Source: Reuters

A 48-year-old man was fined S$1,000 on Thursday (4 Feb) for destroying a People’s Action Party (PAP) poster during the General Election (GE) last year, in the first prosecution of its kind under the Parliamentary Elections Act.

In an earlier report, it was noted that Lim Song Huat – who works as a part-time security guard – faced three charges of destroying one PAP poster and defacing two more on 3 July 2020.

The court heard that Mr Lim left his residence in Woodlands to buy 4D lottery tickets on the morning of 3 July last year.

On his way home, he passed by the election posters along the service road of Woodlands Street 13.

At 9.53am, Mr Lim picked up a stone from the road and attempted to use it to tear a poster of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong but he failed.

He then tore the poster with his bare hands, causing more than half of it to be removed and defacing the poster. He also drew a horizontal line across another poster and tore a third poster, in charges taken into consideration.

Mr Lim was caught in the act via nearby closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs), and he was subsequently arrested.

The offence was made “out of frustration”

Deputy Public Prosecutor Selene Yap sought the maximum fine of S$1,000, saying that the offences were “incredibly hard to detect” because Mr Lim was only found after “extensive trawling of CCTV footage” near the location where the incident took place.

“As your honour is well aware, election campaigns are highly regulated in Singapore,” said DPP Yap.

“It takes place over a short period of time, and putting up of posters in public places is highly regulated. There is a limit to the amount of posters parties can put up, and the time they can put it up for,” she added.

Mr Lim, who was unrepresented, had pleaded for a lighter sentence. He argued that it was his first offence, which he said was due to “stupidity” and “stress of work”.

“Because of stupidity and [the] influence of my colleague, that’s why I [did] this stupid thing. I sent email to PAP to volunteer work as well… Your honour, if [it’s] possible for lighter sentence, [it] will be appreciated.

“I promise you I very scared already, I won’t do this anymore. I got black record in my future, when employer find out this kind of thing, [they] won’t employ me,” he told the court.

Mr Lim was asked on the frustrations he had at the time, to which he answered: “Because I am pure Singapore citizen, I’m born in Singapore… sometimes, whether it’s elections or non-elections, sometimes the people’s opinion is like – you vote PAP also same. It’s like we don’t have the talented people.”

“Whether [it’s] PAP, Singapore Democratic Party [or] Worker’s Party, we don’t have talented people there. As a member of public, [I am worried] maybe in two or five years’ [time], what will happen to Singapore… [I wanted] to pour out [my] frustration, that’s why,” he added.

Attempted to destroy SDP poster but failed

Mr Lim also revealed that he had intended to destroy a Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) poster, but could not reach it.

“Actually that day we have [SDP] poster, but because [I] couldn’t reach,” he said. “I’m not only against PAP. It’s because of frustration. The voice in my head – my colleague [said] – you want to vote PAP or SDP.”

In sentencing Mr Lim, the judge noted that this was the first prosecution under the Parliamentary Elections Act and the court must send a clear message that damaging, destroying, or defacing election posters is “utterly unacceptable”.

“While a person may hold strong political views, these should be expressed by their vote at the ballot box or by legally sanctioned means.

“Acts of defacement and destruction of political posters set up by any party for the purpose of national elections are not merely unlawful, but are also extreme, divisive, and potentially inflammatory forms of expression, which must be strenuously deterred in our country,” said the judge.

Those convicted of altering, removing, destroying, obliterating, or defacing election posters or banners can be jailed up to a year or fined up to S$1,000, or both.

Subscribe
Notify of
41 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总理脸书发文:重视军训安全 不草率处理过失

我国总理李显龙在脸书发文,强调武装部队非常重视军训安全, 会尽全力让军训达到“零死亡率”的目标。同时也表示,他身为总理必须确保国防部有能干的领导团队。在军训事故发生时,政府必须向遇难者家属交代、向全体国民服役人员和人民交代,政府不会敷衍了事,草率处理任何过失。 他在一小时前,在个人脸书专页上载中英文稿,针对近期发生的军训事故发表声明。 “宝贵的生命就这样结束。我非常清楚失去亲人的悲痛,对父母来说,他们失去最疼爱的儿子。如果事故涉及公众人物,如冯伟衷一等中士,民众的反应就更强烈了,更难以接受他们的离世。” 相信这也是自战备军人冯伟衷意外事故以来,李显龙针对军训安全议题,首次亲自发表的个人声明。 “每一次发生事故后,我们都会关心受伤士兵的伤势,给他们最好的医疗照顾。对于不幸去世的战友,我们感到伤心难过,我们能体会家属失去至亲的悲痛心情,对同袍们来说也失去了出生入死的兄弟。但我们必须强忍悲伤,为他们的家人提供最好的安排,给他们最佳的照顾,并继续执行我们武装部队的使命。” 他强调,武装部队也会一一展开调查,找出事故发生的原因。之后,武装部队一定会加强安全体系和运作程序,确保类似事故不再发生。即便这非常不容易,但仍须全力以赴,因为每个生命都是宝贵的。 他也指出作为前军官,对于保障下属军训安全有深刻体会,很了解需要为自己部下的军训水平、个人安全以及军中福利负责,代替父母照顾他们。 “后来,身为参谋长,每当发生军训事故时,我都要出面处理,纠正过失,决定处分,对整个运作程序作适当的调整,应该改的就去改,应该做的就去做。我有义务向遇难者的家属交代。我必须想尽办法,在士兵履行使命时,保障他们的安全。” “我和武装部队领导都重视军训安全” 他强调自身和武装部队领导,都非常重视军训安全,并认真看待。“非常重视军训安全,他们会认真对待一切事情。” 他说,战时士兵冲锋陷阵,但在和平时的军训就要保障他们安全。…

Former PAP MP appointed as Deputy Attorney-General with effect from 1 March

The President has appointed Mr Hri Kumar Nair S.C. as a Deputy…

水獭相争再起风云! Zouk水獭家族入侵碧山宏茂桥公园失利

水獭家族之战一直是水獭爱好者的热门话题,其争夺之地也经常发生在碧山-宏茂桥公园内,而好几次的“战争”中,都由滨海湾家族胜出,然而此次却出现形势逆转,只能说滨海湾家族险胜。 有水獭爱好者Jeff Tan近日发现,Zouk家族最近在碧山-宏茂桥公园出没,这也踏出了它们平时的“领地”。 网友于本月10日首次在公园发现了七只Zouk家族的水獭。当天他们并没有与“公园常胜军”,滨海湾家族正面冲突,但也已经开始发起“进攻”,偷偷潜入滨海湾家族的领土。 在隔了两日后,于5月12日早上,网友在公园内听见尖叫声,尖叫声则来自于滨海湾家族,相信是因为感觉到“敌军”渐渐靠近。它们也蓄势待发,在公园内游走,最终由10只滨海湾水獭发现了侵入领土的Zouk家族。 随后,“大战”也一触即发,滨海湾水獭先是叫嚣试图吓退对方,但似乎对Zouk家族无法起到任何威吓作用,随即进入“决战”状态。 经过短暂的争吵后,两大家族来个中场休息,并慎用休息时间,叫了更多的家族水獭回头帮忙。最终滨海湾家族还是将Zouk家族赶走,再回到水中。 根据网友指出,所幸此次战斗未出现任何伤亡。

French political campaign blocked by Twitter in compliance with the country’s fake news law

A government voter registration campaign from the French government has been rejected…