into paying for a trademark license.
WP Engine’s legal team also accused Mullenweg of threatening a “scorched earth nuclear approach” if they refused to comply with his demands.
The cease-and-desist letter was swiftly countered by Automattic, WordPress’s parent company, which asserted that WP Engine had violated WordPress and WooCommerce trademark policies.
The updated trademark policy on WordPress.org explicitly cautions users against assuming WP Engine is affiliated with WordPress. “Many people think WP Engine is ‘WordPress Engine’ and officially associated with WordPress, which it’s not,” the updated guidelines explain.
The legal dispute has thrown both companies and their customers into uncertainty.
While WordPress operates under a GPL (General Public License), which makes the software free for use, hosting providers like WP Engine must offer services beyond the core platform, such as user login systems, update servers, and security monitoring.
Mullenweg’s decision to sever WP Engine’s access to WordPress.org resources has already caused disruption, with many sites reporting functionality issues and concerns about security vulnerabilities.
WP Engine has pushed back against Mullenweg’s actions.
In a public statement, the company accused Mullenweg of abusing his influence over WordPress to disrupt WP Engine customers’ access to WordPress.org, calling the move “unprecedented and unwarranted.”
The company argued that the ban affected not only its users but also developers who rely on WP Engine’s tools to build and maintain WordPress plugins.
As the dispute unfolds, the wider WordPress community is left to grapple with the implications. Developers and hosting providers have expressed concern over the trademark battle, fearing that similar restrictions could extend to them.
The WordPress Foundation, which holds the trademark, has already filed to trademark “Managed WordPress” and “Hosted WordPress,” sparking debate about how this might affect commercial users.
For now, the WordPress ecosystem is in flux as users, developers, and hosting providers wait to see how the legal battle will unfold and whether WP Engine will regain access to critical WordPress.org resources.
Until then, Mullenweg’s message is clear: if you want the true WordPress experience, WP Engine is no longer the place to find it.
Editor’s note: This publication was previously hosted on WP Engine.
-
Comments1 week ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments4 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Current Affairs2 weeks ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore1 week ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore6 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore6 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore1 week ago
Major breakdown on East-West Line: SMRT faces third service disruption in a month