Three years ago in March 2017, National Development Minister Lawrence Wong dropped a bombshell by warning Singaporeans not to assume that all old HDB flats will automatically be eligible for the Selective En bloc Redevelopment Scheme (Sers).

He said only about 4 per cent of HDB flats have been identified for Sers since it was launched in 1995. The En Bloc programme is offered only to HDB blocks located in sites with high redevelopment potential, he added.

He further warned that for the rest of the HDB flats, their leases will eventually run out and the flats returned to back to the government. “As the leases run down, especially towards the tail-end, the flat prices will come down correspondingly,” he said. In other words, when the lease runs out, the value of a HDB flat will go to zero.

This was completely unexpected as for many years, the PAP government had promised Singaporeans that by voting for PAP, the value of their HDB flat can continue to increase and be protected. Take for example, one of Wong’s predecessor Mah Bow Tan, then the National Development Minister, told everyone just before GE 2011, “We’re proud of the asset enhancement policy. (It) has given almost all Singaporeans a home of their own… that grows in value over time.”

Falling resale prices of old HDB flats

When the announcement came out from Wong, many HDB owners were naturally unhappy. Resale prices began to fall especially for the older HDB flats. Many were forced to sell at a much lower price.

For example in 2018, it was reported that a Mdm Chai was one of those affected (‘Owner sells 3-room HDB for 15% less after Wong’s comment about zero-value of expired flats‘). She received several offers when she first listed her 3-room HDB flat at Bukit Merah in January 2017, after her mum passed away. She was asking for $340,000, comparable to the market price of 3-room flats in that area at the time. Her flat had only 54 years left on its lease.

After Wong let “the cat out of the bag” in March 2017, offers started to dry up for Mdm Chai. Buyers told her that they were having second thoughts about buying her old flat with only 54 years of lease left. She then lowered the asking price to $320,000 but there were still no takers. Finally, she managed to get rid of her old flat in February 2018 about a year later, at a much reduced price of $288,000 – some $52,000 less than her initial asking price of $340,000. The value of Mdm Chai’s flat dropped 15% in slightly more than a year, thanks to Wong’s announcement.

Wong tries to talk up the market

In May 2018, Wong tried to talk up the market in Parliament by saying the older HDB flats still have value in them (‘There is still value in older HDB flats: Lawrence Wong‘).

He said that owners of older HDB flats have become “overly anxious” about how much their flats can fetch in the resale market. He assured that the older flats still have value that can be unlocked for retirement.

At the time, he presented some data in Parliament saying that an older 4-room flat with a lease of less than 60 years would sell for around $300,000, and a 5-room, for around $400,000 in non-mature estates.

The owners can consider downgrading after selling their flats. He said the sales proceeds would be more than enough to buy a smaller flat, say, a two-room flexi flat with a 40-year lease that costs around $100,000, while a three-room resale flat is around $250,000 depending on location. There is also the Lease Buyback Scheme and HDB owners can rent out one of their bedrooms too.

However, even if one wants to sell his old HDB flat, there are restrictions for buyers on the use of CPF to buy flats with remaining lease less than 60 years.

Resale prices of old HDB flats drop further since Wong’s “market talk”

Slightly more than 2 years have passed since Wong trying to talk up the market for the older HDB flats in Parliament in May 2018.

A check on 4 and 5-room HDB flats with lease of less than 60 years in non-mature estates has shown that their resale prices have dropped further since that time. Following are current data taken from HDB resale website:

Choa Chu Kang (4-room):

Average transacted price over last 12 months: $291,000 (3% below $300K).

Choa Chu Kang (5-room):

Average transacted price over last 12 months: $379,000 (5.3% below $400K).

Woodland (4-room):

Average transacted price over last 12 months: $250,000 (16.7% below $300K).

Woodland (5-room):

Average transacted price over last 12 months: $318,000 (20.5% below $400K).

Yishun (4-room):

Average transacted price over last 12 months: $277,000 (7.7% below $300K).

Former PAP National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan must be glad that he doesn’t need to run for GE 2020 anymore, since he would be accused of spreading “falsehood” with regard to his remarks of HDB flat “grows in value over time”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Teo Soh Lung: Can ISA detention reform a radical 17-year-old?

by Teo Soh Lung The recent detention without trial of a 17-year-old…

Three things you must know about ISA

~from Martyn See’s blog~ There are three things you need to know…

Elderly security guard succumbs to injuries caused while stopping a man urinating at shopping centre

Local Chinese newspaper, Shin Min Daily News reported that an elderly security…

《亚洲周刊》刊专题 质问何时恢复陈六使公民权

1963年9月23日,东南亚第一所华文大学南洋大学的创校人陈六使,被指控“与共产党份子合作”,被剥夺公民权。直到1972年老人家离逝,都未能获平反。 今年第48期(2020/11/30-12/6)的《亚洲周刊》刊载封面专题–《南洋大学等待平反   创办人陈六使公民权何时恢复?》,重访当年轰轰烈烈的教育抗争路,亦无疑向当今新加坡执政领袖抛出问题,如何重新看待南大课题。 2019年10月,南洋理工大学把校园内原名南洋谷的道路,易名“陈六使径”,肯定陈六使对教育的贡献。时任教育部长王乙康还主持揭牌仪式。“陈六使径”的设立也引发联想,许多校友和东南亚华人,都希望南大和陈六使获得平反。 “然而官方对此举完全不谈陈六使名誉是否恢复的问题,还有一些人议论的是,以陈六使对南大与华社的贡献之巨与气魄之大,路名却仅仅是一个微不足道的‘Walk’,既不匹配也显得小器。” 1953年,陈六使倡议创办以华文为主的大学,并率先捐出五百万新元。登高一呼,立马获得华人社会响应,“新马各界泉涌而来的捐献,涓滴成河海,尤其是新加坡本地,除了商家,无数市井小民、三轮车夫、舞女、小贩、洗衣妇,都为了一所完全属于民间的华文大学,默默献出自己的劳力和血汗,换成微不足道的捐款。” 《亚洲周刊》的文章提及,后来陈六使与英殖民者及已故李光耀的矛盾被政治化、甚至被视为眼中钉,结果被扣上“曾经积极与反国家共党分子合作”、对“南大在治安上成为马来亚之严重问题应负其责”为由,剥夺了陈六使的公民权。 南洋大学在一1956年正式开课,到1980年举行第21届毕业典礼为止,共培养毕业生约1万2千人,校友包括新加坡执政党政治人物蔡崇语、何家良、庄日坤、柯新治、陈原生、流亡政治人物谢太宝、何元泰、邓亮洪、反对派政治人物刘程强、艺术家陈瑞献、著名作家尤今、资深媒体人林任君、杜南发、潘正镭、澳洲历史学者杨进发、大马前内阁部长刘贤镇、企业家与社团领袖林源德、颜清文、历史学者李业霖、资深媒体人谢诗坚、评论人李万千、香港学者郑赤琰、财经专家曾渊沧、印尼出生的学者廖建裕等,都是南大校友。南大毕业生不像以英文为主流的新加坡大学毕业生,容易进入公务员体系或与官方相关的大企业,很多人在私人企业界闯荡或出洋深造,不少人成就斐然。 当年办校盛况今竟不复记忆 1958年3月30日南大落成典礼更是空前盛况,“前往校园的一条裕廊路塞车长达16公里,出席主宾总督顾德爵士,都为此迟到两个多小时”。 然而文章也感叹,短短两代人对当年那个缔造离逝的盛况,竟然不复记忆,甚至不愿提起。 其中一个原因,是李光耀在世前后的执政者,都不愿去面对它,在野党领袖也不敢、不便或不屑去提起它。李光耀在回忆录里试图隐晦自己在南大关闭事件中的角色,将倡导关闭南大的责任,归属于南大毕业的几名内阁成员。…