In an open letter today (14 April), various community groups and civil society organisations urged the Singapore Police Force to end its investigations against the two youths who conducted solo climate protests this year. The group called for an end to the investigations without any charges and warning, adding these youths have done nothing wrong.
The 29 signatories include Community Action Network, Function 8, HOME, MARUAH, Pink Dot SG, Fossil Free Yale-NUS, SG Climate Rally, Speak for Climate, and Students for a Safer NUS.
The group expressed its solidarity with the two young Singaporeans who held up signs with environmental messages and took photographs of themselves in a public area. They noted, “These are peaceful acts which have not caused harm to any persons or property.”
The group went on to say that it does not see public benefit in tying up resources further in this investigation, especially given the current existential threat of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The letter also noted, “In addition, we are deeply troubled that peaceful expression on environmental issues that affect all of us is being silenced by authorities. This could impede open dialogue on such issues going forward.”
The group called on the state to “seriously reconsider” the laws under which these two Singaporeans are being investigated, saying that they are concerned that such “benign actions” of calling for a better world are being penalised.
Noting that the youth of today are the ones who would be most affected by the climate crisis and looming ecological breakdown, the letter stressed, “Instead of dismissing those who speak up, we should listen to and empower them, like many other countries are doing for their own youth.”
It continued, “Those who speak up on the climate crisis contribute in their own way to larger efforts to bring about a more just and inclusive Singapore. We should not be punishing them for it.”
The letter went on to emphasise, “Singapore cannot afford to turn away from our own carbon footprint and our responsibility to act, given our national resources and our capacity to enact real systemic change when we put our collective will to it.”
Using the example of the community’s response to the current challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic, the letter explained that “the same political will to act decisively, at a systemic and collective level, is urgently needed to deal with the climate emergency ahead of us.”
The signatories concluded the letter by saying that the crisis cannot be collectively addressed if there is no open dialogue and a “penetrating understanding” of the problem.
“Ensuring that the youth and other inhabitants of Singapore can ask for a liveable future, without fear or intimidation, is only the start, but it is the least we can do,” it stressed.

Police investigating two youths over separate solo climate strike incidents

Earlier this month on 1 April, the police announced that it is investigating an 18-year-old woman and 20-year-old man over two separate incidents of them allegedly participating in public assemblies. In its statement, the police said that neither of them had applied for the necessary permits before carrying out their activities.
Holding or taking part in a public assembly in the absence of a permit is classified as an offence under the Public Order Act.
On 13 March, the 18-year-old Singaporean student conducted a “climate strike” at HarbourFront—which houses the office of oil and gas corporation ExxonMobil—where she held up signs that said, “Planet over profit, School strike 4 climate, ExonMobil kills kittens and puppies”.
The police began investigating this student when it received a report of a Facebook post containing those same photos. In the course of their investigation, the police said they found that the 20-year-old man was involved in a separate incident later on 22 March. He had been photographed in front of Tao Payoh Central Community Club and Toa Payoh Neighbourhood Police Centre holding a placard that read “SG is better than oil @fridays4futuresg”.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pre-General Election campaigning

Staying together, moving ahead. Donaldson Tan

Indonesian domestic worker charged with murder for death of 78-yr-old employer

A 37-year-old Indonesian domestic worker has been charged in court on Wednesday…

总检察署要求高庭罚款范国瀚 、监禁陈两裕

社运份子范国瀚和民主党党要陈两裕,于去年10月被判藐视法庭罪成立。在昨日(20日)的最高法院审讯中,总检察署要求高庭判处两人返款和监禁。 总检察署政府律师森迪古玛兰,要求法官判处范国瀚一万元至1万5000元的罚款,以及监禁陈两裕15天。 与此同时,两人辩护律师尤金则要求罚款应定在四千元至六千元之间,而陈只需判处七天监禁。陈两裕也是民主党副主席。辩方律师寻求判决监禁,是因为在新加坡,公民若曾被判处两千元罚款或监禁超过一年,将失去竞选国会议员资格。 法官吴必理仍保留对案件的判决。 范国瀚是在去年4月,于脸书的贴文称,马来西亚法庭处理政治个案比新加坡司法更独立,而被总检察署指控藐视法庭。有关贴文也转载新闻:“《当今大马》挑战反假新闻法违宪”。 随后,新加坡民主党党要陈两裕在脸书为范国瀚抱不平,指出总检察署的举措,更加证实范国瀚的批评所言不虚。结果也同样被控藐视法庭罪。 2016年司法(保护)法令自2017年10月生效,上述两人“抢了头香”,成为该法令生效以来首两位被指控藐视法庭的个案。被判藐视法庭罪者,可被罚款最高10万新元,或监禁3年,或两者兼施。 范陈仍未移除贴文 古玛兰在庭上抗议范陈二人至今都还未移除有关贴文。例如范国瀚的贴文已经刊载了长达10个月21天。他形容两人“显然完全不尊重法庭权威,也否定法庭对他们的判决。”他们也从未就贴文内容道歉,毫无悔意。 不过,法官吴必理认为贴文存在多久不重要,关键是范陈两人都拒绝撤下贴文。 古玛兰也指出,陈两裕“有前科”,在2008年,甚至曾穿着印有穿法官长袍的袋鼠,被控藐视法庭,为此被监禁15天。对此,古玛兰认为陈两裕一再屡犯,不应轻判。 总检察署也要求范国瀚和陈两裕移除贴文,并公开道歉。…

供短距离路程租用 微型车明年榜鹅登场

明年我们或许会在榜鹅路上看到方块形的微型车(Microcar),专门供人们租用来进行短距离路程,只需要2元就可使用半小时,且停靠路边时,它还会自动前往最靠近的充电站“充饥”。 据《亚洲新闻台》报导,微型车的设计和推广公司QIQGlobal联合创办人Justim Sim指出,他相信微型车能够在类似榜鹅的社区获得推广,因为大部分民众在前往乘搭支线巴士(feeder bus)或轻轨列车时都必须走一段路,而微型车能够为他们提供方便。 这外形迷你的微型车长约2.4米,车宽约一米,或将于明年在榜鹅进行实验计划,虽然目前尚在和交通及物流行业的两家公司洽商,但是预计将会推出300至600辆供租用。 Justim Sim指出,为了确保微型车只用于短程路途,他们将会透过卫星定位系统(GPS)或射频识别科技(RFID),在车上设置虚拟地理围栏(geo-fencing)。 和需要被送到充电站的电动车BlueSG不同,QIQ打算让微型车能够自行“觅食”。在驾驶者将车子听在路旁后,微型车会自动前往临近的充电站,之后自行停车,驾驶者根本无需为寻车位烦恼。 他表示,公司也打算为微型车使用车辆成队技术(platooning),即由人类驾驶的微型车通过无线通信,带领无人驾驶的车队前行。这旨在减少将车子分发到所需地点的人力。 而在非高峰期,Justim指出,人们也能够使用微型车进行送货服务,以达到最大程度的车辆使用。 他表示,半小时的微型车车费约两元,若每日多次使用,一个月的费用将介于30元至50元,这将大大减低人们的开销。