A GrabFood delivery rider cycling across the road in Tampines

A member of the public, Mok Yew Kee, wrote to Straits Times Forum which was published today (24 Mar) showing his concerns for the food delivery riders.

“A food delivery rider is not an employee of the service provider (which may be GrabFood, Foodpanda or Deliveroo); he is an independent worker who does not get any employment benefits such as employer contributions to his Central Provident Fund (CPF) account, medical leave and paid annual leave,” Mr Mok noted.

“No work means no pay for him.”

He wonders if the riders would still be able to do the same number of deliveries and earn the same amount of money when they get older or when they are not as physically fit.

“With no compulsory CPF contributions, do they have adequate savings for old age?” Mr Mok asked.

“It seems that more Singaporeans in their 20s or 30s are becoming food delivery riders. Is this a trend that Singapore should be concerned about when its local manpower is a scarce resource?”

Drivers took Uber to court in UK

Indeed, riders do not get any CPF since they are not considered to be full-time staff. It would be difficult for them to retire without any CPF when they get old.

In Singapore, it has been reported that some 400,000 Singaporeans between age 55 to 70 currently don’t have enough in CPF to meet the Basic Retirement Sum.

People without adequate money for retirement will need to work till they literally drop dead. The alternative of course, would be to sue their children if the children don’t give allowance to their parents in order to subsist.

Meanwhile, UK Supreme Court ruled last month (Feb) that Uber drivers would now be considered workers employed by the firm rather than self-employed contractors.

Following the Court decision, Uber in UK announced last Tue (16 Mar) that 70,000 of its drivers will be paid the minimum wage, get a pension and receive holiday pay.

It’s not known if the riders in Singapore would likewise take the food service providers here to court in order for the service providers to consider them to be full-time employees too with CPF.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

忧传绯闻隐瞒曾与男人会面 确诊妇遭判监五个月

今年3月初,裕廊SAFRA歌唱班团拜晚宴一度成为最大冠病19感染群,该感染群其中一名确诊女病患,被指担心遭误会有外遇,而隐瞒曾会见一名男子。这名妇女也为此换来五个月的监禁。 名为欧美香(译音)的65岁妇女,因妨碍卫生部官员工作而被判入狱五个月,她还面对两项阻碍医护人员和怂恿男子隐瞒信息的控状,将被纳入考量。 去年2月17日,欧美香曾前往就诊,21日出现发烧症状,但还未马上看医生,隔日还为丈夫庆祝生日。24日她再次求诊,并被列为可疑病例,两日后确诊。医护人员在26日向她了解,在2月3日至17日期间,曾参与的活动和接触哪些人。欧氏则告知除了独自去买菜之外,都留在家里。 至少两位卫生部官员向她索取资料,也已强调必须提供所有细节,但欧美香仅进一步告知2月7日曾到过神庙,就未再透露更多详情。 不过,官员再追踪另一病例近接触者时,却发现这名病患,竟在2月15日,曾在裕廊战备军协俱乐部的美满楼餐馆,以及一个卡拉OK活动上,和欧美香会面。 卫生部展开调查,发现她在2月4日到20日之间,曾频密接触一名72岁男子林强洪(译音)。林强洪此后于3月20日也被确诊,但欧美香却拨电叮嘱他,不要透露两人曾见过面。 3月8日,调查人员向欧美香录口供,但后者仍不愿承认曾见过上述男子;但隔日才坦言,若丈夫出外打球、自己不需煮饭等,才会约该男子见面,也指刻意隐瞒是避免让家人误会和传出绯闻。 对此,法官指出尽管能理解被告隐瞒实情的动机,但相比管控疫情和群众利益,就显得自私了。 法庭需发出明确信息:任何隐瞒资料以致于可能误导追踪调查人员的行为,是不能被接受的。

Singapore custom arrested duo allegedly dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes

Singapore Customs (SC) issued a press release which announced the arresting of…