Last month, a man called Lim Chuan Poh penned his unhappiness in a letter upon finding out that the fee for a magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) scan at Changi General Hospital (CGH) was so much higher compared to a private imaging clinic.

The letter, which was published in Straits Times (ST) forum, stated that the hospital quoted him S$1,450 for the scan and the earliest appointment he could get for it was only in late March.

Given the constant discomfort that his shoulder pain was causing him, Mr Lim opted to perform the MRI scan at a private clinic. He said that he was given an almost immediate appointment and was “puzzled” to find out that the cost of the scan was less than S$600, including goods and services tax.

“I am puzzled by the difference in charges between CGH and the private imagining clinic I went to. What is the basis for CGH charging so much more for a similar service?” he asked.

He continued, “My concern is whether, besides the MRI, general hospitals are over-charging patients for other services. I hope the hospital and the Ministry will look into reviewing healthcare charges”.

CGH’s response

Following his letter, the Chief Finance Officer (CFO) of CGH Lim Lee Nor responded by saying that the hospital had “inadvertently” quoted the man the “upper limit of the estimated price range of the procedure”.

In the ST’s forum, he explained that the price for a scan depends on various factors like “the complexity of the patient’s condition, clinical protocols, type of machine used, the scan resolution and duration as well as the use of intravenous dye to enhance the image quality”.

The CFO added that the charges at CGH are comparable with those of those public and private hospitals in Singapore.

“Given that, our practice is to quote a price range to the patient. However, in this instance, we inadvertently stated only the upper limit of the estimated price range of the procedure in our communication to Mr Lim,” he noted.

He added, “We sincerely apologise for the inconvenience or anxiety caused to him.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chinatown’s Chinese New Year Bazaar cancelled next year due to concerns over crowd control — but netizens point out daily crowding in MRT, buses and wet market

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the annual Chinese New Year…

“美丽求求你”讽刺视频引发网友激烈讨论

近日闹得沸沸扬扬的网红“美丽求求你”拍摄讽刺视频,亦引起许多争议。内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根日前批评网红的行为“已过界“,认为该说唱视频有意侮辱新加坡华人,试图挑拨少数民族对华人产生愤怒。 美丽求求你的说唱视频长达2分50秒,于周一(29日)上传至社交网络平台上,其歌词内容相信是针对日前充满争议的epay的宣传照而讽刺,但同日下午就已撤下,在撤下前获得1100个赞和110则留言。 视频内普丽蒂批评新传媒拍摄的广告传递刻板印象,艺人打扮成印度人不好笑也看起来很傻,至少可以选用不同的人拍广告;至于她的哥哥苏巴什则揶揄“干嘛要妒忌他的肤色”,而怎么选谁都是华人赢;再者上一次屠妖节还有华人打扮成锡克族,令他感到受不了。 视频中两人也有作出比中指手势和粗口。不过在片尾普丽蒂声明,并不是针对指所有华人都是种族歧视的。 该视频是调侃早前新加坡华裔艺人周崇庆,为电子付费平台epay拍摄的宣传照片。周崇庆在广告中一人分饰四角,包括印度人和穆斯林妇女。有关宣传照被指制造刻板种族形象,欠缺敏感度。 对此,资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)发表文告表示,经判定后,认为该视频内容含禁止内容,基于公众利益与社会和谐,已指示发布者将其撤下。目前该视频已从各大社交网络平台撤下,包含原视频与重新上传的视频。 另一方面,针对具争议性的广告,新传媒亦撤下广告并致歉,epaysg也同时撤下。尚穆根承认尽管广告新传媒拍摄的广告“低俗”,惟网红的视频“已过界”,让警方要介入调查。   不过,有部分网民认为政府有“双重标准”的嫌疑。针对新传媒的争议广告,只需要致歉,然而对网红兄妹的惩罚反而“严正以待”,甚至出动警方调查。   网友Adam Mikhail…

Over 310,000 credit card data from six Southeast Asian countries are being sold on the dark web

Over 310,000 credit card details from six major Southeast Asian countries have…

SDP chief points S'pore govt serious missteps led to second wave of COVID-19 outbreak, urges S'poreans to think independently

The Government made three serious missteps that placed the lives and health…