On Tuesday (21 January), the Marsiling-Yew Tee Town Council elucidated that it did not make a police report to arrest a single mother for unpaid service and conservancy charges (S&CC) amounting to S$2,150.

It explained that the woman was actually apprehended after she failed to turn up for a mandated court hearing. This resulted in a warrant of arrest issued to her after being instructed by the Court, the town council said in a Facebook post.

The town council posted this clarification in connection with a recent Facebook post by activist Gilbert Goh on Sunday. Mr Goh stated he was “shocked” to know that the single mother with a 16-year-old son was arrested and held in police lock-up for close to 10 hours before being released.

Mr Goh pointed out that the single mother works as a promoter with a monthly salary of about S$1,000. She told him she couldn’t pay the S$159 monthly instalment and every time she lapsed, the town council sent in a legal reminder which costs S$200, further aggravating her S&CC default.

Mr Goh described it as “akin to paying a loan shark but this time it’s a legalised one”.

In the town council’s latest post, it stated that the woman living in a 5-room flat, has arrears in S&CC for many years before 2016. “Despite attempts at engaging the resident, the Town Council unfortunately had to undertake legal recourse”.

The town council explained that prior to taking legal action against the woman, it had sent out 6 notifications to the residents, and even visited her house twice.

“In this case, the Town Council sent out a total of 6 notifications by post between December 2016 and October 2017 and conducted house visits in August 2016 and November 2017 in our attempt to reach out to the resident,” it said.

After constant engagement with the resident, she made partial payment from the outstanding bills, and agreed on an instalment plan on 19 December 2017. “The Town Council immediately withdrew the court proceedings and updated the Warrant Enforcement Unit on the same day,” it noted.

It added that the woman’s latest instalment plan was made in November last year, and it allowed her to “gradually pay off the arrears while keeping up with the current monthly payment”.

It went on to say that it will work with grassroots partners to help her.

Town Councils must negotiate with residents over prolonged unpaid S&CC

As of April 2018, the State Courts placed in measures to direct town councils to negotiate and engage with the residents who owe S&CC before starting criminal proceedings against them as a last resort.

It is required to issue at least two notices to a resident who does not pay S&CC, before issuing a statutory demand.

It has been said that these protocols will give town councils a “consistent system” of managing these issues, and they will help identify residents who have genuine difficulties in paying S&CC or composition amounts. The town councils can then step in to help or adapt the penalty measures to the residents’ circumstances.

All the town councils engaged by the State Courts had indicated that they are agreeable to the imposed initiatives.

An article by TODAY reported that other than going down the legal route, town councils let needy residents pay off the outstanding amount in instalments, or rope them in to do simple part-time work, including looking out for areas that need to be cleaned or checking for defective items in common areas such as lightbulbs that need to be changed.

However, Marine Parade Town Council chairman Lim Biow Chuan was quoted in the same TODAY report, stating that it takes much “time and manpower resources” to serve three reminder letters and to get property managers to visit residents’ homes to better understand the issue.

Adding that while taking residents to court is only done when there is “no choice”, ultimately, the town council still has “an obligation” to collect the charges for a common pooled fund that is used for estate maintenance.

Mr Lim said: “We can’t have people who don’t pay and (we) do nothing… Just like a management corporation, we owe it as a duty to other people who are paying”.

Separately, the Workers’ Party town council said in 2015 that it has taken steps to collect some of the outstanding S&CC charges, but it will only use court action as the last resort.

In an article by The Straits Times in 2015, then-vice-chairman of Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) Png Eng Huat said that the they will only start legal proceedings “as a last resort after some time has elapsed”.

“From the first reminder right up to the legal letter sent to the resident, there are ample time and opportunities for the resident to make payment or negotiate a payment plan with the Town Council,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新马海空主权交锋引国际媒体关注 交通部今宣布扩大大士一带的港口海域界限

马新两国出现领空和领海权课题,闹得沸沸扬扬,也引起国际媒体关注。《日本经济新闻》撰稿人岩本健太郎,在一篇文章《新马为海空主权陷争议》中,形容马方有意收回南部国境的领空和海域权。而新加坡也向马来,针对各别领域课题提出抗议。 自1974年以来,柔佛近新加坡边境的制空权,交给新方管理。 马国交通部长陆兆福,在本周二表示,有意收回马国的制空权,因为该国多年来提升、并已有能力自理航空管理。 他表示有意和新加坡进一步洽谈收回领空权的细节,必要的话,也会请示国际民航组织(ICAO)。 陆兆福认为,新加坡要在实里达机场提升新仪表着陆程序和系统(ILS),可能导致柔佛巴西古当发展停滞,意味着该国必须遵照国际标准,任何建筑的结构或建设,包括高度都会受此限制,而且会冲击巴西古当港口船只的运行。 “我们并非反对实里达机场的发展,但是下降的途径不能越过巴西古当。”陆兆福这么表示。 新加坡交通部则在周二的文告表示,现有航运安排运作良好,任何的更动都会对许多相关机构带来影响。 与此同时,我国也对马国抛出海域界限问题,指出柔佛港口海域界限侵犯大士一带领海范围,而马国船只也多次侵入大士水域,违反国际法,而像新加坡提出强烈抗议。 而马国方面也在昨日,透过新加坡驻马最高专员署,向我国提呈两份抗议书。 坚称柔佛港口界限未侵新领海 抗议书分别针对新加坡于本月1日,发表在实里达机场执行仪表著陆系统,以及马新两国海域边界划界课题,包括新山港口划界等课题。 马国外交部也向新加坡政府抗议,新加坡民航局在没有获得该国政府同意下,擅自发表声明,公佈在实里达机场落实仪表著陆系统。…

CNB: Two Singaporeans arrested for suspected drug activities worth S$640,000

Two Singaporeans, a 30-year-old male and 28-year-old female, were arrested for suspected…

The indignity that Singapore Bus Drivers (SMRT) have to go through

This is a translation of forum post began by free planet go…

International consumer protection organisation files complaint against local farm for producing caged eggs

An international consumer protection organisation has filed a complaint with the Singapore…