In an open letter today (14 April), various community groups and civil society organisations urged the Singapore Police Force to end its investigations against the two youths who conducted solo climate protests this year. The group called for an end to the investigations without any charges and warning, adding these youths have done nothing wrong.
The 29 signatories include Community Action Network, Function 8, HOME, MARUAH, Pink Dot SG, Fossil Free Yale-NUS, SG Climate Rally, Speak for Climate, and Students for a Safer NUS.
The group expressed its solidarity with the two young Singaporeans who held up signs with environmental messages and took photographs of themselves in a public area. They noted, “These are peaceful acts which have not caused harm to any persons or property.”
The group went on to say that it does not see public benefit in tying up resources further in this investigation, especially given the current existential threat of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The letter also noted, “In addition, we are deeply troubled that peaceful expression on environmental issues that affect all of us is being silenced by authorities. This could impede open dialogue on such issues going forward.”
The group called on the state to “seriously reconsider” the laws under which these two Singaporeans are being investigated, saying that they are concerned that such “benign actions” of calling for a better world are being penalised.
Noting that the youth of today are the ones who would be most affected by the climate crisis and looming ecological breakdown, the letter stressed, “Instead of dismissing those who speak up, we should listen to and empower them, like many other countries are doing for their own youth.”
It continued, “Those who speak up on the climate crisis contribute in their own way to larger efforts to bring about a more just and inclusive Singapore. We should not be punishing them for it.”
The letter went on to emphasise, “Singapore cannot afford to turn away from our own carbon footprint and our responsibility to act, given our national resources and our capacity to enact real systemic change when we put our collective will to it.”
Using the example of the community’s response to the current challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic, the letter explained that “the same political will to act decisively, at a systemic and collective level, is urgently needed to deal with the climate emergency ahead of us.”
The signatories concluded the letter by saying that the crisis cannot be collectively addressed if there is no open dialogue and a “penetrating understanding” of the problem.
“Ensuring that the youth and other inhabitants of Singapore can ask for a liveable future, without fear or intimidation, is only the start, but it is the least we can do,” it stressed.

Police investigating two youths over separate solo climate strike incidents

Earlier this month on 1 April, the police announced that it is investigating an 18-year-old woman and 20-year-old man over two separate incidents of them allegedly participating in public assemblies. In its statement, the police said that neither of them had applied for the necessary permits before carrying out their activities.
Holding or taking part in a public assembly in the absence of a permit is classified as an offence under the Public Order Act.
On 13 March, the 18-year-old Singaporean student conducted a “climate strike” at HarbourFront—which houses the office of oil and gas corporation ExxonMobil—where she held up signs that said, “Planet over profit, School strike 4 climate, ExonMobil kills kittens and puppies”.
The police began investigating this student when it received a report of a Facebook post containing those same photos. In the course of their investigation, the police said they found that the 20-year-old man was involved in a separate incident later on 22 March. He had been photographed in front of Tao Payoh Central Community Club and Toa Payoh Neighbourhood Police Centre holding a placard that read “SG is better than oil @fridays4futuresg”.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡最佳生活的年代

The New Paper (TNP) 报道新加坡人希望新加坡的生活像当时70,80,90年代 (请在此阅读详情) 的确,对於普罗大众而言,新加坡最佳生活的年代是70年代末到80年代。当时的人民行动党政府,推行了三大利民政策 “居者有其屋”、 “贩者有其摊”,和”驾者有其车“。那是个一般人民能够很从容面对高素质生活的年代,一间110平方米 大的四房屋子是2万多元。 60年代我父亲开始开霸王车,收入不稳定,一些电台《儿童剧社》的小演员,都曾经是我父亲负责接送过的。后来70年末期吧, 人民行动党政府开始颁发的士执照给所有的霸王车司机。 当时父亲以7%的利率向他的一个哥哥贷款,(当年银行汽车贷款是7.5%),终于买了他生平第一辆黄顶黑车身的私人的士。那是他个人拥有的,不属于任何机构,自己开车自己当老板。…

前进党放眼问鼎包括西海岸等15选区

新加坡前进党在来届选举,放眼问鼎七个单选区以及八个集选区。 根据《海峡时报》早前报导,前进党助理秘书长梁文辉透露,该党已物色44个候选人人选,还有13人作后备,冀望能在来届选举初试啼声,打响名号。 “我们打算投入可观人数的人选出战,惟仍取决于和其他政党协商讨论。我们清楚我们仍是最新的政党,故此寻求与其他政党协作,并达致良好的安排。” 前进党有意出战的选区包括: 集选区:裕廊、西海岸、蔡厝港、丹戎巴葛、惹兰勿刹、碧山-大巴窑、义顺、三巴旺 单选区:丰加北、裕华、先驱、拉丁马士、哥本峇鲁、玛丽蒙(Marymount)和杨厝港。(后三者为新增单选区) 陈清木任亚逸拉惹区议员26年 梁文辉较后也向本社证实上述《海时》的报导,不过他无法100巴仙肯定,该党秘书长陈清木医生会否在西海岸集选区上阵,后者仍会根据当地居民的支持率和反馈作出决定。 他也表示,该党尽量避免与其他反对党陷入三角战,仍会与他们协商以达致共同目的。 现任前进党秘书长陈清木从1980年至2006年,担任亚逸拉惹区议员。该选区目前已并入西海岸集选区。他在该区仍有不少昔日选民和旧识,还有些家庭,全家都认识这位以前在阿妈宫诊所悬壶济世的医生。 上述前进党提及的选区,在2015年第13届大选由不同反对党出战: 由肯尼斯领导的革新党出战西海岸集选区和拉丁马士单选区…

TOC may not last another 5 years

~by: Ravi Philemon~ the following is the transcript of my welcome speech…

Hyflux’s current financial rut a consequence of “its own commercial decisions”: EMA

Hyflux’s current financial rut is a consequence of “its own commercial decisions”,…