Following several recent sexual misconduct cases involving faculty members and a review on the processes in handling such cases, the National University of Singapore (NUS) said it is taking further steps.

In an email to students, staff and alumni on Thursday (17 December), NUS President Tan ENg Chye outlines these measures that will be implemented by the institution in the coming months in order to further tighten its processes in handling sexual misconduct cases. This including training for staff and bystanders on spotting sexual misconduct and taking the appropriate action in those situations.

The circular noted plans to develop a policy which would apply to both staff and students, and provide the NUS community with a report every six months regarding sexual misconduct cases involving students and/or staff.

However, it added that facts of these cases, if any, will be redacted in order to protect the identity of victims.

Another measure is the introduction of a refresher course on respect and consent for staff and students as well as workshops to “build an inclusive and respectful culture on campus” and train staff who are likely to be first responders in such cases.

Professor Tan said in the circular that the Victim Care Unit—which was set up to support student victims of sexual misconduct—will be rechristened the NUS Care Unit. The Unit will also be given resources to support NUS staff in the matter by the second quarter of 2021.

The President added that the University has also tightened its internal processes to make sure that the reporting of arrestable offences is done within two weeks after the Board of Discipline or Committee of Inquiry concludes its investigations.

If the circumstances call for it, a police report may be filed, as stipulated in Section 424 of the Criminal Procedure Code which compels NUS to report arrestable offences such as voyeurism, outrage of modesty and rape.

Beyond that, Prof Tan acknowledged that more openness and transparency in dealing with sexual misconduct cases is critical in order to build trust and a culture of respect on the NUS campus, adding that the University will continue to be proactive and timely in sharing relevant information about allegations and investigation findings with the rest of the community. Again, he reassured that this will be done in a way that would not compromise the privacy and well-being of victims.

In the email, Prof Tan said: “Regardless of whether these incidents took place on or off campus, such behaviour threatens the safety and well-being of our NUS community. It desecrates the campus atmosphere, which is precious to all of us.

“The sad truth is that no matter how hard we try, sexual misconduct cannot be completely eradicated. Yet, we must be unrelenting in our desire and effort to tackle the issue head-on. Our approach has to be holistic, just, transparent and sensitive.”

Noting that sexual misconduct has become a growing concern for universities around the globe—500 complaints at Harvard University, 298 complaints at Yale University, and 187 reported incidents in Stanford University in 2019 alone—he pointed out figures in Singapore as well.

In 2019, a total of 1,605 cases of outrage of modesty were reported to the police.

Between 2015 to 2017, six local universities handled 56 student-related sexual misconduct cases, 14 of which occurred outside of campus, according to the Ministry of Education (MOE).

Prof Tan said that the NUS has also seen more students come forward to file reports of such allegations.

“Even though it may not augur well for the image and reputation of the university, I feel it is a good thing that more individuals are stepping forward. It shows a certain level of trust in the institution,” he added.

“No student or staff should suffer in silence. NUS will continue to strive to provide a safe and conducive platform for affected parties to verbalise and share their experiences and come forward in confidence.”

One of the recent cases involving NUS staff was when Professor Theodore G Hopf, the provost chair professor in the department of political science in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences was dismissed on 1 December for sexual misconduct with a student.

In November, the former director of the East Asian Institute at NUS, Professor Zheng Yongnian, was reported by the University to have behaved inappropriately with a subordinate when he hugged her without consent during a work meeting.

In October, Dr Jeremy Fernando was fired following allegations of sexual misconduct made against him by two students.

In 2019, a student called out NUS on social media for the way they—as well as police—handled her sexual misconduct case and the seemingly light punishment dished out to the perpetrator who was sentenced to counselling and community service and was made to write a letter of apology to the her after filming her in the shower without her consent.

This sparked a massive debate in the country as many called out the institution for the way it handled the case, leading to a review of the universities disciplinary and support frameworks for sexual misconduct cases as well as the establishment of the NUS Victim Care Unit.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

走廊跑跳、翻垃圾桶 居民追赶遭猴孙玩残

孙大圣的小孙子大闹组屋区,以致十余当地居民追着喊打,追了一个小时、穿过两栋组屋,猴子最终成功爬树逃跑了。 昨日(12日)有居民投诉,指在德惠巷第4座组屋有猴子出没觅食,在走廊跑跳、挖垃圾桶内的垃圾。 下午5时许正在组屋楼下散布的一名妇女指出,当时发现一只猴子在组屋走廊觅食,感到非常震惊。 其他的居民见状也开始拿出手机,对着猴子拍下视频。 她指出,猴子当时在组屋区内走来走去,甚至跑到游乐场的垃圾桶内觅食。 担心攻击游乐场孩童 十余居民因为害怕猴子会攻击游乐场的孩童,因此决定将猴子赶回树林。 岂知在刚刚驱赶时,猴子似乎被激怒,露出獠牙似乎要攻击人,但是转身就走。居民们见状就开始追逐,追到第六、第七栋组屋,约傍晚6时许,猴子就爬上树逃跑了。 庆幸的是,猴子的“到此一游”并没有攻击或伤害到任何人。 其实在面对猴子时,居民们应该怎么行动,农业食品兽医局(AVA)早前也因为多起猴子伤人事件,因此列出数项民众可注意事项,其中包括停止正在进行的事件、保持安静和冷静、不要有长久的视线接触等。

被控刑事诽谤 本社总编许渊臣明早九时出庭

总检察署指控本社总编许渊臣,允许《网络公民》网站刊载涉诽谤我国内阁成员内容的信函。后者在刑事法典第500条文(刑事诽谤)下被提控,将在明早9时前往法庭面控。 总检察署指,本社英语站在9月4日,上载了笔名Willy Sum作者所撰写的读者来函《谢健平脸书贴文的启示》(The take away from Seah Kian Ping’s Facebook post)。 文章内容被指提及“高层腐败”,损害我国内阁成员的声誉。…

英相“放任式防疫”反其道而行? 英国民众吓到不敢出门

武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情肆虐全球,各国对于抗疫过程也绷紧神经,丝毫不敢松懈,采取颜值控管出入境、限制边境、甚至封国封城防疫,然而在英国却选择另类的防疫方式,一开始开启“放任式防疫”,即只有症状严重者才需要做筛检,不再计算感染人数,也不禁止大型集会活动,随即引起各界批评。 直到两天前(16日),英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊才肯呼吁当地民众,减少非必要外出和与人接触;昨天宣布英国需像“战时政府”一样应对疫情,以及公布经济纾困计划。 目前英国已知确诊病例超过1960例,死亡人数60人。而当局以武汉冠病死亡率仅1巴仙为由,使用的“群体免疫”策略也引来医学界炮轰,但相信此举有助缓解因果医疗系统压力。 然而,在这样“放任式的防疫”下,有居住在英国的网友观察发现,这样的方式可能对英国民众反而凑效。 网友表示,他是从台湾搬到英国,所以也在观察两国的防疫设施,他发现两国的防疫措施上采取截然不同的方式。 对于台湾而言,在疫情开始时便积极准备,步步紧盯,对于每一例都紧密追踪,所以在过去两个与内,其防疫控管做得滴水不漏。 英国不停课、各行业照常营运、不检测 反观英国,在过去几周内确诊病例突然激增,却开始选择不作为的形式来选择防疫,即不取消任何聚会活动、不停课停班、各行各业照常营运、不做检测停止计算感染人数、生病自己在家休息不要到医院也不用通报的方式。 此言一出,也引发了英国陷入大恐慌,也掀起当地的抢购潮。 虽然招来很多的斥责但网友却表示,对于“耳朵一向很硬”,嘴里不停说该来的就会来、keep calm &…