Even that “little increase” in the rental rates would mean “a lot” to hawkers, said Makansutra founder KF Seetoh in a Facebook post on Monday (28 Jun), following the National Environment Agency’s (NEA) clarifications that the increase in hawker stall rents have not exceeded S$300.

The NEA earlier on Saturday (26 Jun) stated that the rental rates for hawker stalls have been “kept unchanged throughout three years”, adding that monthly hawker stall rents can be “as low as a few hundred dollars, or even S$1”.

The statement was made after Mr Seetoh posted on Facebook last Friday (25 Jun) regarding the announcement that hawker stall’s rent would be raised by 40 per cent. He proceeded to slam the NEA for raising hawker stall rents amid challenging times.

According to NEA, the renewal of tenancy three years later will be based on prevailing market rates assessed by independent professional valuers, which can be higher or lower than the previous rate.

“In recent years, rental revision upwards at tenancy renewals in our hawker centres have not exceeded $300. On the other hand, there have been rental revisions downwards of more than $300 upon tenancy renewals.

“It is misleading to look at percentage increases alone as a $300 increase from a low rental will appear as a large percentage increase,” said the agency.

NEA also pointed out that it had frozen rental increases from 1 April last year to 31 March this year due to the difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The agency added that hawkers were provided with five months of rental waivers and three months of subsidies for table-cleaning and centralised dishwashing services, as well as the Self-Employed Person Income Relief of nine months for eligible hawkers.

In response to the NEA’s statement, Mr Seetoh took to his Facebook earlier today to emphasise that it is about “timing and empathy, not the quantum nor the earlier well-intended rent waivers”.

He also shared a letter received by a pair of hawkers, which indicates the amount of rental hike offered to them has gone from S$800 to S$1,100 per month. The date of the letter was censored but the year in which the revised charges would apply is “2021”.

Mr Seetoh noted that the hawkers now have to pay S$1,550 per month, adding that they have decided to close permanently when their term ended.

“It may not sound like alot to many, but the hawker said he will accept and ‘move on’ which really meant they will quit and close permanently when the term ended.

“That ‘little’ increase’ meant alot to the hawker. Both are now jobless and contemplating the next move,” he said.

Mr Seetoh went on to say that the price hike also affected the new assistant and trainee that the hawkers were grooming to take over and/or set up another outlet.

“Now, in one by-the-book policy swoop, two Singaporeans are made jobless. I don’t know how many more hawkers were affected by this rule this last 12 months,” he remarked.

Mr Seetoh previously slammed NEA for increasing hawker stall rents by 40% amid pandemic

NEA’s statement on Saturday came after the Makansutra founder voiced his concerns about raising the hawker stall’s rent by 40 per cent.

In a Facebook post a day last Friday, Mr Seetoh did not mention which hawker stalls are subjected to the rental hike, but include a letter by NEA informing a stall owner on the rental raise.

He slammed the agency for raising the rental rates amid challenging times, asking if this act of increasing hawkers rental rates by 40 per cent – whilst coming up with a campaign informing the public to pay more for food – is in line with world standards.

“Here we all are doing our best to #supportourhawkers, and there they are at same time raising the hawkers rent by almost 40%… Why oh why I ask. You may need to claw back to top up the national coffers but do your leaders even know it’s a horrible timing to do so now. This hawker had been languishing in sales this whole year,” said Mr Seetoh.

He asserted that although two people are allowed to dine-in, in accordance to rules set in Phase 3 (Heightened Alert) phase, the situation is not great for the hawkers.

This is because most people are buying things online, making it difficult for hawkers who are working offline to make sales.

“Lotsa folks are buying online and WFM, a seductive and convenient culture ingrained into us over the last year and many offline hawkers are left to dry out,” Mr Seetoh stressed.

“Two to a table with 3 turns at peak lunch hour is only 6 dishes n drinks, that’s just scratching at hope’s door. Top that up with this ‘professional valuers’ decree that rents must be raised now, it is another death knell for the #supportourhawkers movement,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Who holds the sovereign wealth of this nation and why?

Kenneth Jeyaretnam proposes alternative investments ideas for S’pore’s 2 SWFs.

Heritage Foundation: Singapore ranks first as economically freest country globally, dethroning Hong Kong

Based on the Washington think tank, Heritage Foundation’s Economic Freedom Index (EFI),…

Iqah’s story – The single mum who became an unwitting drug mule

The following article was first published on the Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign (SADPC)…

部长曾推托国会直播“需求不高” 首两日已冲破8万播放次数

在2021年的首次国会中,我国开启历史性的国会直播,公众可在通讯及新闻部的官方Youtube频道,全程观看当日国会议事。 目前频道设有英语口译,相信将来会拓展增加华语和马来语口译。本社发现,在本周一(4日)首次进行直播时,观看人数就已突破6万播放次数。 但是回顾2017年,当时任职的通讯及新闻部长徐芳达,在答复工人党议员毕丹星的质询表示,根据所收集的数据,国会直播的收视率仍然很低。 “即使如重要的演说如预算案,观看人数也不及当晚观看新闻摘要的百分之十,不到1巴仙的观众使用网络直播观看预算案的进程。”这也是迄今为止为什么政府一直不开放国会直播的原因。 在Youtube直播后的影片,会留下播放次数的记录,仅仅首日国会直播英语口译版,就有高达5万2526播放次数,加上原声版的1万6388人次,意味着首日就有多达6万8914人次。即便隔日的英语口译和原声版直播,观看次数也达到2万0416人次。 换言之,这样的数据似乎已打脸2017年徐芳达,指国会直播“需求不高”的说法。 本社也留意到,与首日直播相比,第二天的观看人数会比较少,个中原因很可能是观众未留意到周二仍有直播。 而在上周末,国会直播一事已被媒体大肆报道和宣传,因此观众相对知道有关本周一将会开启首次国会直播一事,但却对于第二天的直播谈论不多。 另一种解释很可能是由于周二直播开始得较早,要知道国会通常于人们办公期间开始,并且可能在下午的时间进行。 即便如此,也不能否认,新加坡国会直播仍有观众观看的事实。