PM Lee officially opened Sengkang Hospital two weeks ago on 23 Mar. In his opening address, he said Singapore spends less on healthcare than most other developed countries, and yet able to achieve better outcomes than these countries.

“We have needed to spend less partly because our population was younger, and has only recently begun aging. But the main reason is because we have structured our system properly, and built in the right incentives to guard against over-consumption of healthcare services,” he said.

“We have to watch carefully how heavily the Government subsidises healthcare. Not just to save taxpayers’ money, but to avoid encouraging over-treatment by doctors and over-consumption of healthcare services.”

He added that in countries with very high subsidies or free healthcare, people worry less about their healthcare costs, and doctors also correspondingly prescribe more unnecessary and expensive tests and treatments.

Still, he said that Singapore’s healthcare expenditure is rising faster than the GDP. “Eventually, we cannot sustain this,” he said.

“So in the medium term, we have to find new ways to fund this healthcare spending… And we have to make hard choices and I hope we will have the support of Singaporeans when we make them.”

He did not say what sort of “hard choices” his government is going to make to fund future healthcare spending but in Feb this year, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat has already told Parliament that the increase in GST (to 9%) is necessary in light of the needs in healthcare and other areas. It is slated to kick in some time between 2021 and 2025.

Singapore government spends less in healthcare because citizens spend more out from their own pockets

According to data from World Bank, the Singapore government actually subsidises the least among many countries when it comes to healthcare.

For example, among the 7 countries whose hospitals were ranked top 10 by Newsweek magazine recently, Singaporeans incurred the most out-of-pocket expenditure as a percentage of total health expenditure:

Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of total health expenditure)

  1. US 11.1%
  2. Germany 12.5%
  3. Japan 13.1%
  4. Canada 14.6%
  5. Israel 24.4%
  6. Switzerland 28.4%
  7. Singapore 36.7%

The out-of-pocket expenditure (percentage) was even higher than the average of the East Asia & Pacific countries. When the high income countries in this region were taken out leaving only the 3rd world countries in the calculation, Singapore’s out-of-pocket expenditure (percentage) was still higher than theirs:

  • East Asia & Pacific 26.1%
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) 33.5%

In other words, Singaporean patients paid more from their own pockets as percentage of total health expenditure than even other 3rd world countries in East Asia & Pacific region, on the average. This also meant that the Singapore government subsidised the least.

The World Bank defines out-of-pocket expenditures as any direct outlay by households, including gratuities and in-kind payments, to health practitioners and suppliers of pharmaceuticals, therapeutic appliances, and other goods and services the primary intent of which is to contribute to the restoration or enhancement of health status. This definition can include transport costs for accessing healthcare and over-the-counter medicines and supplies, but does not include pre-paid fees for health-related taxes or insurance.

With the threat of paying high medical costs out from own pockets, it’s not surprising that some Singaporeans has even tried to commit suicide from inside a hospital (‘Woman attempted suicide in Changi Hospital, allegedly from her fear of facing possible high medical costs‘).

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为爱蒙蔽双眼? 人协前经理因参与洗钱被判坐牢20个月!

“为爱蒙蔽双眼”?一名人民协会前选区经理,被指陷入爱情骗局,协助“外籍情郎”开设户口接受诈骗案赃款,涉及金额高达43万元。 她在庭上承认触犯贪污、贩毒和严重罪案(没收利益)法令下的三项控状、以及不诚实接受赃物控状,今日被判入狱20个月。 这名女被告(Ng Koon Lay)64岁,尚有16项控状仍待法官斟酌下判。据案情显示,2015年,被告上网结识了两名男子–“美国水手”Greg L Johnson和“瑞士石油交易商”David Bay,两人对被告展开追求。 被告出现财务困难时,向“美国水手”借钱。“美国水手”声称有朋友能借9千元给她,但是转账过程却很诡异,要求被告提供银行账户,接受有关7万1000元款项,再把6万2000元转给另一账户。 银行账户被用来接受赃款 2016年9月,商业事务局还曾警告被告,不要再使用银行账户接收款项,因为被告接收的7万1000元,实则是一笔电邮诈骗案的赃款! 被告随后把与“美国水手”联系的脸书账号,交给了商业事务局。然后转过头来,又设立新账号联系“美国水手”,再向对方借钱,接受了约11万8360新元款项,再把8万9860新元转到另一账户。当然,这笔钱也是诈骗案赃款。…

Osman Sulaiman: Nothing to be thankful about Singapore’s “Malay” president

Khan Osman Sulaiman, a businessman and former Reform Party candidate in the…

高庭驳回迪哥达索取警方录供的刑事动议

本月3日,大法官梅达顺在高庭驳回了本社总编许渊臣,以及被控刑事诽谤男子迪哥达的刑事动议。 检控官拒绝公开两人此案中的警方录供,他们个别针对此事提呈刑事动议。 不过,梅达顺在口头陈述判决依据时表明,提呈在他眼前的凭据,未能说服他要求高庭审核国家法院裁决的最高门槛已达到。 早前,迪哥达辩护律师拉维,依循刑事诉讼法(CPC)第22条文,要求控方在开审前出示迪哥达的口供,但遭国家法院法官驳回。 至于许渊臣辩护律师朱正熙,强调许渊臣此前录的口供,能力助此案,因为当时当局并没有盘问被告,确认他是否有诽谤内阁的意图,以及他是否认为文章陈述是中立或不利的。 梅达顺则认为,辩方大可在上诉时提及此事,惟朱正熙也指出有凸显程序错误的重要;梅达顺也提醒检控官,考量有关口供是否和辩方有关联。 拉维律师则提及,早在开审前,检控官就已知道被告索取有关口供,但当时对方就已拒绝。可是控方仍辩解被告可走刑事案件披露会议(Criminal Case Disclosure Conference,简称CCDC)程序,但依据《刑事诉讼法》第159条文,却需要征得控辩双方同意。 一开始控方就拒绝让被告索取口供,对此拉维更形容控方的上述建议,形同让被告做“徒劳之举”(原文:go on…

The childcare teacher – not your high-class maid (Part 2)

Rachel Zeng looks at the perceived role of childcare teachers in S’pore.