Several photos showing people hanging out at Robertson Quay without observing social distancing and wearing a face mask have been circulated on social media and garnered attraction online.
A Facebook user Lectress Pat on Saturday (16 May) shared these photos on Facebook, noting that there has been no single enforcer patrolling at Robertson Quay when the photos being took on Saturday’s evening around 6.25pm.
As three customers were spotted chatting outside of a beer bar in one of the photos, the staff of these F&B establishments did nothing to stop these people from drinking at their premise nor did they remove the standing tables, according to Lectress Pat.
The post also captioned, “So perhaps the authorities can enlighten many of us… The usual local HDB folks are being monitored closely, apprehended promptly, yet such gatherings with many drinking openly and no masks on, are tolerated in certain ‘Sovereign’ zones… Double Standards Much???”
In the photos, it can also be seen that some people were spotted not wearing a mask and sitting close to each other at the staircase outside of restaurants.

URA found majority of operators and individuals to be compliant with safe distancing measures at Robertson Quay

Following this, on the next day (17 May), the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has issued a statement regarding these viral photos of people gathering around restaurants in Robertson Quay.
Noting that they were aware of this incident, URA said that majority of operators and individuals “found to be compliant with safe distancing measures” during their safe distancing patrols at Robertson Quay.
“However, we observed that some restaurants in the area were selling take-away alcohol to patrons, which had contributed to more individuals gathering around these premises,” the statement read.
Hence, URA said it has issued a written direction to these restaurants to cease the sale of take-away alcohol with immediate effect.
It added, “Any contravention of such directions is an offence and we will not hesitate to take such parties to task.”
Furthermore, the agency purported that they will not hesitate to take further enforcement action against business operators if they find other infringements of safe distancing measures.
“Similarly, individuals found to be in breach of safe distancing measures will also be fined,” the agency said.
Meanwhile, one of the F&B establishments at Robertson Quay, TAP took to its Facebook on Sunday (17 May) and clarified that the photos captured few customers chatting besides a table with cups of beer were not at their restaurants.
“We have addressed this situation in a previous post, but removed it due to the lack of clarification that resulted in a overwhelming amount of confused commenters. As such, it should be highlighted once again that the tables featured in the photographs making their rounds do not belong to TAP,” it wrote.
Highlighting the importance of adhering to the circuit breaker measures, TAP in its post advised the public to not having food and drinks outside “whether or not a restaurant has an available table”.
While TAP has received negative response due to the related incident, it also urged the people to be respectful towards each other as everyone is together in this trying time.

Image source: TAP Facebook on 17 May
 
Though the authorities has clarified the incident, however, many netizens on the Facebook page of Mothership.sg and The Straits Times, pointed out the “double standard” by the Government when issue fines for those who not complying with safe distancing measures and not wearing masks.
They noted that the local residents have been fined and some work permit pass holders had their work permit revoked due to breaching safe distancing rules. However, it is hardly to see the expats being penalised if they flouted the same rules.

This condition, one netizen even described as “one county two systems” in Singapore.
Some netizens also questioned whether the enforcement officers are more lenient to foreigners because of their “identity privilege”. The netizens hoped that the foreigners should be fined as same as the locals when they are not abiding to the rules.


One netizens also asked that why the enforcement officers were not seen at the areas, which is the popular spot among foreigners, but planted so many enforcement officers at heartland areas to fine Singaporeans. “Foreigners/expats have its privileges? Afraid to fine or charge them?” the netizen asked.

Other netizen opined that the foreigners in Singaporeans “are totally not compliant to our countries laws” as he observed many are still strolling outside without wearing a mask during this period.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡能复制大马变天?(2) 柔净选盟 国阵堡垒区办集会

2012年,隔着新柔长堤的柔佛仍牢牢掌控在国阵手中,即便在2008年全国大选,柔佛州国阵只丢失了一个选区巴克里,人民海啸也未冲倒这座老树盘根国阵堡垒。但即便如此,柔佛州公民组织干净选举联盟,毅然在首府新山举办净选盟3.0集会,就是希望能撼动霸权的主干,激发柔佛人民的政治醒觉。 柔佛非政府组织愿景工程(ENGAGE)主席范平东,也是该州南部净选盟副主席,在18日举行的“新加坡能否复制大马变天”时事论坛,分享柔佛公民组织的经验。 他说,当时受到净选盟主席安美嘉邀请,动员柔佛支持者出席在首都吉隆坡举行的集会。“可是在开会时,有同志就提到,为何不在柔佛同步办一场集会?因为巫统的发源地就在柔佛,马华的堡垒区也在这里。” 撼动国阵“主干” “与其拨动其他的树枝,倒不如直接撼动国阵的主干,这是我们当时的想法。于是就叫上志同道合者,动员了50人协助印传单、做宣传等。” 范平东说,当时根本就不知道什么是记者会,但还是办了,请来媒体柔宣传柔佛新山场的净选盟集会。他坦言,主流媒体并不搭理,只有中文媒体还给了中肯的报导。 https://youtu.be/80efIClIB2Q 他说,当地民众为了宣扬民主理念,参与者都是自费,好像推销员般到各个超级市场,协助民主登记成为选民,因为只要增加选民人数,才有可能在选票上削弱国阵势力。 由于资源都掌握在州国阵手上,可以预见警察、市议会都拒绝颁发集会准证,理由是当天有军警球赛和摇滚演唱会。 范平东说,原本预计只有数百人出席,当天净选盟支持者当天还是成功举办了和平集会,出席者超过八千人。范平东说,主办当局是基于宪法第十条,保障人民和平集会权力。他说,集会者在操场500米外集合。还得有不同的对策,应付被警方驱赶、干涉等可能情况。 “在活动前自愿者们都是挨家逐户派集会传单,从我们接触的普通群众,我们能感受到民心思变,是因为人民的支持,柔佛的社运才能支撑下去。” 他认为,马来西亚的变天,背后是经历了20年不间断的民间运动,多少人愿意付出代价,甚至有人被拘留、面临破产等。…

王瑞杰要促进年轻人工作生活平衡 网民:只是梦幻理论

“政府不久将会推出一系列对话,以帮助年轻的父母们在工作和生活上取得平衡。”副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰表示,这是之前推介各种其他措施的额外措施,比如2013年推出的陪产假,允许父亲们拥有更多时间陪伴他们的孩子。 王瑞杰出席6月16日,由非营利组织“好爸爸中心”(Centre for Fathering)旗下“终身为父”(Dads for Life)运动,以及新传媒联合举办的父亲节嘉年华Dad’s Day Out上,发表以上谈话。他也透露,有关的系列谈话将由人力部长杨莉明负责。 “一个家庭最大的困难之一,就是学着如何平衡工作和与孩子共度的时光。我和妻子之前工作,也为这项事情挣扎过……雇主也应该考虑,如何为全部父母们创造更好地工作和生活和谐的工作环境。” 网友盼制定可行方案 另一方面,人力部长杨莉明周日在其脸书上说道“在任何地方,父亲是否有权享有陪产假,对工作场所和文化规范而言是非常重要的。在很多工作与生活和谐相关的问题上,我对彼此行为塑造的期望比政策来得强。这就是为什么我认为这个话题值得和需要我们集思并付诸行动。” 她说道,“身为个人,我们必须做出什么选择,才能取得更好的工作和生活和谐?作为整个社会,我们应该如何更好地相互支持彼此,以取得工作、个人和家庭的平衡?”…

探讨异议课程遭耶鲁-国大学院腰斩 亚菲言:异议就是说不的艺术

“如果我们就连腾出空间去倾听那些说不的人,也做不到,那么民主已死。” 据报导,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。 有关课程原本计划在本月27日至10月5日进行,结果在开课前两周就被喊停。耶鲁—国大学院校长陈大荣教授,则在受询时向媒体解释,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点,这对于探讨围绕在异议周边的政治、社会和伦理议题,去做作妥当的学术检视是需要的”。 他续指,有关课程建议的活动和选取的讲员,也有损该校不把政党政治利益带入校园的承诺。 他也指出一些活动建议包括“可能使学生面临违法风险、或面对法律责任的元素”。 课程原本由本地剧作家亚菲言和课程经理Tan Yock Theng负责。 亚菲言对于本地时政课题向来有话直说,他著作的诗歌、剧作和短片等,也常触碰诸如政治、性别和族群等议题。 课程活动之一,包括观看独立制片人苏德祥制作“光谱行动”纪录片《1987解开阴谋》(1987: Untracing…

Goh Chok Tong undergoes kidney stone laser procedure; praises Singapore’s world-class medical service

Emeritus Senior Minister (ESM) Goh Chok Tong took to Facebook on Sunday…