A GrabFood delivery rider cycling across the road in Tampines

A member of the public, Mok Yew Kee, wrote to Straits Times Forum which was published today (24 Mar) showing his concerns for the food delivery riders.

“A food delivery rider is not an employee of the service provider (which may be GrabFood, Foodpanda or Deliveroo); he is an independent worker who does not get any employment benefits such as employer contributions to his Central Provident Fund (CPF) account, medical leave and paid annual leave,” Mr Mok noted.

“No work means no pay for him.”

He wonders if the riders would still be able to do the same number of deliveries and earn the same amount of money when they get older or when they are not as physically fit.

“With no compulsory CPF contributions, do they have adequate savings for old age?” Mr Mok asked.

“It seems that more Singaporeans in their 20s or 30s are becoming food delivery riders. Is this a trend that Singapore should be concerned about when its local manpower is a scarce resource?”

Drivers took Uber to court in UK

Indeed, riders do not get any CPF since they are not considered to be full-time staff. It would be difficult for them to retire without any CPF when they get old.

In Singapore, it has been reported that some 400,000 Singaporeans between age 55 to 70 currently don’t have enough in CPF to meet the Basic Retirement Sum.

People without adequate money for retirement will need to work till they literally drop dead. The alternative of course, would be to sue their children if the children don’t give allowance to their parents in order to subsist.

Meanwhile, UK Supreme Court ruled last month (Feb) that Uber drivers would now be considered workers employed by the firm rather than self-employed contractors.

Following the Court decision, Uber in UK announced last Tue (16 Mar) that 70,000 of its drivers will be paid the minimum wage, get a pension and receive holiday pay.

It’s not known if the riders in Singapore would likewise take the food service providers here to court in order for the service providers to consider them to be full-time employees too with CPF.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Grassroots leader who constructed illegal floor sponsors production costs of MP’s book

It was recently reported in the media that a company belonging to…

【选举】举办网上竞选活动 资媒局:候选人无需提交讲稿

新加坡前进党组织秘书蔡德龙日前才表示对网上竞选表示担忧,因需要提前48小时将讲稿提交给资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),然而该局指出,候选人无需提供演讲稿。 蔡德龙在前日(27日)指出,资媒局已经为政党们举办讲解会,解释网上竞选广播的程序和条规。 他指出,基于本届大选无法像以往的选举般举行大型竞选活动,候选人只能进行网上竞选和演讲。而根据资媒局的讲解,候选人必须准备多份演讲稿,并且于演讲前48小时内将呈交给该局和新传媒工作室。 他对此表示不安,担心演讲稿内容会泄露,而且时间仓促,有可能影响竞选表现。“我们身为反对党,无法监督整个过程。我们只是担心所有的东西都会曝光,让人家知道我们的演讲内容。” 对此,资媒局昨日(6月28日)在政府网站Factually发文告指出,各政党的候选人在网上竞选活动上,无需呈交演讲稿给当局。 惟,该局提醒道,若需要录制在电视播出的竞选广播,该党候选人就需要向新传媒提交演讲稿,避免具诽谤性或敏感话题的内容。

预防国外诈骗电话 下月起本地电话号码不显示‘+’号

下月中开始,本地电话号码前不会再出现‘+’号。 通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立在国会上,进行部门预算辩论时指出,删除本地电话号码前的‘+’号,只有海外来电才会出现该符号,主要是方便国人进行辨识,同时预防外国的诈骗电话。 他指出,资讯通信媒体发展局和电信公司合作,一起展开遏止诈骗电话行动,甚至封锁类似999和995的国际电话。 当局也会和利益相关者合作,就此目标拟定长远措施。 他表示,该部门也会加紧和负责打击诈骗案件的跨部门委员会相关机构的合作及联系,确保遏止行动的应对能力得以加强。 另一方面,政府希望能够在今年内展开《个人资料保护法令》的修订工作。 他表示,该部门计划修订的部分,包括了个人资料保护委员会将被赋予更多执法权,对付未经允许就泄露信息和隐私的机构及个人。

13,000 migrant workers yet to undergo COVID-19 Rostered Routine Testing, netizens think MOM should be responsible for the delay

As three more migrant workers’ dormitories were being identified as new COVID-19…