On the first day of 2020, two errant e-scooter riders were caught by enforcement officers for riding their devices on footpaths as the ban takes full effect in Singapore.

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) took to its official Facebook page on 1 January (Wednesday) to state that these individuals were nabbed in Yishun and Sengkang.

“Our enforcement officers have started taking strict enforcement action against e-scooter users who are caught riding on footpaths. Earlier today, they were in areas such as Ang Mo Kio, Punggol, Sengkang, Sembawang and Yishun, and caught two offenders who were riding their e-scooters on footpaths,” LTA said.

It added that these offenders could be fined up to S$2,000, jailed up to three months, or both.

Since 5 November last year, e-scooters were banned on all footpaths across Singapore following a high volume of accidents involving such devices, several of which were fatal.

Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min said that it was a “difficult decision” to prohibit e-scooters from being used on footpaths, but “it is a necessary step for pedestrians to feel safe again on public paths, while still allowing e-scooters to grow in tandem with cycling path infrastructure”.

LTA also said in a statement last year that despite “significant efforts” to regulate the use of such personal mobility devices (PMDs) using laws and to educate the public in using such devices responsibly, “offences relating to errant behaviour and incidents involving e-scooters remained on an upward trend”.

Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads and footpaths in the Republic, but it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).

Up till 31 December 2019, there was an advisory period where offenders were given warnings, in order to give time for e-scooter riders to adjust to the changes.

“From 1 January 2020, a zero-tolerance approach will be taken and those caught riding an e-scooter on footpaths will face regulatory action. Offenders are liable for fines up to S$2,000 and/or face imprisonment of up to 3 months, if convicted,” LTA warned.

However, bicycles and Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) like motorised wheelchairs will not be subjected to the footpaths ban, and will also be allowed on all cycling paths and PCNs.

As expected, the ban didn’t go down too well with PMD riders, especially those who use the device as their livelihoods like food delivery riders. They vented their frustration online and even met MPs like Ang Wei Neng (Jurong GRC), Law Minister K Shanmugam and even Dr Lam.

In yesterday’s post, LTA stated that it will ramp up the construction of cycling paths and PCNs in the island to “better support active mobility”. LTA also said last year that it intends to “triple” the current distance of cycling paths from 440km by 2030, adding that all HDB towns will have a cycling path by that year.

Separately, Deliveroo has stopped assigning orders to food delivery riders who are using PMDs since yesterday.

A spokesperson told The Straits Times that existing riders who still own PMDs and have not switched vehicles or applied for LTA’s e-scooter Trade-in Grant by 31 December will not be allowed to continue working for Deliveroo until “they confirm they would like to switch vehicles”.

Upon the announcement of the ban last November, the government introduced a nationwide S$7 million programme to help food delivery riders trade-in their PMDs for alternative devices, offering a grant of up to S$1,000 per person depending on the alternative device of their choosing. The scheme received more than 3,000 applications.

This e-scooter Trade-in Grant is one part of the Transition Assistance Package (TAP), explained MOT in a press release (8 Nov).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SG High Commissioner seeks mercy from new Indian state govt after SG plonks $4B into state

Last month, it was reported that the joint venture project between Singapore…

《网络公民》总编回函总理新闻秘书

本周日,李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 对此,许渊臣在今日致函总理答复。在信中,许渊臣强调,自己始终都是问责、透明和法治的忠实信徒,并认为本地运营最久的老牌网络时政网站《网络公民》,身为总编,自己有必要说实话。 他认为有关评论文章不含诽谤性,而是根据可能对事件知情的总理家人此前发表的公开声明,也有鉴于涉及公共利益问题,为了能避免造成疑虑,只能重新复述总理弟妹曾说过的话。 张俪霖在信函中也指出,上述评论对李显龙作出的虚假指控,包括已故李光耀在2013年,得知欧思礼路38号故居未被列为古迹后,不再把李总理列为遗嘱执行人和受托人中。这些指控是李显龙妹妹李玮玲提及的。 张俪霖澄清,实则李光耀自2011年以后,都不再把总理列为执行人和受托人。李光耀曾向李总理解释,如政府有意收回故居,而弟妹对赔偿有意见,他不想让总理为难。 对此,许渊臣称,他也意识到有关内容让人对总理被移除遗嘱执行人的时间点上,可能产生误解,惟这并非他的本意,他针对此事致歉。 不过,许渊臣强调文章的用意,不是要让人引起对于这些指控在技术层面的误会,而是希望能反映更大的问题,即有关滥用权力的指控,以及已故李光耀和总理的关系情况。 “我诚挚地相信,新加坡人更关注这方面的议题,而不是您所提起的技术问题,因为也涉及已故李光耀先生的价值观。” 许渊臣表示,尽管他自己也担忧法律诉讼带来的代价很大,但愿意坦然面对,不仅是为了坚持自己的原则,也是维护自己对国家和新加坡同胞们的义务。 “我热爱这个国家和同胞们。我的道德义务,是协助消除掉在新加坡让言论噤声的恐惧氛围,希望能为新加坡的未来,建立一个更开放、充满活力和稳健的社会。” 故此,对于总理新闻秘书信函第八段提出的要求,即立即移除有关文章,并在本月4日(今天)前无条件作出道歉,以及承诺不在《网络公民》刊登类似的指控,许渊臣则婉拒了这些要求。 4…

居民10楼单位遭犀鸟霸道硬闯 留下“黄金”处处!

自然生态爱好者、Lepak SG的创办人何翔天,在脸书分享哭笑不得的经历:有犀鸟不请自来,硬闯入他在10楼的组屋单位,整整逗留了1小时半才肯离开,临走还不忘留下“圣诞前夕礼物”— “黄金处处”。 何翔天说,数周前就有犀鸟出现,停在他们的晾衣杆上许久才飞走。何翔天说,当时自己很纳闷,一般犀鸟会逗留在三至五楼的高度,飞到10楼的高度就较罕见。 然而,昨日(17日)约傍晚5时15分,家里却来了一对犀鸟。当时下着雨,窗户都关了,就剩大门开着,第一只犀鸟就由大门飞入家中。 何翔天说,当时他在赶着报告,突然被犀鸟“串门子”当下也呆了片刻,试图厘清眼前这出乎意料、奇妙的景象。不多久,第二只犀鸟又飞进来了。第一只犀鸟先是飞到了书架上,至少逗留了45分钟。 第二只犀鸟则几乎把何翔天整个单位拜访个遍,之后尝试从窗口飞出,不过因窗口关闭而不成功,然后又从大门离开。 至于第一支犀鸟,仍大咧咧矗立书架上俯瞰一切,似乎完全“无视”他们打扰了事主一家。 母亲在尖叫,父亲尝试用竹竿赶走犀鸟,不过基于多年与野生动物何环境方面的经验,何翔天选择向关爱动物研究协会(ACRES)求助,不巧当天ACRES也接到许多求助电话忙不过来。 之后,何翔天把家中窗户、门口全打开,就只是关上了厨房门窗,避免犀鸟闯入进食人类食物。他也关掉了风扇,避免伤及犀鸟。之后就只能等待犀鸟自行离去,何翔天也继续赶未完成的报告。 “约六点当我差不多要提交报告时,又听到尖叫,过后母亲就冷静下来。看来是犀鸟决定要换个地方,飞到了平时充电设备的椅子上,然后开始大便!” 做好“大生意”后,犀鸟还打算到事主家中的储藏室看看;之后又跳到餐桌上逗留了一阵子,才拍拍翅膀,从打开的窗户离开。…

Chan Chung Sing: Virus outbreak is a ‘very good lesson’ on importance of supply chain diversification

The spread of the novel coronavirus which has caused a shutdown of…