There is much to ask of the people in charge of charting the future of football in Singapore when it comes to the Football Association of Singapore (FAS) target of the national team qualifying for the World Cup in 2034—a target dubbed GOAL 2034.

This was said by former sports correspondent for TODAY, Jose Raymond on Sunday (21 February) when he addressed the country’s goal to qualify for the biggest international sporting event in football in a Facebook post.

The former politician from Singapore People’s Party recounted roughly two decades of Singapore football history, starting with the remark by former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong in 1998 who said, “Maybe if we change our immigration criteria to bring in top football talent and make them citizens, then one day we too can get into the (World Cup) finals.”

Mr Raymond went on to recount the journey of the Singapore national football team, known as The Lions, over the years including how the team has yet to secure gold at smaller events such as the Southeast Asian Games (SEA Games).

Mr Raymond noted, “Latching on to how France had lifted the World Cup in 1998 through a team made up of immigrants and sons of immigrants, Singapore’s Number 1 [PM Goh] then made a case which then gave birth to Goal 2010, Singapore at the World Cup project.

“It was also a way for the Government to have Singaporeans embrace foreigners in our midst, and for them to help us win football’s greatest prize.”

However, this lofty goal would end up being a bitter disappointment as The Lions failed to secure medals in the SEA Games, or make it to the semi-finals of the regional Tiger Cup tournaments after winning in 1998, let alone qualify for the World Cup.

Around 2004 after the national team saw a change in management and the change of FAS presidents, “The Goal 2010 project was dropped like a tonne of bricks,” wrote Mr Raymond.

In place of that, however, the FAS then came up with a ‘Roadmap’ for Singapore football, which included goals of becoming the top ranked football nation in ASEAN, among the top 10 in Asia and qualify for the Asian Cup by 2009.

While there were some bright spots—such as winning the ASEAN championship twice in 2004/2005 and again in 2007—the Lions did not make it to the Asian Cup nor ranked in the top 10 in Asia.

Though the team, under Serbian manager Radojo Avramovic, did make it to the third round of the 2010 World Cup Qualifiers, it still did not win the gold at the SEA Games. PM Goh’s vision was still close but unattainable.

After Avramovic left, the team was led by Bernd Stange and technical director Michel Sablon.

However, as Mr Raymond described, “Both left with nothing much to show except for the fact that Singapore football had sunken far deeper into the football abyss, despite Sablon having proclaimed in 2015 that Singapore would be like Japan by 2020.”

Not only did the national team not perform well on the international stage, the youth team—dubbed the Young Lions—“get smashed regularly at regional competitions as well”, said Mr Raymond.

“So when the people in charge suddenly put together a project, which apparently is aiming for Singapore to qualify for the World Cup in 2034, don’t mind us for showing little belief or faith that the vision will materialise into anything but heartache and worse, a waste of financial resources,” he chided.

What does the data say about the status of local football?

Mr Raymond goes on to ask about the state of local football in Singapore, including hard data on how many people follow the sport. He noted that Sports Singapore data shows that running, swimming, and cycling all rank higher on the Sports Participating Index as compared to football.

He asked, “Does Singapore football still command the same feverish following as it did in the past?”

Mr Raymond suggested commissioning a study to elicit responses from a wide spectrum of society.

Beyond just spectator interest, he also asked about the level of resources and effort put into encouraging football at the school levels.

“How many schools in Singapore offer football as a sport?  What happened to the School Football Academies project which was announced by the FAS in 2017?” he wrote.

“Do parents believe that their children will have a decent future in football as a career in Singapore and what will it take to have them do so?”

On this note, Mr Raymond also suggested that a study be conducted among parents who have children involved local football and those who don’t to find out their thoughts on the matter.

At the FAS level, Mr Raymond asked if the Association has done enough on its own to “gather corporate support, build on the sport in Singapore over the last 20 years?”

He also asked, “How has the current management team fared based on its own manifesto released during the 2017 elections for office bearers? What has been current technical director Joseph Palatsides’ contribution to Singapore’s football since arriving in May 2019 and what has he done to awake Singapore, the “sleeping football giant?”

Mr Raymond added, “Has the FAS explained what led to the failure of Goal 2010, the subsequent Roadmap, the national ambition to win the SEA Games gold in 2015 in Singapore and its current state of performance malaise?”

On top of that, Mr Raymond also raised questions in terms of government investment in the sport, asking “Is football worthy of the taxpayers’ contributions?”

He called on the government to reveal how much the GOAL 2034 project would cost taxpayers and also investing more in and developing other sports that Singapore might excel in instead of football.

This is a sentiment voiced by many netizens when Culture, Community, and Youth Minister Edwin Tong spoke on Singapore’s effort to qualify for the 2034 World Cup. Back in 2019 when Mr Tong was the vice president of the Football Association of Singapore (FAS), he had revealed the ambitious plan to qualify for the biggest international football event.

Should the State remain steadfast in its goal to qualify for the 2034 World Cup, Mr Raymond asked who would lead such a project which involves multiple ministries— Ministry of Education, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Home Affairs while being led by the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth.

Mr Raymond concluded that while Singapore may have the interest to channel into achieving such a goal, it might not have the wealth or even the size.

Though he did concede that much smaller nations have made it to the World Cup including Uruguay with 3.4 million population, Trinidad and Tobago  with 1.4 million, Northern Ireland with 1.9 million and Iceland with only 356,000.

Still, Mr Raymond warned; “While it is fortuitous that Singapore now has people like billionaire Forrest Li of Sea Group and Shopee fame who is willing to pour his money into helping steer local football, Forrest Li alone is not a sustainable solution to the failed society-driven Singapore Premier League club model, where some clubs are still known to pay players peanuts as former international Faritz Hameed recently highlighted in a podcast.”

He concluded, “There are lots of emotional and sentimental reasons to support football, but let’s look at data, logic, facts and the track record and history of the sport instead.”

“Because as of today, Singapore has not won the SEA Games football gold medal despite having tried since 1959.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

GE 2011: Some GRCs may go uncontested

TOC has confirmed that not all Group Representation Constituencies (GRC) may be…

谴责听证会审问异议者 加国学者声援覃炳鑫

再有国际学者跨海声援本地历史学者覃炳鑫博士,谴责新加坡国会“应对网络蓄意假消息”特选委员会,恶意打压覃博士针对新国历史的异议,严重侵害和不尊重学术自由,有必要向后者作出公开道歉。 加拿大大学讲师协会(CAUT)认可覃炳鑫博士的历史学者身份,专研上世纪5、60年代新加坡独立斗争史实。该协会以执行总监大卫罗宾逊名义,致函上述特委会主席暨新加坡国会副议长张有福,作出严正抗议。 该协会控诉,在今年3月由国会特选委员会召开的“应对网络蓄意假消息”的公开听证会,覃炳鑫遭六个小时的恶意盘问,已偏离原本要讨论的陈情书内容,实则藉此驳斥覃的历史观点和对政府的批评。 “覃炳鑫的研究已经受过同行的评议,但是在质询过程,特委会意图透过断章取义的方式,质疑覃炳鑫的历史观点。特选委员会的质询侵害了覃炳鑫的学术自由,以及在免于被当权者报复下发表其研究的权益。” 捍卫学者发表学术观点 拥有70万教职员会员的加拿大讲师协会称,该会致力捍卫学术自由,学者们传授、学习、研究和出版他们的研究或思想,应免于受任何体制或教条的规范、报复或歧视。 “覃博士受到的对待,彰显了新加坡当权者对待学界的态度,也威压国内其他学者行使他们的学术自由。” 为研究应对网路上蓄意散播的假消息,新加坡政府从2018年3月14日至29日,国会特选委员会召开公开听证会,广纳谏言,收集公民组织意见。在最后一天,却上演成律法部长沙姆甘针对覃炳鑫的审问。 然而,覃炳鑫提到1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起律法部长善姆甘等人围剿。 针对上世纪50、60年代期间,新加坡是否有共产主义阴谋散布?左翼份子是否受马共唆使企图进行不利新加坡的政治活动,才有必要进行逮捕行动,覃炳鑫和善姆甘展开六小时的审问拉锯战。 质疑覃炳鑫历史观的理据 在过程中,善姆甘以“是或不是”、“同不同意”、“你有读过这些资料吗?”“对与否”等威权式的提问,无意与覃炳鑫对话,过度简化复杂的历史争议,其背后意图却是要质疑覃炳鑫历史研究的正当性和理据。…

前进党成员支持者响应捐血活动 陈清木吁充实血库拯救生命

本周六(19日),新加坡前进党党员和部分支持者,积极响应捐血活动号召,该党秘书长陈清木医生也到场给予支持和感谢众人善举。 有关捐血活动是该党发起的社区活动之一,获得民间和支持者良好响应,为充实我国血液库存作出贡献。 陈清木医生则在脸书分享,活动当天本身也陪同那些响应捐血号召的党成员及支持者。他指出有好些都是第一次捐血,也很欣慰许多志愿者现身。 “对于许多新加坡人,包括前进党成员响应这号召,我感到骄傲。我们的血库必须有足够库存以随时准备好拯救生命。” 根据卫生科学局官网的资料,单是在新加坡,平均每日每小时就需要用到15包血袋,每年更需要12万血袋,才能满足患者输血需求,相当于每日需400包的血袋量。 而随着人口老龄化、加之救人医疗技术和新医院的设立,每年需要的血袋库存将增加,为了应付不论和平或紧急时期所需,血库必须确保有至少六天的O型血库量。

PM: We spend less on healthcare than other countries but achieve better outcomes

PM Lee officially opened Sengkang Hospital two weeks ago on 23 Mar.…