The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) released a statement today (2 July) to reveal that it has fulfilled one of the pledges under its “Four Yes, One No” campaign for the upcoming general election (GE).

It said that within just the first day of its campaign, the party managed to achieve “victory” of its call for “no” to a 10 million population after People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate Dr Vivian Balakrishnan said that Singapore will never have 10 million population.

“The SDP launched our GE campaign with its slogan of 4 Yeses and 1 No. Within Day 1 of our campaign, we have already achieved victory on our call for the “no” to a 10-million population,” the party said in its media statement that was shared on its official Facebook page.

It added, “At yesterday night’s televised debate, Dr Chee Soon Juan pressed PAP candidate Vivian Balakrishnan to categorically state that the government will not raise Singapore’s population to 10 million”.

“Dr Balakrishnan confirmed that the PAP would not raise the population to 10 million, not even 6.9 million.”

During last night’s GE2020 debate between three alternative parties along with PAP, Dr Balakrishnan and Dr Chee participated in a heated exchange on the issue of increasing Singapore’s population to 10 million.

Dr Chee questioned the PAP candidate about what Mr Heng Swee Keat had said in an earlier interview, which Dr Chee said indicated that Mr Heng was “toying” with the idea of increasing the country’s population to 10 million.

To this, Dr Balakrishnan said: “Let me state for the record. We will never have 10 million. We won’t even have 6.9 million.”

SDP also said in today’s media statement that Dr Balakrishnan mentioned that the alternative party had “raised a strawman argument because PAP had never said that it would increase the population to those numbers”.

Adding to that, Mr Heng also took to his Facebook this morning to deny that the never targeted a 10-million population.

However, SDP said in its statement that The Straits Times published an article in March 2019, and the newspaper quoted: “[Mr Heng] cited former chief planner Liu Thai Ker, who said in 2014 that Singapore should plan for 10 million people for it to remain sustainable in the long term.”

To this, the statement read, “The average person reading the report would conclude that Mr Heng was is, indeed, “toying with the idea” of a 10 million population as indicated by Dr Chee.”

If that’s not all, SDP also noted that author Sudhir Vadaketh and former GIC chief economist Yeoh Lam Keong also expressed a similar view as the party in questioning about the 10 million population target.

“As such, we take strong objection to Dr Balakrishnan’s accusation that Dr Chee had raised a “strawman” argument. The idea of a 10-million population is not an SDP’s invention or imagination. It was first broached by Mr Liu Thai Ker, whom Mr Heng cited in his comments and reported by the Straits Times,” SDP stated.

It added, “Mr Heng wrote in his FB today that the Straits Times had clarified that he did not say that “Singapore should plan to increase its population to 10 million people.” In that case, he should take up the issue with the Straits Times who mention the figure in its report and attributed it to Mr Heng.”

Given that Dr Chee managed to get “an assurance from the PAP that it has no intention of increasing the population to 6.9 or 10 million”, SDP said it now wants PAP to let Singaporeans know what is “its target population is beyond the vague statement that it would be “significantly below” 6.9 million”.

“Voters deserve to know.”

Subscribe
Notify of
17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The police is not entirely sure what caused the “loud sounds” heard across Singapore

On Saturday morning (27 April), it was reported that “loud sounds” were…

UK starts mass vaccination with Pfizer’s vaccine while EDB backed one currently on trial in SG

On Tuesday (8 Dec), Britain became the first Western country to begin…

That “little increase” in hawker stall rental rates means “a lot” to hawkers, Makansutra founder KF Seetoh responds to NEA

Even that “little increase” in the rental rates would mean “a lot”…

陈川仁吁重新审视老龄化叙述 惟国内老少面对退休积蓄困境

随着我国逐渐步入老化社会,老龄化问题也随之引起许多议论,针对相关课题,人民行动党乐龄小组主席陈川仁表示,应该重新审视围绕在老龄化周边的论述。 上周日(13日),陈川仁受邀出席人民行动党乐龄小组为国际老年人日举办的纪念活动,在致词中敦促,新加坡人应透过各项社区活动与个人参与,将新加坡变成适宜老年长居与养老的地方。 他随后也向记者透露“立国一代”(Merdeka Generation)如今却被视为是一个挑战或社会问题,并表示与“立国”的意义有所不同。 “让我震撼的是“立国”一字,原有自由和独立的意义,但为什么如今却将它视为是生活的另一个阶段,所以我们需要改变它。” 他也透露人民行动党推出新手册协助老年人更好理解相关社会政策,如老年员工公积金缴款率、及解释最新政策。此外,陈川仁也称老年员工在零工经济(gig economy)下持续参与工作,可改变老年人的负面印象。 临时工泛指在工作场所里非正式雇用的劳工,通常以日薪计酬。 也不像正式劳工能够享有退休金与每月最低工资的保障。 “你可以想象如果我们有能力养活自己,我们可以在自己的生活中实现自由独立的原则,这是一件多么令人兴奋的事情。就如当初“立国一代”的名号,为了能够实现自由和独立的原则。” 高生活成本老人吃不消 但果真如此吗?近年来,老龄化问题持续被讨论,亦经常在众多报导中看见,生活成本的提升与退休积蓄不足,经常迫使他们重返工作岗位。…