Several photos showing people hanging out at Robertson Quay without observing social distancing and wearing a face mask have been circulated on social media and garnered attraction online.
A Facebook user Lectress Pat on Saturday (16 May) shared these photos on Facebook, noting that there has been no single enforcer patrolling at Robertson Quay when the photos being took on Saturday’s evening around 6.25pm.
As three customers were spotted chatting outside of a beer bar in one of the photos, the staff of these F&B establishments did nothing to stop these people from drinking at their premise nor did they remove the standing tables, according to Lectress Pat.
The post also captioned, “So perhaps the authorities can enlighten many of us… The usual local HDB folks are being monitored closely, apprehended promptly, yet such gatherings with many drinking openly and no masks on, are tolerated in certain ‘Sovereign’ zones… Double Standards Much???”
In the photos, it can also be seen that some people were spotted not wearing a mask and sitting close to each other at the staircase outside of restaurants.

URA found majority of operators and individuals to be compliant with safe distancing measures at Robertson Quay

Following this, on the next day (17 May), the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has issued a statement regarding these viral photos of people gathering around restaurants in Robertson Quay.
Noting that they were aware of this incident, URA said that majority of operators and individuals “found to be compliant with safe distancing measures” during their safe distancing patrols at Robertson Quay.
“However, we observed that some restaurants in the area were selling take-away alcohol to patrons, which had contributed to more individuals gathering around these premises,” the statement read.
Hence, URA said it has issued a written direction to these restaurants to cease the sale of take-away alcohol with immediate effect.
It added, “Any contravention of such directions is an offence and we will not hesitate to take such parties to task.”
Furthermore, the agency purported that they will not hesitate to take further enforcement action against business operators if they find other infringements of safe distancing measures.
“Similarly, individuals found to be in breach of safe distancing measures will also be fined,” the agency said.
Meanwhile, one of the F&B establishments at Robertson Quay, TAP took to its Facebook on Sunday (17 May) and clarified that the photos captured few customers chatting besides a table with cups of beer were not at their restaurants.
“We have addressed this situation in a previous post, but removed it due to the lack of clarification that resulted in a overwhelming amount of confused commenters. As such, it should be highlighted once again that the tables featured in the photographs making their rounds do not belong to TAP,” it wrote.
Highlighting the importance of adhering to the circuit breaker measures, TAP in its post advised the public to not having food and drinks outside “whether or not a restaurant has an available table”.
While TAP has received negative response due to the related incident, it also urged the people to be respectful towards each other as everyone is together in this trying time.

Image source: TAP Facebook on 17 May
 
Though the authorities has clarified the incident, however, many netizens on the Facebook page of Mothership.sg and The Straits Times, pointed out the “double standard” by the Government when issue fines for those who not complying with safe distancing measures and not wearing masks.
They noted that the local residents have been fined and some work permit pass holders had their work permit revoked due to breaching safe distancing rules. However, it is hardly to see the expats being penalised if they flouted the same rules.

This condition, one netizen even described as “one county two systems” in Singapore.
Some netizens also questioned whether the enforcement officers are more lenient to foreigners because of their “identity privilege”. The netizens hoped that the foreigners should be fined as same as the locals when they are not abiding to the rules.


One netizens also asked that why the enforcement officers were not seen at the areas, which is the popular spot among foreigners, but planted so many enforcement officers at heartland areas to fine Singaporeans. “Foreigners/expats have its privileges? Afraid to fine or charge them?” the netizen asked.

Other netizen opined that the foreigners in Singaporeans “are totally not compliant to our countries laws” as he observed many are still strolling outside without wearing a mask during this period.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ST and CNA report that lawyer Kwa not involved in LKY’s last will but Yahoo & social media publish Ms Lee’s posting saying otherwise

Two years ago, when Kwa Kim Li, who is the managing partner…

Number of neighbour disputes hit high

From Today newspaper. — Case 1: A family, who had just moved…

工作设备被充公 许渊臣用旧手机发文解释诽谤指控调查

本社总编许渊臣,针对有关刑事诽谤指控的调查,作出数点澄清,为外界解惑。 在今年9月18日,资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),援引《广播法》第16(1)项,要求本社在六小时内撤下被指违规的贴文,本社已遵照该局的指示删除贴文。 这篇文章是由一名非常规撰稿人发表。资媒局质问本社刊载这篇文章的编采决策,许渊臣这么写道: “就出版编辑标准而言,已阐明该文章为读者来函。我们的立场,公众针对政府是否腐败可保留个人意见。例如,总理已在国会澄清弟妹对他的指控,那任何人重提总理弟妹的控诉,也算是不符事实的?” 至于文章中指控当权者篡改宪法,任何对宪法的修改,例如违背公众意见,为了特定议程修改总统选举制,都可算是篡改。 许渊臣也回应,对读者来函只负责校对文句,如涉及任何未公开事实的指控,本社将与有关当局求证。他也重申,若整篇文章牵涉如藐视法庭或刑事诽谤等法律问题,都不会被刊登,除非有关读者能提供进一步的资讯佐证。 个体或机构是不可能以上述形式对政府构成伤害的。在欠缺媒体自由的情况下,政府已经在多个场合重申,容许公民批评政府。 根据资媒局文告,在上述文章被移除后,资媒局在10月4日向警方报案。 警方在星期二上午依据庭令,扣押了我的两台桌面型电脑、两部手机、三台笔记型电脑、两部平板电脑、三部硬盘和其它电子储存设备等。 许渊臣申请在警方完成调查后能把归还上述设备,但被拒绝了。只有结案之后,才能索回。 他在昨午3时30分,在广东民大厦接受盘问,至11时30分结束。目前,上述案件还在调查中。 –许渊臣透过旧手机撰文发布…

【冠状病毒19】8月21日新增117确诊 13入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月21日中午12时,本地新增117例冠病19确诊,六例社区病例,新增13例入境病例。 其中六例社区病例,包括三名本地公民或永久居民,以及三名工作证件持有者,而13例入境病例则在入境我国后就开始履行居家通知。 至于其余新增病例都是隔离中的客工。 本地累计确诊已增至5万6216例。 当局仍在收集病例详情并将在今晚公布细节。