Singapore’s implementation of a 14-day quarantine period is still an appropriate measure, said Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chairman Dr Paul Tambyah.

In an interview with Lianhe Zaobao two days ago, Dr Tambyah was talking about the recent study from China which indicated that the Covid-19 virus could have an incubation period of up to 24 days.

Explaining that the incubation period refers to the time taken for the virus to invade the host’s cell, Dr Tambyah said that when the virus draws nutrients from the cells and destroys them, the body’s immune system will begin to attack the infected cells. This is what causes patients to develop symptoms later on.

A recent study based on data gathered from 1,099 patients diagnosed with the new coronavirus at 552 different hospitals in China showed that the incubation period for the virus ranged from zero to 24 days, with less than half of patients (43.8%) having a fever when they first see a doctor.

Dr Zhong Nanshan, a prominent Chinese scientist who is heading a government-appointed panel of experts to help contain the outbreak, said that these findings could help guide quarantine practice around the world, especially in targeting close contacts of Covid-19 patients.

The finding of a 24-day incubation period raised concerns that maybe the currently imposed 14-days quarantine might not be adequate as a precaution to curb the spread of the virus.

However, the study also noted that the 24 day incubation period is rare. As such, a member of the research team, Mr Guan Weijie, told Red Star News on Monday (10 February) that there is no need to prolong the isolated period for suspected patients.

The study was shared on medRxiv, a free online archive and distribution server for complete but unpublished medical papers. As the paper is yet to be peer-reviewed, the site cautions that it should not be used as a guide for clinical practice.

In his interview, Dr Tambyah gave examples of incubation periods for other coronaviruses that we’ve seen in recent history. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), he says, has an incubation period of two to seven days while for the middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) it is two to 14 days. For the influenza virus, the incubation period from two to four days.

Dr Tambyah also explained that contact tracing data may not be 100% accurate, with some information being omitted altogether.

He elaborated, “You may think that it was A passed to B, while their last contact was probably 24 days ago. But this may be wrong because C may appear in the middle, and C might contact with A earlier than B. C Infected, then the virus passed from C to B.”

The study

Other finding from the study include that the frequency of Covid-19 cases with no fever is higher than those in SARS and MERS. So surveillance measures and case definition guidelines that focus heavily on fever detection could lead to these infected patients being missed initially.

It also found that hat relying on CT scans to identify those who might be infected with Covid-19 is not entirely reliable since only half of those who underwent CT scans showed ground-glass opacity, and only 46 percent showed bilateral patchy shadowing.

CT scans were included in the diagnostic criteria for Covid-19 in as some doctors were concerned that the nucleic acid tests (NATs) alone were producing too many false negative results.

Alarmingly, the study also showed that only 1.18 percent of patients had close or direct contact with wildlife, which is where experts believe the virus might have emerged. However, about 31.3 percent had been to Wuhan City, the epicentre of the virus, and 71.8% had close contact with those from Wuhan.

1.18 percent of patients had close or direct contact with wildlife, which is where experts believe the virus might have emerged. However, about 31.3 percent had been to Wuhan City, the epicentre of the virus, and 71.8% had close contact with those from Wuhan.

Finally, the study concluded that Covid-19 is transmitted via the conventional route of respiratory droplets and direct contract. However, it also found that 6.5 percent of 62 stool specimens tested positive for the virus, while testing of four more patients show the presence of the virus in their gastrointestinal tract, saliva, and urine.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

What next for the PAP?

Excerpts from Siew Kum Hong’s blog: What. A. Night. The Workers’ Party…

Studies on mutation and aggressiveness of new Covid-19 virus is still at early stage

On Thursday (12 March), a South China Morning Post (SCMP) story revealed…

马来西亚有条件行管令延长一个月

马来西亚首相慕尤丁今日(5月10日)宣布,马国行动管制令将从5月12日开始,再延长四个星期,直至6月9日。 从今年3月18日至今日,马国全国行动管制令已进行54天。而来临周三将迎来第四阶段“有条件行管令。” 马国是在本月4日落实有条件行管令,放宽许多限制恢复局部经济活动。不过,慕尤丁仍敦促马国民众,仍需遵守政府定制条规。 马国开斋节料落在5月24日,与此同时东马沙巴和砂拉越州“丰收节”落在5月30日至6月2日间。 上述新措施也意味着,该国穆斯林仍不能自由地返乡欢庆开斋节。慕尤丁还呼吁民众需耐心等候,以阻断疫情传播。  

刘浩典:从新冠疫情危机,新加坡能吸取什么教训?

李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,本月16日在《南华早报》发表评论。他认为新加坡政府做了三个重要、且事后看来是错误的决策。但他也希望经此一疫,新加坡能摒弃掉多年来我们当中的许多人都表现出的——自以为是,傲慢自大,和很强的自我优越感。 首个错误决策,是因为初步评估判断冠状病毒19严重程度更接近猪流感(或H1N1),而不是SARS,这使得政府决定不关闭学校、停工停业。 其二,倡导人民不戴口罩。其三是尽管客工亦重组织已警告,客工宿舍拥挤环境恐成为防疫弱点,但当局未采取强制性、果断措施来管理。 刘浩典相信新加坡仍将挺过这场危机,感染人数成千上万,但死亡率应很低,再者政府已积极进行检测。 “我更担心的是,新加坡人会从这场危机中吸取错误的教训。” 他指出,尽管人民行动党不反对多样化观点和持不同政见者,不过坚持危机中人们应团结支持当局,异议争辩且暂时搁置。 但这种观点只对了一部分。危机中决策者面临的最大认知威胁不是缺乏团结,而是困在危机太久而产生狭隘视野。 “此外,面对一个前所未有、完全不熟悉的威胁时,我们现存的经验和机制可能都不足以应对,这使得政府倡导多元化变得更为重要,或者至少要对各种异议保持开放的心态。” 正如武汉的李文亮医生在去世前曾说:“一个健康的社会不该只有一个声音。”事实证明,那些一直呼吁政府为外籍劳工改善恶劣生活环境的人是正确的。他们就如李文亮医生一样,扮演着吹哨人的角色,尽管他们的观点不见得获得广泛认可。 以下为转载自香港科技大学微信号的中文版译文: 过去三个月内由于疫情原因,我一直在香港,这给我一个非常难得的机会从外部观察新加坡,观察一贯表现出色的新加坡政府如何在抑制新冠病毒传播的战役中挣扎,尤其是对众多低收入劳工居住(现已封闭隔离)的宿舍疫情防控的失败。新加坡人民行动党(PAP)政府应该为日益严峻的疫情承担什么责任? 到目前为止,很明显,新加坡政府做了三个重要的、且事后看来是错误的决策(包括不作为的决策)。…