Even that “little increase” in the rental rates would mean “a lot” to hawkers, said Makansutra founder KF Seetoh in a Facebook post on Monday (28 Jun), following the National Environment Agency’s (NEA) clarifications that the increase in hawker stall rents have not exceeded S$300.

The NEA earlier on Saturday (26 Jun) stated that the rental rates for hawker stalls have been “kept unchanged throughout three years”, adding that monthly hawker stall rents can be “as low as a few hundred dollars, or even S$1”.

The statement was made after Mr Seetoh posted on Facebook last Friday (25 Jun) regarding the announcement that hawker stall’s rent would be raised by 40 per cent. He proceeded to slam the NEA for raising hawker stall rents amid challenging times.

According to NEA, the renewal of tenancy three years later will be based on prevailing market rates assessed by independent professional valuers, which can be higher or lower than the previous rate.

“In recent years, rental revision upwards at tenancy renewals in our hawker centres have not exceeded $300. On the other hand, there have been rental revisions downwards of more than $300 upon tenancy renewals.

“It is misleading to look at percentage increases alone as a $300 increase from a low rental will appear as a large percentage increase,” said the agency.

NEA also pointed out that it had frozen rental increases from 1 April last year to 31 March this year due to the difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The agency added that hawkers were provided with five months of rental waivers and three months of subsidies for table-cleaning and centralised dishwashing services, as well as the Self-Employed Person Income Relief of nine months for eligible hawkers.

In response to the NEA’s statement, Mr Seetoh took to his Facebook earlier today to emphasise that it is about “timing and empathy, not the quantum nor the earlier well-intended rent waivers”.

He also shared a letter received by a pair of hawkers, which indicates the amount of rental hike offered to them has gone from S$800 to S$1,100 per month. The date of the letter was censored but the year in which the revised charges would apply is “2021”.

Mr Seetoh noted that the hawkers now have to pay S$1,550 per month, adding that they have decided to close permanently when their term ended.

“It may not sound like alot to many, but the hawker said he will accept and ‘move on’ which really meant they will quit and close permanently when the term ended.

“That ‘little’ increase’ meant alot to the hawker. Both are now jobless and contemplating the next move,” he said.

Mr Seetoh went on to say that the price hike also affected the new assistant and trainee that the hawkers were grooming to take over and/or set up another outlet.

“Now, in one by-the-book policy swoop, two Singaporeans are made jobless. I don’t know how many more hawkers were affected by this rule this last 12 months,” he remarked.

Mr Seetoh previously slammed NEA for increasing hawker stall rents by 40% amid pandemic

NEA’s statement on Saturday came after the Makansutra founder voiced his concerns about raising the hawker stall’s rent by 40 per cent.

In a Facebook post a day last Friday, Mr Seetoh did not mention which hawker stalls are subjected to the rental hike, but include a letter by NEA informing a stall owner on the rental raise.

He slammed the agency for raising the rental rates amid challenging times, asking if this act of increasing hawkers rental rates by 40 per cent – whilst coming up with a campaign informing the public to pay more for food – is in line with world standards.

“Here we all are doing our best to #supportourhawkers, and there they are at same time raising the hawkers rent by almost 40%… Why oh why I ask. You may need to claw back to top up the national coffers but do your leaders even know it’s a horrible timing to do so now. This hawker had been languishing in sales this whole year,” said Mr Seetoh.

He asserted that although two people are allowed to dine-in, in accordance to rules set in Phase 3 (Heightened Alert) phase, the situation is not great for the hawkers.

This is because most people are buying things online, making it difficult for hawkers who are working offline to make sales.

“Lotsa folks are buying online and WFM, a seductive and convenient culture ingrained into us over the last year and many offline hawkers are left to dry out,” Mr Seetoh stressed.

“Two to a table with 3 turns at peak lunch hour is only 6 dishes n drinks, that’s just scratching at hope’s door. Top that up with this ‘professional valuers’ decree that rents must be raised now, it is another death knell for the #supportourhawkers movement,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tan Meng Wah urges Singaporeans to consider if 4G leaders work for the interests of Singapore as a whole, or are they working for interests of specific groups of people

As the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) conducted a Meet The People session…

Educating the next generation

Education minister says S’pore must go beyond academic KPIs, reports Lee Song Kwang.

遭偷拍后经历难过、不安 马芸:曝光事件为警惕他人

新加坡国立大学的偷拍事件经历超过一周,除了各界挞伐和质疑涉事者受到的处分不足,而让事件曝光的马芸,也首次接受媒体现身说法,谈及事件后她陷入的不安和痛苦,强调自己曝光事件,不是为了引起关注,而是希望藉此让各界正视问题,不要再有下一个受害者。 受害者马芸表示,当她陷入痛苦不堪时,涉事者却还可以如常生活。 于今年2月在台湾进行交换学生计划期间,23岁的马芸和一名来自华盛顿美国大学的学生相遇。马芸对这名友人敞开心扉,说起了她在面对偷拍事件中的挣扎。 她也对美国在处理类似案件的方式之不同,感到非常惊讶。 马芸的朋友说道,在美国,涉事者将会面临更严厉的惩罚,性骚扰受害者也会获得校方和不同团体的支持。 与友人一席之谈改变了她的想法,马芸决定说出来。 马芸说她决定在Instagram发布一系列故事,说明她于去年11月,是如何在学校尤索夫宿舍(Eusoff Hall)被一名男学生偷拍的经过,但是并不是为了寻求关注。 只是为了让她们提高警惕 这名国大通讯和新媒体科系的学生说道,“我将事件曝光在Instagram,只是为了想要我生命中的人们,包括我的家人,更重要的,我在国大的朋友们知道他做了什么,以致他们可以保持警惕,并留意类似他的人,以致类似事件不会发生在他们的身上。” 马芸昨晚在参与多达600名学生的校方对话会后,接受了《海峡时报》的专访。这是自她Instagram故事曝光并掀起举国瞩目后,她首次接受的媒体专访。她在肯特岗校区(Kent Ridge…

要小贩营业超过12小时? 读者批社企“现代奴隶制”

从2015年开始,国内至少有七座小贩中心,以社会企业模式经营。 本地有114做小贩中心,在2027年前,还会增减13座小贩中心。不过根据卫生部兼环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士,日前在拜访淡滨尼综合站小贩中心时,曾对媒体表示,未来是否会继续沿用社企模式,还有待评估。 早前有小贩反映,他们在这些社企经营的摊位,被征收附加费用,例如高达1千200元的中央清洗碗盘费。而一般社企小贩中心,管理层所征收的中央洗碗盘费用,约介于600-800元。 淡滨尼综合站小贩中心,也被誉为首个24小时营业的小贩中心。 事实上,就有读者在两年前,在咖啡店集团旗下子公司OTMH,于2016年11月正式接管淡滨尼小贩中心前,致函本社申诉,有关社企管理层对小贩们的要求,形同要落实“现代版的奴隶制”。 当时,有关读者有意申请该小贩中心摊位,于是联系社企OTMH公司,被告知业者需至少营业12个小时,最长24小时。 鼓励小贩经营超过12小时 这意味着,要实施现代咖啡店24小时不打烊概念,管理层可以要求摊主们拉长经营时间,也更倾向于把摊位租给愿意长时间工作的小贩,最好是能24小时、每周七天都营业。 读者认为,小贩和其他辛勤工作的新加坡人一样,也需要休息和休假,他们也要陪家人子女。压榨小贩们的劳动和时间,剥夺他们应有的休息,藉此最大化小贩中心的盈利。 该读者也质疑,为何审核小贩申请资格的不再是环境局,而全权交给有关社企公司。 他认为,完全由该公司自行决定而不是公开招标,有欠公平。这是因为小贩中心是用公款建设,政府才是拥有者,社会企业只是管理小贩中心的代理人。 “为何他们(指社企)可以被赋予如此多自由,在不公布遴选过程的情况下,来自行选择小贩?”…