Connect with us

Current Affairs

States Times Review FB page no longer accessible after Facebook ordered under POFMA to disable public access

Published

on

Media-giant Facebook has been directed under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) to disable the access of Singapore users to the States Times Review (STR) Facebook page.

The direction was issued by Minister for Communications and Information, S Iswaran on Monday (17 February).

In a press statement, the Ministry of Communication and Information (MCI) said that the disabling order follows STR’s failure to comply with recent directions that have been served on the page under POFMA on several separate occasions.

Most recently on Saturday (15 February), the STR Facebook page was designated a Declared Online Location (DOL) under POFMA, which is done when online locations have carried out three or more different online falsehoods that are subjects of correction direction, one of which was related to the Covid-19 outbreak.

Under the DOL, STR is required to carry a notice stating that it has been declared a DOL, which it has not done.

MCI said in its statement: “After being served a Declaration on 15 Feb 2020 notifying that it was declared a Declared Online Location (DOL), the STR Facebook page has not carried the required notice stating that it has been declared a DOL, which serves to warn visitors of the previous falsehoods that this page communicated.”

As of the publication of this article, the STR Facebook page is longer accessible.

According to a Facebook company spokesperson, it determined that the company is legally compelled to restrict access to the STR FB page in Singapore after “careful review of the order.”

“We believe orders like this are disproportionate and contradict the Government’s claim that POFMA would not be used as a censorship tool. We’ve repeatedly highlighted this law’s potential for overreach and we’re deeply concerned about the precedent this sets for the stifling of freedom of expression in Singapore.”

STR shuts down and transfers ownership to The Real Singapore

In a post on the STR Facebook page today, editor Mr Alex Tan wrote that the site will be shutting down in compliance with the MCI’s requirement. The post added that The Real Singapore (TRS) will take over the Facebook page and the ownership of the website, statestimesreview.com.

The post also introduced a new writer, Melanie Tan, who will be taking over TRS.

As of today, the Facebook page URL has changed to @TheRealSingapore.

In a separate post, STR explained the situation: “Singapore’s ruling party government has issued a censorship order on Facebook requiring them to block users from Singapore from accessing the Facebook page of States Times Review (STR).”

It added that while Facebook has yet to respond to the demands of the government, the social media platform is “held at ransom” because it has invested over US$1 billion in building a data centre in Singapore.

“The Ministry for Communications and Information has since threatened that Facebook faces a fine up to S$500,000 if it does not ban the States Times Review Facebook page,” said the post, referring to the penalties as outlined under POFMA.

It went on to say that Mr Iswaran “accused Alex Tan for profiteering from ‘fake news’”. It included a quote of the minister saying, “The STR Facebook page is linked to other websites operated by Mr Tan which derive monetary benefits from publishing falsehoods at the expense of Singaporeans and our society.”

The post continued to explain that the penalties Mr Tan faces for refusing to comply with the three POFMA correction orders and for “profiting from the page” adds up to about 12  years jail time and a fine of S$12,000, which is “ten times more serious than voluntarily causing physical hurt and molest charges”.

The post said, “Alex Tan, an Australian and Singaporean dual citizenship holder, has since responded to the POFMA order on Facebook by declaring the shut down of States Times Review. The Real Singapore has since taken over the website and Facebook page, with the Facebook url now changed.”

STR’s refusal to comply with correction directions

Last Thursday (13 February), the Ministry of Health (MOH) issued a clarification notice to STR to correct and clarify a number of statements published in a Facebook post regarding the Covid-19 outbreak. A targeted correction direction was also issued to Facebook.

Mr Tan said he would not comply with the direction because “the article remains factual”.

However, Facebook complied and posted a notice saying, “Facebook is legally required to tell you that the Singapore government says this post has false information” and provided a link to the government’s Factually website.

On 31 January, STR was issued a correction direction as directed by Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing over a post on Facebook claiming that Singapore had run out of face masks. Again, Facebook was issued a targeted direction for the post.

Back in November, STR received its first correction order over a post about an NUSSU – NUS Students United Facebook post relating to People’s Action Party (PAP) member Ms Rachel Ong. On this, Facebook did comply with the targeted correction direction which it received with a notice saying it is legally required to inform users that the Singapore government says the post contains false information.

Mr Tan, on the other hand, did not comply with any of the orders.

STR website blocked in Singapore in 2018

This isn’t the first time that STR has faced this issue of being blocked.

Back in 2018, the STR website was blocked by Singapore Internet Service Providers (ISPs) after it refused to remove a 5 Nov 2018 article entitled, “Lee Hsien Loong becomes 1MDB’s key investigation target”. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report (SR) Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

MCI had ordered the article to be taken down by 9 November while the Information and Media Development Agency (IMDA) warned that it would direct ISPs to restrict access to the site should MCI’s orders not be complied with.

As Mr Tan did not comply, the site was blocked a day later. STR remains inaccessible in Singapore.

Not the first time for transfer and shutdown

This is not the first time that STR has announced a shutdown. After the site was made inaccessible, Mr Tan said a Canada-based reader of STR reached out to him about continuing the website.

Mr Tan wrote that this new person will be the “solely in-charge of the writing and the IT back-end. I will have no editorial rights, nor will I interfere with his editorial”.

One diligent and eagle-eyed netizen actually tracked down the IP address and server of Singapore Herald which clearly shows the website is being hosted on the same server that STR was using.

Singapore Herald was also subsequently blocked by IMDA for failing to comply with their order to remove several ‘objectionable’ articles.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending