China’s new security law has sent fear coursing through many Hong Kong residents, but the city’s commercial community has largely embraced it as a way to get back to doing business.

The controversial legislation has granted mainland Chinese authorities unprecedented control as they seek to end the pro-democracy protests that plunged Hong Kong into turmoil last year.

Despite warnings from rights groups and legal analysts that it could be a fatal blow to the city’s legal autonomy and political freedoms, many in the business community have welcomed the law as a way to restore stability.

The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce described the passing of the law earlier this week as “instrumental in helping to restore stability and certainty to Hong Kong, which has been severely impacted by the social unrest since last year”.

“We need a stable environment which the (security law) aims to provide.”

British banking giants HSBC and Standard Chartered — both with a major presence in Hong Kong and on the mainland — joined other firms in publicly backing the law last month.

Analysts and members of the business community have said the law could add to the risk and complexity of doing business in Hong Kong, but it is unlikely to spark a mass exodus of foreign firms.

Hong Kong stocks rallied almost three percent Thursday, led by property firms with investors betting that the law will restore stability to the city.

“By and large, the mindset of business people is always to try and carry on as if nothing has changed, and try and avoid the political risks,” said Ben Bland, a political analyst at the Lowy Institute, an Australian think tank.

“So I’m not surprised by the sort of reactions we’ve seen.”

Jes Staley, the CEO of Barclays, told Bloomberg News it was a “very difficult political situation”.

He added: “We’re not going to get involved in the politics of Hong Kong.”

Grave concerns

The text of the law has set off alarm bells with its broad phrasing of offences and the supremacy of the mainland’s Communist Party-controlled courts over Hong Kong’s.

The city transformed itself into a global financial hub thanks to the reputation of its independent judiciary, becoming a centre for settlements and arbitration — especially with mainland firms.

That legal autonomy — among other freedoms for its residents — was guaranteed for 50 years under the “One Country, Two Systems” agreement that saw Britain hand over the colony to China in 1997.

It created a firewall between the city and China’s opaque legal system — and also helped Hong Kong act as a gateway to the mainland for foreign firms.

The new law has undermined that system, and the Hong Kong Bar Association said it was “gravely concerned”.

The law threatens protections including fair trials, fundamental rights and freedom of expression, the organisation said in a blistering critique on Wednesday.

While there is unlikely to be an overnight flight, analysts said the risks are likely to grow in the future.

“In the long run, the law will most likely embolden Beijing and local allies to put greater political pressure on companies and their employees to closely adhere to… Beijing’s agenda,” William Nee of Amnesty International told Bloomberg.

Analysts have pointed to how firms have been targeted by Beijing on political issues, most notably the backlash last year against Hong Kong airline Cathay Pacific over its staff allegedly supporting pro-democracy protesters.

HSBC also faced pressure from a pro-Beijing former Hong Kong chief executive before its show of support for the law, and analysts said companies would be keen to avoid that fate.

‘Enormous market’

But Hong Kong’s status as a gateway to the riches of mainland China — the world’s second-largest economy — is likely to remain the top consideration for investors, analysts said.

The city’s equity and property markets have been flooded with mainland billions in recent years.

By the end of 2019, mainland companies made up 73 percent, or $3.4 trillion, of the market capitalisation in Hong Kong, according to the Hong Kong Trade Development Council.

Some of China’s biggest state-owned and private companies are listed in the city.

Most recently, Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com raised almost $4 billion last month in what was the world’s second-biggest IPO this year.

“I do feel this will add to the complexity of working in Hong Kong or operating out of Hong Kong,” Jun Bei Liu of Tribeca Investment Partners told Bloomberg.

“But I think Hong Kong is still very, very relevant and it is the hub to have access to China, which is an enormous market.”

– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

长期需求仍强劲 王瑞杰相信半导体企业能渡过难关

上月,路透社报导,受中美贸易战、对中国华为的政治关切以及消费者需求放缓等因素影响,新加坡芯片和半导体业者已开始放慢生产速度,并裁减数百个工作岗位。 该报导指芯片制造业,在去年占新加坡制造业产出(output)的近三分之一。该行业的下滑,也强化了对于新加坡未来数月可能陷入衰退的预期。 不过,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰今日(14日)表示,尽管全球电子领域进入疲弱周期,不过他相信新加坡应该为未来投资,并加强半导体行业生态圈,能在需求复苏时抓紧新机遇。 他认为,我国半导体行业经历许多商业周期,每一次企业都能度过难关,抓紧机会转型并变得更坚强。 他是在今日出席美国芯片制造商美光科技(Micron Technology),在本地设立的新设施开幕仪式上,这么表示。 王瑞杰说,有研究显示明年开始需求会复苏,接下来预计每年增幅介于二至九巴仙,故此长期来看对半导体的需求仍强劲。 去年4月,美光科技宣布未来五年将在本地投资扩建净室(cleanroom)设施,该美国企业也在2015年投资40亿美元扩建NAND快闪记忆体加工厂。过去20年,已在本地投资共150亿元。 新加坡被视为仰赖出口的经济体和经济风向标。长期以来,芯片生产也是新加坡成功的核心要素之一,而许多全球最大的芯片制造商,也在我国运营。我国生产的微芯片,被用在手机到汽车等广泛领域。

Rights to freedom of assembly: Petition for the Gov’t to review the Public Order Act

As we revisit the case where two young climate activists from Fridays4Future…

五年前掉入下水道受伤 女子向公用事业局索偿500万元!

2015年12月1日,一名任职会计师的女子在经过西门路(Simon Road)时,在实龙岗上段的交界处不慎掉进一个无孔盖的下水道。 这一摔导致,导致她擦伤、脚踝骨折,一度住院五天,甚至于脊椎椎间盘突出,她无法跑步、腰部会出现间接性疼痛。若坐下超过1小时都会感到颈部疼痛。右手活动也因神经损伤受限制。 五年后,这名47岁女子陈慧萍(Chan Hui Peng译音),决定起诉公用事业局(PUB),索偿高达500万元!在庭上,她的代表律师指责该局需负起至少七成的责任,要求针对她所承受的痛苦、未来的医药费、失去生育能力、失去工作能力等等索偿。 女子也声称自己患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),有出现头痛、焦虑和恐慌的症状,还有重度抑郁症和精神分裂症。甚至于,对洞穴都感到恐惧而做噩梦。 公用事业局的辩护律师指出,当时现场有三名工作人员在检查下水道,女子接近洞口时却没有绕道而行;但女子也驳斥,自己并没有使用手机,却非常注意前方,也指下水道被树叶遮住,她只看到“一大片阴影”。 至于三名工作人员,女子称他们都穿便装,现场也没有树立告示牌。 辩护律师则指女子的陈述“不诚实”,也表示辩方心理专家会鉴定陈女士是否真的患有创伤后障碍。